Literature DB >> 32197635

Improved detection of esp, hyl, asa1, gelE, cylA virulence genes among clinical isolates of Enterococci.

Alexander Kiruthiga1,2, Kesavaram Padmavathy3, Praveen Shabana4, Venkatesan Naveenkumar5, Sumathi Gnanadesikan6, Jeevan Malaiyan6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Virulence factors (VFs) among the clinical strains of enterococci play a vital role in pathogenesis. This study was aimed to screen for cylA, asa1, gelE, esp and hyl among Enterococcus faecalis (n = 89) and E. faecium (n = 51) by multiplex PCR. The previously reported multiplex PCR was modified to 2 duplex (asa1 and gelE, cylA and esp) PCRs and 1 simplex (hyl) PCR. The idea of the modification of the multiplex PCR proposed here emerged in the course of the research study when majority of the isolates which phenotypically exhibited virulence traits were found to be negative for the respective gene.
RESULTS: cylA, gelE and asa1 were significantly predominant in E. faecalis (59.55%, 85.39%, 86.51%) than E. faecium (1.96%, 60.78%, 9.80%) (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001967, p < 0.0001). hyl was detected in E. faecium (5.9%) only. The number of VFs detected in each isolate was recorded as the VF score. E. faecalis isolates had a VF score pattern of score 4 (34.83%), score 3 (26.96%), score 2 (28.08%) and score 1 (8.98%) while E. faecium had score 4 (1.96%), score 3 (7.84%), score 2 (25.49%) and score 1 (41.18%). This modification of the PCR protocol could resolve the problem of decreased detection of virulence determinants in enterococci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E. faecalis; E. faecium; Modified PCR reactions; Virulence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32197635      PMCID: PMC7085142          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05018-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Introduction

Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium, the two most common species of enterococci that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract are a leading cause of opportunistic and nosocomial infections in humans. Pathogenesis of enterococci is attributed to an array of virulence factors (VFs) viz., aggregation substance (AS), gelatinase (Gel), cytolysin (Cyl), enterococcal surface protein (Esp) and hyaluronidase (Hyl). Cytolysin elaborated by hemolytic strains of E. faecalis contributes to virulence in animal models and in human infections [1-3]. The cytolysin operon is a two-component system, lysin (L) encoded by cylL1, cylL2, cylM, cylB and an activator (A) encoded by cylA [4, 5]. Gelatinase encoded by gelE, is an extracellular zinc-endopeptidase/protease produced by E. faecalis that is capable of hydrolyzing gelatin, collagen, casein, hemoglobin, and other peptides [6]. Gelatinase production in E. faecalis contributes to virulence in animals and humans [7, 8]. Gelatinase damages the host tissue facilitating bacterial migration and spread [9], colonisation and persistence by biofilm formation [10]. Enterococcal surface protein, encoded by esp, is significantly higher among clinical isolates than faecal isolates and is associated with increased virulence [11], colonization and persistence in the urinary tract [12] and biofilm formation [13]. Aggregation substance, encoded by asa1, facilitates the conjugative transfer of sex pheromone gene-containing plasmids [14] and enhances virulence (adherence to renal tubular cells [15], heart endocardial cells [16] and internalization by intestinal epithelial cells [17]). Hyaluronidase, encoded by the chromosomal hyl, is reported to be specific for E. faecium [18, 19] and shows homology to the hyaluronidases of other Gram positive cocci [20]. Esp and Hyl are known to be specific for E. faecium, while AS, Gel, Cyl, Esp for E. faecalis [18, 19]. Though phenotypic and genotypic methods are available for the detection of VFs, majority of the previous studies (Additional file1: Table S1) have adopted the multiplex PCR protocol described by Vankerckhoven et al. [18]. Nevertheless, in our experience, we found isolates which phenotypically exhibited virulence traits were found to be negative for the respective gene. In addition, non-specific amplifications were observed. Hence, this study was designed with slight modifications to the existing multiplex PCR protocol [18].

Main text

Materials and methods

Clinical samples were collected after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, BIHER, Chennai, India (IEC No: SBDCECM106/14/08/dt19.06.2014). A total of 140 clinical isolates of Enterococci (E. faecalis [n = 89], E. faecium [n = 51] from urine [n = 111], pus [n = 24], body fluids [n = 4] and blood [n = 1]) from patients with urinary tract infection, pyogenic wound infection, infected body fluids, bacteraemia attending tertiary care hospitals in Chennai, South India were included in the study. Species identification and characterization was performed as per standard biochemical tests [21] and further confirmed using Enterococcus Differential Agar supplemented with 1% 2,3,5-Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride (TTC) (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India).

