| Literature DB >> 32192185 |
Katarzyna Januszewicz1, Paweł Kazimierski2, Wojciech Kosakowski3, Witold M Lewandowski1.
Abstract
This review deals with the technologies of limonene production from waste tyre pyrolysis. Thermal decomposition is attractive for tackling the waste tyre disposal problem, as it enables both: energy to be recovered and limonene to be obtained. This material management recycling of tyres is environmentally more beneficial than the burning of all valuable products, including limonene. Given this recoverability of materials from waste tyres, a comprehensive evaluation was carried out to show the main effect of process conditions (heating rate, temperature, pressure, carrier gas flow rate, and type of volatile residence and process times) for different pyrolytic methods and types of apparatus on the yield of limonene. All the results cited are given in the context of the pyrolysis method and the type of reactor, as well as the experimental conditions in order to avoid contradictions between different researchers. It is shown that secondary and side reactions are very sensitive to interaction with the above-mentioned variables. The yields of all pyrolytic products are also given, as background for limonene, the main product reported in this study.Entities:
Keywords: limonene obtaining; pyrolysis tyres; waste tyres
Year: 2020 PMID: 32192185 PMCID: PMC7143481 DOI: 10.3390/ma13061359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Structural formulas of limonene and its enantiomers.
Figure 2Mechanism of the pyrolytic decomposition of natural rubber to limonene and isoprene monomers [23].
Figure 3The second pathway of limonene formation from isoprene monomers via the Diels- Alder reaction.
Figure 4Mechanism of the pyrolytic decomposition of natural rubber (polyisoprene) to propylene and its isomerization into limonene [25].
Figure 5Mechanism of secondary limonene conversion (thermal degradation) into other aromatic derivatives of BTX (benzene, toluene, xylene). [23].
Literature data parameters of batch bed reactors for the pyrolysis of spent tyres and rubber materials.
| Ref. | Scale | Oil% | Concentrations of Limonene in Pyrolytic Oils | Type of Tyre/Material Particle Size | Type of Reactor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| [ | LSE | 57.5 | 500/12 | 2.6 (D014) | car tyres | granules > 2.7 cm3 | semi-continuous |
| [ | P | 55.0 | 226→510/1.0 | 14.92 | shredded cross-ply tyres (6–12 mm) | semi-continuous gravitational batch transport | |
| [ | T | 97.3 | 500/0.8 | 16.6 | pure polyisoprene 2 cm3 | batch reactor V = 15,000 cm3 | |
| [ | P | 50 | 500/13 | 6.9 | cylindrical particles | semi-continuous rake conveyor pyrolizer | |
|
| |||||||
| [ | L | 64.3 | 425 | 19.3 | tyres 3 g/min (35 g of sand) | fluidized bed | |
| [ | L | 30.48 | 425 | 23.93 | 0.63–1 mm (2 g of sample) | fluidized bed | |
| [ | L | 42.6 | 450 | 9.0 | 1–3 cm2 pieces | fixed bed | |
| [ | L | 50.5 | 500 | 23.9% peak area in oil | size 0.32 mm, | fluidized bed (circulating) | |
| [ | L | 37.8 | 450 | 6904 mg/kg tyre | gas N2 | particle size 4 mm | fixed bed |
| [ | L | 52 | 425 | 50.8% | area (sum of peak for | particle size 4 cm3 (optimal from the viewpoint of oil yield) | fixed bed |
