Alicia M Pike Lacy1,2, Stephanie Mazerolle Singe1, Thomas G Bowman3. 1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs. 2. Dr Pike Lacy is now at A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ. 3. Department of Athletic Training, University of Lynchburg, VA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Conflict is prevalent between sports medicine professionals and coaching staffs regarding return-to-play decisions for athletes after injury in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting. The firsthand experiences of athletic trainers (ATs) regarding such conflict have not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the outside pressures ATs face when making medical decisions regarding patient care and return to play after injury in the NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) setting. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Semistructured one-on-one telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Nine ATs (4 men, 5 women; age = 31 ± 8 years [range = 24-48 years]; years certified = 9 ± 8). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed. Thematic analysis was completed phenomenologically. Researcher triangulation, peer review, and member checks were used to establish trustworthiness. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (1) pressure is an expected component of the Division I FBS AT role, and (2) strategies can be implemented to mitigate the negative effects of pressure. Three subthemes supported the second major theme: (1) ensuring ongoing and frequent communication with stakeholders about an injured athlete's status and anticipated timeline for return to play, (2) providing a rationale to coaches or administrations to foster an understanding of why specific medical decisions are being made, and (3) establishing positive relationships with coaches, athletes, and administrations. CONCLUSIONS: External pressure regarding medical decisions was an anticipated occurrence for our sample. Such pressure was described as a natural part of the position, not negative but rather a product of the culture and environment of the Division I FBS setting. Athletic trainers who frequently face pressure from coaches and administration should use the aforementioned strategies to improve the workplace dynamic and foster an environment that focuses on patient-centered care.
CONTEXT: Conflict is prevalent between sports medicine professionals and coaching staffs regarding return-to-play decisions for athletes after injury in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting. The firsthand experiences of athletic trainers (ATs) regarding such conflict have not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the outside pressures ATs face when making medical decisions regarding patient care and return to play after injury in the NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) setting. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Semistructured one-on-one telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Nine ATs (4 men, 5 women; age = 31 ± 8 years [range = 24-48 years]; years certified = 9 ± 8). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed. Thematic analysis was completed phenomenologically. Researcher triangulation, peer review, and member checks were used to establish trustworthiness. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (1) pressure is an expected component of the Division I FBS AT role, and (2) strategies can be implemented to mitigate the negative effects of pressure. Three subthemes supported the second major theme: (1) ensuring ongoing and frequent communication with stakeholders about an injured athlete's status and anticipated timeline for return to play, (2) providing a rationale to coaches or administrations to foster an understanding of why specific medical decisions are being made, and (3) establishing positive relationships with coaches, athletes, and administrations. CONCLUSIONS: External pressure regarding medical decisions was an anticipated occurrence for our sample. Such pressure was described as a natural part of the position, not negative but rather a product of the culture and environment of the Division I FBS setting. Athletic trainers who frequently face pressure from coaches and administration should use the aforementioned strategies to improve the workplace dynamic and foster an environment that focuses on patient-centered care.
Entities:
Keywords:
clinician-coach conflict; conflict of interest; organizational culture; role conflict
Authors: Thomas G Bowman; Stephanie Mazerolle Singe; Alicia M Pike Lacy; Johna K Register-Mihalik Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Ron Courson; Michael Goldenberg; Kevin G Adams; Scott A Anderson; Bob Colgate; Larry Cooper; Lori Dewald; R T Floyd; Douglas B Gregory; Peter A Indelicato; David Klossner; Rick O'Leary; Tracy Ray; Tim Selgo; Charlie Thompson; Gary Turbak Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Emily Kroshus; Christine M Baugh; Daniel H Daneshvar; Julie M Stamm; R Mark Laursen; S Bryn Austin Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 2.860