| Literature DB >> 32194426 |
Gerardo Mata-Torres1, Adolfo Andrade-Cetto1, Fernanda Artemisa Espinoza-Hernández1, René Cárdenas-Vázquez2.
Abstract
De novo hepatic glucose production or hepatic gluconeogenesis is the main contributor to hyperglycemia in the fasting state in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) owing to insulin resistance, which leads to at least twice as much glucose synthesis compared to healthy subjects. Therefore, control of this pathway is a promising target to avoid the chronic complications associated with elevated glucose levels. Patients with T2D in the rural communities of Mexico use medicinal plants prepared as infusions that are consumed over the day between meals, thus following this rationale (consumption of the infusions in the fasting state), one approach to understanding the possible mechanism of action of medicinal plants is to assess their capacity to inhibit hepatic glucose production. Furthermore, in several of these plants, the presence of phenolic acids able to block the enzyme glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) is reported. In the present work, extracts of Ageratina petiolaris, Bromelia karatas, Equisetum myriochaetum, Rhizophora mangle, and Smilax moranensis, which are Mexican plants that have been traditionally used to treat T2D, were assayed to evaluate their possible hepatic glucose output (HGO) inhibitory activity with a pyruvate tolerance test in 18-h fasted STZ-NA Wistar rats after oral administration of the extracts. In addition, the in vitro effects of the extracts on the last HGO rate-limiting enzyme G6Pase was analyzed. Our results showed that four of these plants had an effect on hepatic glucose production in the in vivo or in vitro assays. A. petiolaris and R. mangle extracts decreased glucose output, preventing an increase in the blood glucose levels and sustaining this prevented increase after pyruvate administration. Moreover, both extracts inhibited the catalytic activity of the G6Pase complex. On the other hand, even though S. moranensis and B. karatas did not exhibit a significant in vivo effect, S. moranensis had the most potent inhibitory effect on this enzymatic system, while the E. myriochaetum extract only inhibited hepatic glucose production in the pyruvate tolerance test. Because of the traditional method in which diabetic patients use plants, hepatic glucose production inhibition seems to be a mechanism that partially explains the common hypoglycemic effect. However, further studies must be carried out to characterize other mechanisms whereby these plants can decrease HGO.Entities:
Keywords: glucose 6 phosphatase; hepatic glucose output; medicinal plant; traditional medicine; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32194426 PMCID: PMC7065531 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Plasma glucose values measured at the pyruvate tolerance test on STZ-NA induced hyperglycemic rats.
| 1. N | 109 ± 4 | 111 ± 4 | 107 ± 3 | 104 ± 4 | 102 ± 3 |
| 100% | 102% | 98% | 96% | 94% | |
| 2. NP | 111 ± 3 | 173 ± 4a* | 176 ± 7a* | 149 ± 6* | 132 ± 6 |
| 100% | 157% | 158% | 134% | 119% | |
| 3. H | 193 ± 4a | 213 ± 7ab | 200 ± 5ab | 198 ± 7ab | 189 ± 4ab |
| 100% | 110% | 104% | 103% | 98% | |
| 4. HP | 195 ± 8 | 354 ± 18* | 373 ± 17* | 365 ± 11* | 362 ± 10* |
| 100% | 181% | 192% | 188% | 187% | |
| 5. HPM 500 mg/kg | 190 ± 4 | 246 ± 6b* | 212 ± 7b | 189 ± 11b | 160 ± 10b |
| 100% | 130% | 112% | 100% | 85% | |
| 6. HPAp 160 mg/kg | 197 ± 5 | 288 ± 7b* | 301 ± 8b* | 317 ± 11b* | 323 ± 9* |
| 100% | 147% | 153% | 161% | 165% | |
| 7. HPBk 218 mg/kg | 189 ± 4 | 336 ± 10* | 343 ± 12* | 359 ± 9* | 351 ± 10* |
| 100% | 178% | 181% | 190% | 186% | |
| 8. HPEm 330 mg/kg | 191 ± 4 | 319 ± 14* | 314 ± 12b* | 319 ± 13b* | 327 ± 14* |
| 100% | 168% | 166% | 169% | 173% | |
| 9. HPRm 90 mg/kg | 194 ± 5 | 273 ± 14b* | 279 ± 12b* | 291 ± 11b* | 295 ± 12b* |
| 100% | 142% | 145% | 151% | 154% | |
| 10. HPSm 80 mg/kg | 199 ± 6 | 314 ± 12* | 333 ± 13* | 351 ± 10* | 350 ± 12* |
| 100% | 158% | 168% | 178% | 178% |
FIGURE 1Effect of plant extracts on pyruvate tolerance tests on STZ-NA induced hyperglycemic rats. (A) Comparison of plant extract curves. Letter “b” indicates significant difference versus hyperglycemic + pyruvate group (HP) at p < 0.05; *indicates significant difference with time 0 of the same group at p < 0.05. (B) AUC values. The bars represent the mean ± SEM. Different letters over bars indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 (a > b > c > d > e > f). N, normoglycemic group; NP, normoglycemic + pyruvate group; H, hyperglycemic; HP, hyperglycemic + pyruvate group; HPM, hyperglycemic + pyruvate + metformin group; HPAp, hyperglycemic + pyruvate + Ageratina petiolaris group; HPBk, hyperglycemic + pyruvate + Bromelia karatas group; HPEm, hyperglycemic + pyruvate + Equisetum myriochaetum group; HPRm, hyperglycemic + pyruvate + Rhizophora mangle group; HPSm, hyperglycemic + pyruvate + Smilax moranensis group.
IC50 values of plant extracts obtained from G6Pase system inhibition assay.
| 1. CA | 63 μg/ml |
| 2. | 223 μg/ml |
| 3. | 1136 μg/ml |
| 4. | – |
| 5. | 99 μg/ml |
| 6. | 84 μg/ml |
FIGURE 2Comparison of inhibitory concentration-response curves of chlorogenic acid and each plant extract on G6Pase system activity. Each point represents the mean of three replicates ± SEM. CA, chlorogenic acid.
FIGURE 3Mechanisms of hepatic gluconeogenesis inhibition exerted by some identified compounds from evaluated plant extracts in this study. Active compounds could have two main ways to decrease HGO: (1) direct inhibition of gluconeogenic enzymes, for instance, inhibition of G6Pase system by CA and inhibition of PC by kaempferol; or (2) decreasing expression levels of gluconeogenic enzymes via Akt pathway (kaempferol, resveratrol and, epicatechin) or AMPK activation (CA and epicatechin). IRS, insulin receptor substrate; PI(4,5)P2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PI(3,4,5)P3, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate; PDK1, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1; PDK2, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 2; Akt, protein kinase B; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F-6-P, fructose-6-phosphate; F-1,6-bisP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; G6Pase, glucose-6-phosphatase.