| [ | L | 4.8 | 300 | 21.07% | limonene in oil | particle size | fixed bed |
| [ | L | 57.1 | 570 | 3.6% in oil | particle size | fixed bed (with and without packing glass impingers—imps.) | |
| [ | L | 48.5 ± 2 | 425 | 11.1% peak area in oil | particle feed size 4 cm3 | fixed bed | |
| [ | L | 46 | 475 | 10.95% peak area in oil | bicycle 4 cm3, | fixed bed | |
| [ | 34–46 | 500–550 | 3–4% peak area in oil | 12 kg of particle size 2–6 mm | fixed bed | ||
| [ | 58.15 | 450 | 3.1 | 3 kg of particle size 3 × 1.5 cm | fixed bed | ||
| [ | L | 27.20 | 350 | 7.17 | (5 K/min) | tyre | fixed bed |
| [ | L | 55.0 | 850 | 21.58% | (5 K/min) | tyre crumbs | fixed bed |
| [ | L | 25.0 | 850 | 5.12% | (5 K/min) | tyre crumbs | rotary oven |
| [ | L | 58.4 | 425 | 21.82 | waste truck tire 2.8–3.3 mm | CSBR | |
| [ | L | 38.29 | 500 | 6.65 | tyre | fixed bed | |
| [ | L | 2.5 | 340 |
| one experiment | tyre | auger fluidized bed |
| [ | L | 1.6 | 229 |
| one experiment | tyre | auger fluidized bed |
| [ | L | 40.0 | 500 | 6.02% | truck tire | microwave- | |
| [ | L | 51.0 | 650 | 11.11 | (20 K/min) | light tyres | batch pyrolysis reactor |
| [ | L | 46.6 | 475 |
| Tube and shell condenser | fixed bed | |
| [ | L | 49.2 | 475 |
| Quenching | fixed bed | |
| [ | L | 23.4 | 9 W/g | 9.3 | tyre (d = 0.6 mm) | microwave oven | |
| [ | L | 36 | 10 min | 8.61 | tyre | microwave oven 0–900 W | |
|
| |||||||
| [ | P | 43.0 | 450 | 5.440 | shredded scrap | mechanical (continuous rotary kiln) | |
|
| |||||||
| [ | L | 32.9 | 450/3.5–4 | 11.97 | without catalyst | 100 g tyre granules with 3 g Na2CO3 or NaOH | fixed bed |
|
| |||||||
| [ | 46.97 | 500 | 1.27 (l)/25.53 (d) | without | granulate of used tyres | conical spouted bed | |
| [ | L | 57.9 | 380 | 108.8 mg/gsample | without | pieces of cut rubber gloves measuring 1 cm2, | fixed bed |
| [ | L | 55.8 | 500 | 3.6 | without catalyst | shredded tyre of size 1.0–1.4 mm, | fixed bed 100 mm diameter 150 mm high, 200 g sample, the inert gas was nitrogen |
Figure 6An amount of limonene (%) in oil fraction dependence on the temperature of different pyrolysis process (based on Table 1).
Figure 7The yield of oil fraction (%) dependence on the temperature of the different pyrolysis process (based on Table 1).
Figure 8The yield of limonene (%) in oil fraction dependence on the particle size of waste tyres of different pyrolysis process (based on Table 1).
Comparison of the activation energy of the pyrolysis process of rubber and tyres.
| Ref. | Activation Energy [kJ/mol] | Carrier Gas/Pressure [bar] | Temperature [°C] | Conditions | Material |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 225 ± 5 | N2 | 270–320 | Isothermal | Guayule Rubber in the presence of stearic, oleic, linoleic, and linolenic acid |
| 167 ± 5 | air | 200–265 | Isothermal | ||
| 90 | air | 57–125 | Isothermal | ||
| 239 | N2 and air | Dynamic | |||
| [ | 66.8/44.8/32.9 | N2 | Regions: | 5–20 K/min | Shredded automobile tyres |
| 93.4/78.4/61.1 | 40–50 K/min | ||||
| 52.5/164.5/136.1 | 10–60 K/min | ||||
| 42.0/195.0/204.0 | - | ||||
| 125.7/178.5/243.7 | 30 K/min | ||||
| [ | 131 for isoprene 67 | Ar/10−6 Best-fit model | up to 800 | up to 100 K/min | Truck tyre sample 0.6–0.8 mm |
