Literature DB >> 32193349

Bayesian inference of chromatin structure ensembles from population-averaged contact data.

Simeon Carstens1,2,3, Michael Nilges3, Michael Habeck4,5.   

Abstract

Mounting experimental evidence suggests a role for the spatial organization of chromatin in crucial processes of the cell nucleus such as transcription regulation. Chromosome conformation capture techniques allow us to characterize chromatin structure by mapping contacts between chromosomal loci on a genome-wide scale. The most widespread modality is to measure contact frequencies averaged over a population of cells. Single-cell variants exist, but suffer from low contact numbers and have not yet gained the same resolution as population methods. While intriguing biological insights have already been garnered from ensemble-averaged data, information about three-dimensional (3D) genome organization in the underlying individual cells remains largely obscured because the contact maps show only an average over a huge population of cells. Moreover, computational methods for structure modeling of chromatin have mostly focused on fitting a single consensus structure, thereby ignoring any cell-to-cell variability in the model itself. Here, we propose a fully Bayesian method to infer ensembles of chromatin structures and to determine the optimal number of states in a principled, objective way. We illustrate our approach on simulated data and compute multistate models of chromatin from chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C) data. Comparison with independent data suggests that the inferred ensembles represent the underlying sample population faithfully. Harnessing the rich information contained in multistate models, we investigate cell-to-cell variability of chromatin organization into topologically associating domains, thus highlighting the ability of our approach to deliver insights into chromatin organization of great biological relevance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; chromosome conformation capture; genome structure modeling; model comparison

Year:  2020        PMID: 32193349      PMCID: PMC7148566          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910364117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  Bayesian ensemble refinement by replica simulations and reweighting.

Authors:  Gerhard Hummer; Jürgen Köfinger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Producing genome structure populations with the dynamic and automated PGS software.

Authors:  Nan Hua; Harianto Tjong; Hanjun Shin; Ke Gong; Xianghong Jasmine Zhou; Frank Alber
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Principles of protein structural ensemble determination.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bonomi; Gabriella T Heller; Carlo Camilloni; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Population-based 3D genome structure analysis reveals driving forces in spatial genome organization.

Authors:  Harianto Tjong; Wenyuan Li; Reza Kalhor; Chao Dai; Shengli Hao; Ke Gong; Yonggang Zhou; Haochen Li; Xianghong Jasmine Zhou; Mark A Le Gros; Carolyn A Larabell; Lin Chen; Frank Alber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transferable model for chromosome architecture.

Authors:  Michele Di Pierro; Bin Zhang; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Peter G Wolynes; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre.

Authors:  Elphège P Nora; Bryan R Lajoie; Edda G Schulz; Luca Giorgetti; Ikuhiro Okamoto; Nicolas Servant; Tristan Piolot; Nynke L van Berkum; Johannes Meisig; John Sedat; Joost Gribnau; Emmanuel Barillot; Nils Blüthgen; Job Dekker; Edith Heard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.

Authors:  Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells.

Authors:  Bogdan Bintu; Leslie J Mateo; Jun-Han Su; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Mirae Parker; Seon Kinrot; Kei Yamaya; Alistair N Boettiger; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model.

Authors:  Mariano Barbieri; Mita Chotalia; James Fraser; Liron-Mark Lavitas; Josée Dostie; Ana Pombo; Mario Nicodemi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Bayesian inference of protein conformational ensembles from limited structural data.

Authors:  Wojciech Potrzebowski; Jill Trewhella; Ingemar Andre
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  Single-cell Hi-C data analysis: safety in numbers.

Authors:  Aleksandra A Galitsyna; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Perspectives for the reconstruction of 3D chromatin conformation using single cell Hi-C data.

Authors:  Pavel I Kos; Aleksandra A Galitsyna; Sergey V Ulianov; Mikhail S Gelfand; Sergey V Razin; Alexander V Chertovich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.