Literature DB >> 32195607

Updated Software for Automated Assessment of Glucose Variability and Quality of Glycemic Control in Diabetes.

Vanessa Moscardó1, Marga Giménez2, Nick Oliver3, Nathan R Hill4.   

Abstract

Background: Glycemic variability is an important factor to consider in diabetes management. It can be assessed with multiple glycemic variability metrics and quality of control indices based on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) recordings. For this, a robust repeatable calculation is important. A widely used tool for automated assessment is the EasyGV software. The aim of this work is to implement new methods of glycemic variability assessment in EasyGV and to validate implementation of each glucose metric in EasyGV against a reference implementation of the calculations.
Methods: Validation data used came from the JDRF CGM study. Validation of the implementation of metrics that are available in EasyGV software v9 was carried out and the following new methods were added and validated: personal glycemic state, index of glycemic control, times in ranges, and glycemic variability percentage. Reference values considered gold standard calculations were derived from MATLAB implementation of each metric.
Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient was above 0.98 for all metrics, except for mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (r = 0.87) as EasyGV implements a fuzzy logic approach to assessment of variability. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated validation of the new software. Conclusions: The new freely available EasyGV software v10 (www.phc.ox.ac.uk/research/technology-outputs/easygv) is a validated robust tool for analyzing different glycemic variabilities and control metrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EasyGV software; Glucose variability; Type 1 diabetes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32195607      PMCID: PMC7591379          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  31 in total

1.  The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch; Michael Brownlee
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Metrics to Evaluate Quality of Glycemic Control: Comparison of Time in Target, Hypoglycemic, and Hyperglycemic Ranges with "Risk Indices".

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  The use of a computer program to calculate the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions.

Authors:  Gert Fritzsche; Klaus-Dieter Kohnert; Peter Heinke; Lutz Vogt; Eckhard Salzsieder
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  GlyCulator: a glycemic variability calculation tool for continuous glucose monitoring data.

Authors:  Dorota Czerwoniuk; Wojciech Fendler; Lukasz Walenciak; Wojciech Mlynarski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it?

Authors:  Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David R Owens
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 6.  Utility of different glycemic control metrics for optimizing management of diabetes.

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Kohnert; Peter Heinke; Lutz Vogt; Eckhard Salzsieder
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-02-15

7.  "J"-index. A new proposition of the assessment of current glucose control in diabetic patients.

Authors:  J M Wójcicki
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.936

8.  A novel approach to continuous glucose analysis utilizing glycemic variation.

Authors:  C M McDonnell; S M Donath; S I Vidmar; G A Werther; F J Cameron
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Assessment of the severity of hypoglycemia and glycemic lability in type 1 diabetic subjects undergoing islet transplantation.

Authors:  Edmond A Ryan; Tami Shandro; Kristy Green; Breay W Paty; Peter A Senior; David Bigam; A M James Shapiro; Marie-Christine Vantyghem
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Relationships between daily acute glucose fluctuations and cognitive performance among aged type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Rizzo; Raffaele Marfella; Michelangela Barbieri; Virginia Boccardi; Francesco Vestini; Biagio Lettieri; Silvestro Canonico; Giuseppe Paolisso
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  3 in total

1.  Large-Scale Data Analysis for Glucose Variability Outcomes with Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Arsalan Shahid; Dana M Lewis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Switching from Insulin Degludec plus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor to Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide Improves Glycemic Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Preliminary Prospective Observation Study.

Authors:  Yuki Oe; Hiroshi Nomoto; Akinobu Nakamura; Saki Kuwabara; Yuka Takahashi; Ayano Yasui; Rimi Izumihara; Aika Miya; Hiraku Kameda; Kyu Yong Cho; Tatsuya Atsumi; Hideaki Miyoshi
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Improved glycaemia during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown is sustained post-lockdown and during the "Eat Out to Help Out" Government Scheme, in adults with Type 1 diabetes in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Parizad Avari; Rebecca Unsworth; Siân Rilstone; Chukwuma Uduku; Karen M Logan; Neil E Hill; Ian F Godsland; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.