Phenotypic screening of virulence

Hemolysin production was assessed using blood agar plates (5% defibrinated sheep blood). A clear zone of haemolysis around enterococcal colonies after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h was scored positive [22]. Gelatinase production was detected by stabbing enterococcal isolates into 12% gelatin and after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, positive gelatinase activity was indicated by liquefied gelatin even after refrigeration at 4 °C for 4 h [22]. Slime production was detected using Congo Red agar. A positive slime layer formation was indicated by black pigmented enterococcal colonies after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h [23].

Multiplex PCR

DNA was extracted from overnight pure cultures of Enterococcal isolates by boiling lysis method. All Enterococci strains were screened for the presence of five VFs encoding genes (asa1, cylA, esp, gelE and hyl) using multiplex PCR as previously described [18]. Five primer pairs were used to amplify the genes asa1, gelE [18], cylA [24], esp [25] and hyl [18]. All the primers used in the study were synthesised at Macrogen (South Korea). This multiplex PCR is the most commonly used protocol for screening of virulence genes among enterococci (Additional file 1: Table S1). However, in our study, a very low prevalence of the virulence determinants was detected. Isolates which phenotypically exhibited the virulence trait was found to be negative (gene not detected by the multiplex PCR protocol) for the respective gene. In addition, non-specific amplifications were observed, amplicon size were not specific to the one indicated in the reference article [18]. Hence, simplex PCR for the individual genes were performed, followed by PCR with all possible combinations of the 5 genes. Finally, the following combinations of PCR reactions were standardised.

PCR standardization

Three different PCR reactions were standardised [two duplex (asa1 and gelE; cylA and esp) and one simplex (hyl) PCR]. Each 25 µl PCR reaction was set up with 2 µl of DNA template, 10× PCR buffer containing 15 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer specific for the respective gene (for duplex 1: asa1, gelE, duplex 2: cylA, esp and simplex: hyl (Macrogen, Korea), 0.5 U (for duplex 1: asa1, gelE and simplex: hyl) and 1U (for duplex 2: cylA, esp) of TaqDNA polymerase (Genet Bio Co, South Korea), 10 mM of each dNTP (BioBasic, Canada Inc) and 100 mM MgSO4 (New England BioLabs Inc, USA). The cycling conditions include an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 1 min), annealing (56 °C for 1 min), and extension (72 °C for 1 min), and a final extension for 8 min at 72 °C. PCR was carried out in Veriti™ 96-well Thermal Cycler, Applied Biosystem, USA. Known positive and negative controls were included for each run. DNA ladder, 100-bp (GeNet Bio, South Korea) was included as a molecular size marker.

DNA sequencing of virulence genes

PCR amplicons of each gene from representative isolates were purified by FavorPrep GEL/PCR Purification kit (Favorgen, Taiwan) and sequenced by Sanger sequencing method at Macrogen (South Korea) in single directions by respective forward primer using ABI PRISM®BigDye™ Terminator and ABI 3730XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA). All the virulence gene sequences were compared with known sequences in NCBI Database by using BLAST analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) and the sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database. (GenBank Accession numbers: MN398378 (asa1), MN398379 (cylA), MN398380 (hyl), MN398381 (gelE) and MN420464 (esp). These isolates were used as positive controls.

Results

Virulence phenotype

Of the 140 isolates, 58 (41.4%) (E. faecalis (n = 53), E. faecium (n = 5)) isolates were found to be beta-hemolytic. All the beta-hemolytic E. faecium isolates were those isolated from urine. Gelatinase was produced by 55 (39.3%) isolates (E. faecalis (n = 33), E. faecium (n = 22)). Slime production was detected in 130 (92.8%) isolates (E. faecalis (n = 82), E. faecium (n = 48)).

Virulence genotype

Among the 5 virulence determinants screened, asa1 were significantly more common in E. faecalis followed by gelE, while, gelE was the most common gene followed by esp in E. faecium. cylA, gelE and asa1 were significantly more common in E. faecalis (59.55%, 85.39%, 86.51%) than E. faecium (1.96%, 60.78%, 9.80%) (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001967, p < 0.0001). hyl was detected only in E. faecium (5.9%) and not in E. faecalis (0%) (p = 0.0465). However, no difference was observed in the incidence of esp between species ((E. faecalis (53.93%) vs. E. faecium (45.09%), p = 0.406164).

