| Literature DB >> 32193605 |
Sarah L James1, Mojgan Rabiey2, Benjamin W Neuman3, Glynn Percival4, Robert W Jackson1.
Abstract
Bleeding canker of horse chestnut trees is a bacterial disease, caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi, estimated to be present in ~ 50% of UK horse chestnut trees. Currently, the disease has no cure and tree removal can be a common method of reducing inoculum and preventing spread. One potential method of control could be achieved using naturally occurring bacteriophages infective to the causative bacterium. Bacteriophages were isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic horse chestnut trees in three locations in the South East of England. The phages were found to be belonging to both the Myoviridae and Podoviridae families by RAPD PCR and transmission electron microscopy. Experimental coevolution was carried out to understand the dynamics of bacterial resistance and phage infection and to determine whether new infective phage genotypes would emerge. The phages exhibited different coevolution patterns with their bacterial hosts across time. This approach could be used to generate novel phages for use in biocontrol cocktails in an effort to reduce the potential emergence of bacterial resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32193605 PMCID: PMC7334240 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-020-01952-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Microbiol ISSN: 0343-8651 Impact factor: 2.188
Bacterial strains used in this study
| Bacterium | Strain | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2250 | Horse Chestnut in Pitlochry, UK, Green et al. [ | |
| 6617 | Horse Chestnut in Glasgow, UK, Green et al. [ | |
| 6619 | Horse Chestnut in Winchester, UK | |
| 6620 | Horse Chestnut in Ewelme, UK | |
| 6623 | Horse Chestnut in Alice Holt, UK | |
| 6631 | Horse Chestnut in Belgium, Bultreys and Gheysen [ | |
| 12,471 | Yamamoto et al. (2000) | |
| 789 | Cucurbit pathogen, Yamamoto et al. (2000) | |
| DC3000 | Tomato pathogen, Buell et al. (2003) | |
| NCPPB 2472 | Mushroom pathogen, Storey (2018) | |
| 907 | Zannoni and Ingledew (1984) | |
| CFBP5454 | Tomato pathogen, Solaiman et al. (2005) | |
| Pf-01 | Soil, Compeau et al. (1988) | |
| Pf-5 | Rhizosphere of cotton seedlings, Howell and Stipanovic (1979) | |
| PAW340 | Soil, Franklin and Williams (1980) | |
| 2192T | Mushroom pathogen, Storey (2018) | |
| ICMP 2848 | Beana | |
| NCPPB 247 | Lettuceb | |
| NCPPB 949 | Lettucec | |
| CwR94 | Strawberry, Hamilton (2015) | |
| CFBP 1430 | ||
| RCR221 | White clover, Roberts et al. (2017) |
Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi (Pae) 2250 was used as the host strain for isolation and propagation of phage isolates. Others strains of Pae, alongside other Pseudomonads and environmental bacteria, used for analysis of host range
ahttps://ncppb.fera.defra.gov.uk/furtherinfo.cfm?ncppb_no=247
bhttps://ncppb.fera.defra.gov.uk/furtherinfo.cfm?ncppb_no=949
chttps://scd.landcareresearch.co.nz/Specimen/ICMP_2848
Host range analysis of twenty-two phage isolates from leaves (L) and soil (S) of A. hippocastanum trees
| Sample | 2250 | 6617 | 6619 | 6620 | 6623 | 6631 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC1 L | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − |
| RC10 L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| RC5 L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| RC3C L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| RC7C L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| RC8C L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| RC9C L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| RC9 S | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| RC5C S | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| − | |||||||||
| − | − | − | |||||||
| 4 K L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| 4CK L | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| − | − | − | |||||||
| 2 K S | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| 4 K S | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| 4 K S | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| 1CK S | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| 1CK S | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| − | − | ||||||||
| 3CK S | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| 3H S | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
Highlighted text (bold) denote phage selected and used for further in-depth characterisation, coevolution and trial. Most phages were able to infect Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi (2250, 6617, 6619, 6620, 6623, 6631) alongside other Pseudomonads (P. syringae pv. lachrymans, P. syringae pv. tomato, P. marginalis pv. marginalis)
Fig. 1Morphology of two phages determined by transmission electron microscopy. a 2KS. b RC5CS. The size marker represents 50 nm
Fig. 2Rate of evolution of phages through time. a RC8CS, b 2KS, c 1CKS, d RC5CS. The experimental coevolution was done by inoculating King B medium (KB) with phage and bacteria. After 48 h incubation at 27 °C, both bacteria and phage were recovered and transferred to new KB broths. This was repeated for 12 transfers with sample population collections every 2nd transfer. Each line represents the resistance of bacteria to past (two transfers previous), contemporary (the present transfer) and future (two transfers subsequent) phage. Values are mean of six replicates ± SEM
Fig. 3In vitro killing curve of past and future phages. a RC8CS, b 2KS, c RC5CS, d 1CKS phage on the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi 2250 (control) using MOI of 0.1. Past, wildtype phage and future phage isolated from the coevolution end point (passage 12). Past: phage collected and tested from two transfers previous and future: phage collected and tested from two transfers subsequent to present phage. The plate was incubated at 27 °C and the OD595 was measured every 20 min for 24 h with shaking for 10 s before each reading. Values are the means of 6 replicates