| 115 dl-limonene 93 | |||||
| 141 for isoprene | Friedman method | ||||
| 145 for dl-limonene | |||||
| 129 for isoprene | Kissinger method | ||||
| 113 for dl-limonene | |||||
| [ | 107.6 for isoprene | from Arrhe-nius equation | 300–700 | Scrap tyre particle size smaller than 0.2 mm. | |
| 96.7 for limonene | |||||
| [ | 68.59a/69.71b | N2 | up to 700 | 5 K/min | Scrap tyre and mixture with |
| 73.54a/83.44b | 10 K/min | ||||
| 76.56a/86.11b | 15 K/min | ||||
| 67.21a/75.63b | 20 K/min | ||||
| Arrhenius (a) and Coats–Redfern (b) methods | |||||
| [ | 125.6 Lump I | He/1 | 420–450 up to 900 | 30 K/min | Granulated tyres |
| 178.7 Lump II | |||||
| 244.1 Lump III | |||||
| [ | 152.0 (evaporation) | molten lead/0.03 | 180–480 | large tyre particle (SBR) | |
| 215.0 (evaporation) | (BR) | ||||
| 207.0 (decomposition) | (SBR) | ||||
| 207.0 (decomposition | (BR) | ||||
| [ | 69.73 (MLR1) | N2 | Up to 700 | 2, 5, 10 and 20 K/min | Waste tyre samples of 10, 20 and 30 mg |
| 118.04 (MLR2) | |||||
| 128.92 (MLR3) | |||||
| Pyrolysis of: MLR1—tyre additives, MLR2—depolymerized rubbers, MLR3—crosslinked/cyclized rubbers | |||||
| [ | 147.25 | 500–600 | Isothermal | 15 mg samples of HDPE | |
| [ | 50.6 ± 4.9c/43.5 ± 3.9d | He | 503, 625 and 723 | Step I | Scrap tyre (1/3 NR, 1/3 SBR and 1/3 carbon black) <0.2 mm |
| 130.8 ± 13c/104.7 ± 9d | Step II | ||||
| 245.9 ± 19c/243.9 ± 21d | Step III | ||||
| 126.7 ± 12c/107.9 ± 8d | NR | ||||
| 201.1 ± 14c/219.6 ± 19d | SBR | ||||
| Pressure (c) 1 bar/(d) 0.25 bar | |||||
| [ | 147.64 | N2 | Up to 1000 | 5, 10, 20 and 30 K/min | Scrap car tyres |
| 148.06 | Scrap truck tyres | ||||
| [ | 65.42e/118.35f/108.85g | N2 | 30–800 | 10 K/min | Bicycle/rickshaw tire |
| 70.45e/138.95f/105.65g | 60 K/min | ||||
| 79.94e/130.25f/110.80g | 10 K/min | Motorcycle tire | |||
| 79.94e/153.45f/99.79g | 60 K/min | ||||
| 74.42e/115.87f/93.89g | 10 K/min | Truck tire | |||
| 78.19e/135.49f/95.45g | 60 K/min | ||||
| Temperature region: (e) low (150–350), (f) medium (285–450) and (g) high (350–500) | |||||
| [ | 43 (oil) | N2 flow rate 150 mL/min | 450–1000 | 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 K/min | Raw scrap tire samples from a commercial recycler (∼1 mm) |
| 207 (NR) | |||||
| 152 (SBR) | |||||
| 215 (BR) | |||||
| [ | 63.08 tyre to gas | N2 flow rate 6.6 L/min, sand | 425, 500, 550 and 610 | Conical spouted bed reactor | Scrap tyre (1/3 natural rubber, 1/3 SBR and 1/3 carbon black) |
| 40.06 tyre to oil | |||||
| 89.26 -||- to aromatics | |||||
| [ | 136.1 | N2 | 350–500 | 10 K/min | Tyre powder (40 mesh) |
| 133.6 | 370–510 | 30 K/min | |||
| 107.0 | 400–540 | 45 K/min | |||
| 99.1 | 410–540 | 60 K/min | |||
| [ | 5.9h/559i | Activation energy evaluated for thermal (h) and catalytic pyrolysis (i) with the use of two types of lumping models; discrete and continuous lumping models. | Literature data of thermal [ | ||
| 2.0h/6.48i | |||||
| 0h/3.48i | |||||
| 2.91h/12.4i | |||||
| –/4.64i | |||||
a Arrhenius method; b Coats–Redfern method; c 1.0 bar pressure; d 0.25 bar pressure; e temperature range: low (150–350); f temperature range: medium (285–450); g temperature range: high (350–500); h thermal pyrolysis; i catalytic pyrolysis.