Correlation between virulence phenotype and genotype

Among the 53 beta-hemolytic E. faecalis isolates, 48 (90.6%) harboured the cylA gene. Among the E. faecalis isolates, 33/33 (100%) gelatinase producers and 43/56 (77.8%) non-gelatinase producers harboured gelE. Among E. faecium isolates, 14/22 (63.6%) gelatinase producers and 17/29 (58.6%) non-gelatinase producers harboured the gelE. Among the E. faecalis (n = 82) isolates that were slime producers, 45 (54.9%) and 73 (89.02%) harboured esp and asa1 while, 3 (42.9%), 4 (57.1%) of the non-slime producers (n = 7) possessed esp and asa1 respectively. Among the E. faecium isolates, 22/48 (45.8%), 4/48 (8.3%) of the slime producers and 1/3 (33.3%), 1/3 (33.3%) of the non-slime producers harboured the genes, esp and asa1 respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Correlation between virulence phenotype and genotype

Virulence factors (encoding gene)E. faecalis (n = 89)E. faecium (n = 51)
P+ G+P− G+P+ G−P− G−P+ G+P− G+P+ G−P− G−
Cytolysin (cylA)48553101545
Gelatinase (gelE)33430131417812
Slime
 asa17349341442
 esp453374221262

P+ phenotypically expressed

P− phenotypically not expressed

G+ Gene detected

G− Gene not detected

Correlation between virulence phenotype and genotype P+ phenotypically expressed P− phenotypically not expressed G+ Gene detected G− Gene not detected

Virulence score

Majority of the E. faecalis isolates causing UTI elaborated VFs compared to E. faecium (p < 0.0001, OR = 163.3333, 95% CI 20.2715–1316.0268) (Table 2). The number of VFs detected in each isolate was recorded as the VF score. Majority of the E. faecalis isolates had a VF score 4 (34.83%), followed by score 3 (26.96%), score 2 (28.08%), score 1 (8.98%) and score 0 (1.12%). Nevertheless, the VF score pattern exhibited by E. faecium was found to be in the reverse order: VF score 4 (1.96%), followed by score 3 (7.84%), score 2 (25.49%), score 1 (41.18%) and score 0 (23.53%) (Table 2). VF score 4 and 3 were quite common among E. faecalis than E. faecium (p < 0.0001, 0.0124) respectively. Nevertheless, VF score 1 was significantly associated with E. faecium (< 0.0001) (Table 3).
Table 2

Correlation of the virulence score of the enterococci with clinical source

Virulence factor scoreSpeciesUrine(n = 111)Pus(n = 24)Blood(n = 1)Fluid(n = 4)

VF score 5

(n = 0)

E. faecalis (n = 0)0000

E. faecium

(n = 0)

0000

VF score 4

(n = 32)

E. faecalis

(n = 31)

23800

E. faecium

(n = 1)

1000

VF score 3

(n = 28)

E. faecalis

(n = 24)

20211

E. faecium

(n = 4)

3100

VF score 2

(n = 38)

E. faecalis

(n = 25)

21400

E. faecium

(n = 13)

8401

VF score 1

(n = 29)

E. faecalis

(n = 8)

6200

E. faecium

(n = 21)

16302

VF score 0

(n = 13)

E. faecalis

(n = 1)

1000

E. faecium

(n = 12)

12000
Table 3

Comparison of VF scores between E. faecalis vs E. faecium

Virulence scoreE. faecalis(n = 89)E. faecium(n = 51)p valueOR95% CI

VF score 5

(n = 0)

0 (0%)0 (0%)1*

VF score 4

(n = 32)

31 (34.83%)1 (1.96%)< 0.0001*26.72413.5205–202.8634

VF score 3

(n = 28)

24 (26.96%)4 (7.84%)0.0124*4.33851.4112–13.3377

VF score 2

(n = 38)

25 (28.08%)13 (25.49%)0.888*1.14180.5228–2.4939

VF score 1

(n = 29)

8 (8.98%)21 (41.18%)< 0.0001*0.14110.0565–0.3525

VF score 0

(n = 13)

1 (1.12%)12 (23.53%)0.000*0.03690.0046–0.294

VF score*

Mean ± SD

2.854 ± 1.0401.235 ± 0.971< 0.0001**

* Mann–Whitney U test: comparison of VF scores between E. faecalis vs. E. faecium

