Literature DB >> 15170526

Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.

Thomas Höfer1, Ingrid Gerner, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Manfred Liebsch, Agnes Schulte, Horst Spielmann, Richard Vogel, Klaus Wettig.   

Abstract

During the past 20 years the EU legislation for the notification of chemicals has focussed on new chemicals and at the same time failed to cover the evaluation of existing chemicals in Europe. Therefore, in a new EU chemicals policy (REACH, Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals) the European Commission proposes to evaluate 30,000 chemicals within a period of 15 years. We are providing estimates of the testing requirements based on our personal experiences during the past 20 years. A realistic scenario based on an in-depth discussion of potential toxicological developments and an optimised "tailor-made" testing strategy shows that to meet the goals of the REACH policy, animal numbers may be significantly reduced below 10 million if industry would use in-house data from toxicity testing, which are confidential, if non-animal tests would be used, and if information from quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs) would be applied in substance-tailored testing schemes. The procedures for evaluating the reproductive toxicity of chemicals have the strongest impact on the total number of animals bred for testing under REACH. We are assuming both an active collaboration with our colleagues in industry and substantial funding of the development and validation of advanced non-animal methods by the EU Commission, specifically in reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15170526     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-004-0577-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  33 in total

Review 1.  Alternative models in developmental toxicology.

Authors:  Hyung-yul Lee; Amy L Inselman; Jyotshnabala Kanungo; Deborah K Hansen
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 2.  T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin; Philipp R Esser; Sonja Schmucker; Lisa Dietz; Dean J Naisbitt; B Kevin Park; Marc Vocanson; Jean-Francois Nicolas; Monika Keller; Werner J Pichler; Matthias Peiser; Andreas Luch; Reinhard Wanner; Enrico Maggi; Andrea Cavani; Thomas Rustemeyer; Anne Richter; Hermann-Josef Thierse; Federica Sallusto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; Barbara A Wetmore; David J Dix; Stephen S Ferguson; Harvey J Clewell; Keith A Houck; Edward L Lecluyse; Melvin E Andersen; Richard S Judson; Cornelia M Smith; Mark A Sochaski; Robert J Kavlock; Frank Boellmann; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; John F Wambaugh; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The costs of REACH. REACH is largely welcomed, but the requirement to test existing chemicals for adverse effects is not good news for all.

Authors:  Holger Breithaupt
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Animal rights, human wrongs? Introduction to the Talking Point on the use of animals in scientific research.

Authors:  Frank Gannon
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Toxicology for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Haze and health impacts in ASEAN countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Logaraj Ramakreshnan; Nasrin Aghamohammadi; Chng Saun Fong; Awang Bulgiba; Rafdzah Ahmad Zaki; Li Ping Wong; Nik Meriam Sulaiman
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Mathematical modelling of fluid flow and solute transport to define operating parameters for in vitro perfusion cell culture systems.

Authors:  Lauren Hyndman; Sean McKee; Nigel J Mottram; Bhumika Singh; Steven D Webb; Sean McGinty
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Gene-modified embryonic stem cell test to characterize chemical risks.

Authors:  Kohei Kitada; Akane Kizu; Takeshi Teramura; Toshiyuki Takehara; Masami Hayashi; Daisuke Tachibana; Hideki Wanibuchi; Shoji Fukushima; Masayasu Koyama; Kayo Yoshida; Takashi Morita
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Temporal gradients in microfluidic systems to probe cellular dynamics: a review.

Authors:  Raghuram Dhumpa; Michael G Roper
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 6.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.