| Literature DB >> 32198430 |
Rajnee Hasan1, Nasima Aktar1, Shah Md Tamim Kabir1, Ummay Honi1, Abdul Halim2,3, Rahin Islam4, Muhammad Delwar Hossain Sarker1, Md Samiul Haque1,3, Md Monjurul Alam1,3, Md Shahidul Islam5,6.
Abstract
Jute fibre is the second most important fibre next to cotton. It is obtained from the bark of plant through microbial retting process. Here we report optimized microbial retting protocol that can lower retting period and produce high fibre quality. A total of 451 bacterial colonies have been isolated from five jute retting water samples in Bangladesh. Higher pectinolytic bacterial isolates were predominant in the later stage of jute retting. Out of these, 168 isolates have been screened by both semi-quantitative and quantitative pectinase, xylanase and cellulase enzyme assay. Among them, 144 isolates have been selected on the basis of extra cellular enzyme activity of these three enzymes. 16 s ribosomal gene sequencing analysis identified 2 phyla- Firmicutis (80.55%) and Proteobacteria (19.45%). To check the synergistic and antagonistic effect 10 selected isolates were tested in 167 different combinations. Three best combinations were identified that lowered retting period from 18-21 days to 10 days producing high quality fibre in both laboratory and field trial. This improved retting technology can be adopted in industrial scale for the production of quality jute fibre in a controlled condition in reduced water quantity without polluting the environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32198430 PMCID: PMC7083874 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61898-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Heat map of liquid culture extra cellular pectinase, xylanase and cellulase activity of 144 isolates. Yellow to red color indicates lowest to highest enzyme activity.
Figure 2Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree construction using 16S rRNA gene sequences by Mega 6.0.
Figure 3Relative distribution of 14 species found in the 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis of jute-retting water.
Representative 10 bacterial strains along with their enzymatic activities.
| ID | Species | Enzyme Activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pectinas | Xylanase | Cellulase | |||||
| Zone size (mm) | U/ml | Zone size (mm) | U/ml | Zone size (mm) | U/ml | ||
| 84 | 21 | 9.68 | 21 | 3.19 | 13 | 3.87 | |
| 221 | 21.5 | 9.69 | 21 | 3.37 | 15.5 | 6.73 | |
| 374 | 20 | 9.20 | 20 | 2.17 | 14.5 | 5.41 | |
| 417 | 25 | 14.59 | 23 | 5.80 | 10.5 | 1.53 | |
| 421 | 19 | 8.71 | 20 | 2.67 | 10 | 1.02 | |
| 78 | 18 | 7.55 | 16 | 1.75 | 9.5 | 0.82 | |
| 104 | 23 | 11.36 | 23.5 | 6.38 | 14 | 5.70 | |
| 105 | 16 | 6.22 | 15 | 1.63 | 8.5 | 0.61 | |
| 166 | 17 | 6.87 | 16 | 1.87 | 10.6 | 0.98 | |
| 191 | 22.5 | 10.64 | 23.5 | 6.03 | 12.5 | 2.23 | |
| LSD ( | 0.875 | 0.217 | 0.846 | 0.172 | 0.894 | 0.243 | |
| Coefficient of Variation (%) | 2.98 | 1.34 | 2.93 | 3.10 | 5.22 | 4.90 | |
aLeast significant difference.
Enzyme activities of three selected bacterial consortia.
| Combination name | Strains | ID of isolates* | Enzyme Activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pectinase | Xylanase | Cellulase | ||||||
| Zone size (mm) | U/ml | Zone size (mm) | U/ml | Zone size (mm) | U/ml | |||
| C-51 | 5 | 78, 191, 105, 221, 84 | 28.0 | 17.0 | 27.5 | 7.67 | 15.0 | 6.63 |
| C-67 | 6 | 78, 191, 105, 221, 84, 374 | 31.5 | 21.4 | 30.5 | 8.56 | 20.0 | 9.92 |
| C-90 | 7 | 78, 191, 105, 221, 84, 421, 417 | 29.5 | 19.0 | 27.25 | 7.71 | 16.5 | 7.84 |
| LSD ( | 0.998 | 0.785 | 0.957 | 0.399 | 0.576 | 0.551 | ||
| Coefficient of Variation (%) | 1.95 | 1.81 | 1.93 | 2.21 | 1.94 | 2.98 | ||
aLeast significant difference; *Details are given in Supplementary Table 3.
Figure 4Comparison of mean pectinase, xylanase and cellulose activities of 10 representative individual isolates with 3 selected bacterial consortia.
Average retting period and quality parameter of jute fiber.
| Combination No | Treatment Contents (Water:Culture) | Average Retting Period (Days) | Fiber Strength (lb/mg) | Twisting Force (turns/cm length) | Luster | Fiber Color |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-51 | 10:1 | 13 | 8.57 ± 0.04 | 8.75 ± 0.14 | 33.33 ± 0.13 | Golden yellow |
| 5:1 | 11 | 9.34 ± 0.13 | 9.70 ± 0.05 | 33.97 ± 0.02 | Golden yellow | |
| C-67 | 10:1 | 12 | 8.58 ± 0.11 | 10.08 ± 0.01 | 34.24 ± 0.09 | Golden yellow |
| 5:1 | 10 | 11.06 ± 0.03 | 10.40 ± 0.11 | 39.46 ± 0.03 | Golden yellow | |
| C-90 | 10:1 | 12 | 8.96 ± 0.02 | 9.32 ± 0.01 | 31.92 ± 0.08 | Golden yellow |
| 5:1 | 11 | 9.27 ± 0.02 | 9.59 ± 0.03 | 32.35 ± 0.02 | Golden yellow | |
| Positive control | 10 L River water | 24 | 9.1 ± 0.06 | 9.52 ± 0.08 | 32.38 ± 0.17 | Golden yellow |
| Negative control | 10 L distilled water | 26 | 7.46 ± 0.02 | 8.96 ± 0.03 | 21.42 ± 0.21 | Golden yellow |