** Student’s t test: comparison of 2 means

Correlation of the virulence score of the enterococci with clinical source VF score 5 (n = 0) E. faecium (n = 0) VF score 4 (n = 32) E. faecalis (n = 31) E. faecium (n = 1) VF score 3 (n = 28) E. faecalis (n = 24) E. faecium (n = 4) VF score 2 (n = 38) E. faecalis (n = 25) E. faecium (n = 13) VF score 1 (n = 29) E. faecalis (n = 8) E. faecium (n = 21) VF score 0 (n = 13) E. faecalis (n = 1) E. faecium (n = 12) Comparison of VF scores between E. faecalis vs E. faecium VF score 5 (n = 0) VF score 4 (n = 32) VF score 3 (n = 28) VF score 2 (n = 38) VF score 1 (n = 29) VF score 0 (n = 13) VF score* Mean ± SD * Mann–Whitney U test: comparison of VF scores between E. faecalis vs. E. faecium ** Student’s t test: comparison of 2 means

Discussion

In our study, 39.3% of enterococci (E. faecalis (37.1%), E. faecium (43.1%)) were gelatinase producers. Our results are in concordance with previous Indian studies that have documented a lower incidence of gelatinase production in Enterococci [26, 27]. Recent studies have reported an incidence of gelE in the range of 31–91.4% (Additional file 1: Table S1). Our molecular studies indicated that gelE was the second most common (76.4%) VF detected in enterococci, more commonly in E. faecalis (85.39%) than E. faecium (60.78%). Among the E. faecalis studied, all the gelatinase producers (100%) harboured gelE gene while, the reverse was not true. In contrary, 63.6% of the gelatinase producing E. faecium isolates harboured gelE gene. In concordance with previous reports, gelE was present as a silent gene in E. faecalis (77.8%), and E. faecium (58.6%) [18, 28]. In line with previous reports, 41.43% of our enterococcal isolates were beta-hemolytic [26, 27, 29]. In our study, of the beta-hemolytic enterococci (41.43%), majority were E. faecalis (91.38%) while, only 8.62% were E. faecium isolates. Our results corroborate with previous reports that document a very low frequency of cylA among E. faecium compared to E. faecalis (Additional file 1: Table S1) Of note, all the beta-hemolytic E. faecium were urinary isolates that did not harbour the gene cylA. Nevertheless, majority (90.57%) of the beta-hemolytic E. faecalis (urine (71.7%), pus (16.98%), blood (1.89%)) harboured the cylA gene. This finding is of clinical significance as the frequency of death is five times higher in an enterococcal infection associated with cytolysin-producing strain compared to a non cytolysin-producing strain [30]. In our study, cylA was present as a silent gene in 13.88%, 2.17% of E. faecalis and E. faecium respectively. Esp encoded by esp is associated with adhesion, colonisation and host immune evasion. Though previous reports suggest that esp is more common in E. faecium, in our study, incidence of esp was slightly higher in E. faecalis (53.93%) than E. faecium (45.09%) [31, 32]. The incidence of esp and asa1 shows a wide variation in various reports (Additional file 1: Table S1). Among the slime producers, 54.9%, 89.02% of E. faecalis isolates, and 45.8%, 8.3% of E. faecium harboured esp and asa1 respectively. In our study, esp and asa1 were found to be silent genes in both E. faecium (33.3%, 33.3%) and E. faecalis isolates (42.9%, 57.1%). As reported earlier, hyl was detected only in E. faecium [33]. Nevertheless, a few studies have reported the incidence of hyl in both species [29, 34–39]. Significant difference was observed in the VF score between species. In line with previous studies, E. faecalis (61.8%) were found to be multi-virulent with VF Scores 4 or 3 while, VF score 1 was quite common in E. faecium (41.18%) [27, 36]. Majority of the urinary E. faecalis elaborated multiple VFs compared to E. faecium. Non-expression of these virulence genes could be attributed to a triad of factors, (i) gene expression is triggered in late exponential phase at high cell densities, (ii) environmental factors might influence gene expression and (iii) in vitro phenotypic testing conditions are different from the in vivo conditions [28, 40]. Nevertheless, the presence of virulence determinants in the clinical isolates might contribute to increased severity as they could be expressed under optimum conditions in vivo. Metadata of the previous studies on the detection of virulence genes of enterococci by multiplex/duplex/simplex PCR is depicted in Additional file 1: Table S1 [18, 27, 29, 33–39, 41–59].

