Literature DB >> 32194930

Mathematical modelling of fluid flow and solute transport to define operating parameters for in vitro perfusion cell culture systems.

Lauren Hyndman1, Sean McKee2, Nigel J Mottram2, Bhumika Singh3, Steven D Webb4, Sean McGinty1.   

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a move away from the use of static in vitro two-dimensional cell culture models for testing the chemical safety and efficacy of drugs. Such models are increasingly being replaced by more physiologically relevant cell culture systems featuring dynamic flow and/or three-dimensional structures of cells. While it is acknowledged that such systems provide a more realistic environment within which to test drugs, progress is being hindered by a lack of understanding of the physical and chemical environment that the cells are exposed to. Mathematical and computational modelling may be exploited in this regard to unravel the dependency of the cell response on spatio-temporal differences in chemical and mechanical cues, thereby assisting with the understanding and design of these systems. In this paper, we present a mathematical modelling framework that characterizes the fluid flow and solute transport in perfusion bioreactors featuring an inlet and an outlet. To demonstrate the utility of our model, we simulated the fluid dynamics and solute concentration profiles for a variety of different flow rates, inlet solute concentrations and cell types within a specific commercial bioreactor chamber. Our subsequent analysis has elucidated the basic relationship between inlet flow rate and cell surface flow speed, shear stress and solute concentrations, allowing us to derive simple but useful relationships that enable prediction of the behaviour of the system under a variety of experimental conditions, prior to experimentation. We describe how the model may used by experimentalists to define operating parameters for their particular perfusion cell culture systems and highlight some operating conditions that should be avoided. Finally, we critically comment on the limitations of mathematical and computational modelling in this field, and the challenges associated with the adoption of such methods.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Keywords:  3D cell culture; bioreactor; drug testing; fluid dynamics; mass transport; mathematical and computational modelling

Year:  2020        PMID: 32194930      PMCID: PMC7061945          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  17 in total

Review 1.  Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.

Authors:  Thomas Höfer; Ingrid Gerner; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Manfred Liebsch; Agnes Schulte; Horst Spielmann; Richard Vogel; Klaus Wettig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Multiphase modelling of the influence of fluid flow and chemical concentration on tissue growth in a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Natalie C Pearson; Rebecca J Shipley; Sarah L Waters; James M Oliver
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  A low shear stress modular bioreactor for connected cell culture under high flow rates.

Authors:  D Mazzei; M A Guzzardi; S Giusti; A Ahluwalia
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper.

Authors:  Leonor Michaelis; Maud Leonora Menten; Kenneth A Johnson; Roger S Goody
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Characterization of paracetamol UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity in human liver microsomes.

Authors:  J O Miners; K J Lillywhite; K Yoovathaworn; M Pongmarutai; D J Birkett
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Formation of steady-state oxygen gradients in vitro: application to liver zonation.

Authors:  Jared W Allen; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2003-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing.

Authors:  Edward L LeCluyse; Rafal P Witek; Melvin E Andersen; Mark J Powers
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  Image-Based Modeling of Blood Flow and Oxygen Transfer in Feto-Placental Capillaries.

Authors:  Philip Pearce; Paul Brownbill; Jiří Janáček; Marie Jirkovská; Lucie Kubínová; Igor L Chernyavsky; Oliver E Jensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fluid Dynamic Modeling to Support the Development of Flow-Based Hepatocyte Culture Systems for Metabolism Studies.

Authors:  Jenny M Pedersen; Yoo-Sik Shim; Vaibhav Hans; Martin B Phillips; Jeffrey M Macdonald; Glenn Walker; Melvin E Andersen; Harvey J Clewell; Miyoung Yoon
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-30

10.  Multiphase modelling of the effect of fluid shear stress on cell yield and distribution in a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Natalie C Pearson; Sarah L Waters; James M Oliver; Rebecca J Shipley
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-09-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Non-destructive monitoring of 3D cell cultures: new technologies and applications.

Authors:  Marilisa Cortesi; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 2.  Current Perspective: 3D Spheroid Models Utilizing Human-Based Cells for Investigating Metabolism-Dependent Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Authors:  Christopher R Cox; Stephen Lynch; Christopher Goldring; Parveen Sharma
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2020-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.