Conclusion

We report that our simple modification of the existing multiplex PCR had increased the detection of the enterococcal virulence genes. Predominance of virulence genes was in order of gelE (76.43%) > asa1 (58.57%) > esp (50.71%) > cylA (38.57%) > hyl (2.14%). Virulence determinants were more common in E. faecalis (asa1 (86.51%), gelE (85.39%), cylA (59.55%)) than E. faecium (asa1 (9.80%), gelE (60.78%), cylA (1.96%)). hyl was detected only in E. faecium. This modified PCR protocol could be useful to resolve the problem of decreased detection of virulence determinants in enterococci.

Limitations of the study

This study lacks the analysis of other virulence factors elaborated by enterococci. Also, majority of the study isolates were from urine with very less number from other body fluids. Additional file 1. Metadata.
  51 in total

1.  Molecular screening of virulence genes in high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from clinical specimens in Northwest Iran.

Authors:  A Hasani; Y Sharifi; R Ghotaslou; B Naghili; A Hasani; M Aghazadeh; M Milani; A Bazmani
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.985

2.  Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme.

Authors:  R R Facklam; M D Collins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Virulence and antimicrobial resistance in clinical Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Hanna Billström; Bodil Lund; Asa Sullivan; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Genetic analysis of the pAD1 hemolysin/bacteriocin determinant in Enterococcus faecalis: Tn917 insertional mutagenesis and cloning.

Authors:  Y Ike; D B Clewell; R A Segarra; M S Gilmore
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Nucleotide sequence of the gelatinase gene (gelE) from Enterococcus faecalis subsp. liquefaciens.

Authors:  Y A Su; M C Sulavik; P He; K K Makinen; P L Makinen; S Fiedler; R Wirth; D B Clewell
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  A potential virulence gene, hylEfm, predominates in Enterococcus faecium of clinical origin.

Authors:  Louis B Rice; Lenore Carias; Susan Rudin; Carl Vael; Herman Goossens; Carola Konstabel; Ingo Klare; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Wenxiang Huang; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Characterization and safety evaluation of enterococci isolated from Spanish goats' milk cheeses.

Authors:  Antonio M Martín-Platero; Eva Valdivia; Mercedes Maqueda; Manuel Martínez-Bueno
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  Molecular Characterization of Virulence Genes in Vancomycin-Resistant and Vancomycin-Sensitive Enterococci.

Authors:  Priyanka Paul Biswas; Sangeeta Dey; Aninda Sen; Luna Adhikari
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

9.  Antimicrobial resistance patterns and virulence factors of enterococci isolates in hospitalized burn patients.

Authors:  Leili Shokoohizadeh; Alireza Ekrami; Maryam Labibzadeh; Liaqat Ali; Seyed Mohammad Alavi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-01-02

10.  Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern and Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  Sridevi Shridhar; Biranthabail Dhanashree
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Prevalence and Virulence Characteristics of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in Bovine Mastitis Milk Compared to Bovine Normal Raw Milk in South Korea.

Authors:  Hyeon-Jin Kim; Hye-Young Youn; Hye-Jeong Kang; Jin-San Moon; Yong-Seok Jang; Kwang-Young Song; Kun-Ho Seo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Phenotype-Genotype Correlations and Distribution of Key Virulence Factors in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Patients with Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Yomna A Hashem; Khaled A Abdelrahman; Ramy K Aziz
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Molecular Characterization of Enterococcus Isolates From Different Sources in Estonia Reveals Potential Transmission of Resistance Genes Among Different Reservoirs.

Authors:  Erki Aun; Veljo Kisand; Mailis Laht; Kaidi Telling; Piret Kalmus; Ülo Väli; Age Brauer; Maido Remm; Tanel Tenson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Intracanal Medicaments against E. Faecalis Bacteria in Infected Primary Molars by Using Real-Time PCR: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yasamin Ghahramani; Najmeh Mohammadi; Ahmad Gholami; Dordaneh Ghaffaripour
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-12-21

5.  Prevalence of Virulence Genes and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Enterococcus Faecalis Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection in Shahrekord, Iran.

Authors:  Roya Jafarzadeh Samani; Elahe Tajbakhsh; Hassan Momtaz; Mohsen Kabiri Samani
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2021-04

6.  Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Traits in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase/AmpC-producing (ESBL/AmpC) Enterobacteriaceae from Humans and Pets.

Authors:  Ramona Iseppi; Alessandro Di Cerbo; Patrizia Messi; Carla Sabia
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.