| Literature DB >> 32191752 |
Watsana Penkhrue1,2, Dieter Jendrossek3, Chartchai Khanongnuch4, Wasu Pathom-Aree1, Tomoyasu Aizawa5,6, Rachel L Behrens7, S Lumyong1,8.
Abstract
Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a biodegradable biopolymer which is useful for various applications including packing, medical and coating materials. An endospore-forming bacterium (strain BP17) was isolated from composted soil and evaluated for PHB production. Strain BP17, taxonomically identified as Bacillus drentensis, showed enhanced PHB accumulation and was selected for further studies. To achieve maximum PHB production, the culture conditions for B. drentensis BP17 were optimized through response surface methodology (RSM) employing central composite rotatable design (CCRD). The final optimum fermentation conditions included: pineapple peel solution, 11.5% (v/v); tryptic soy broth (TSB), 60 g/L; pH, 6.0; inoculum size, 10% (v/v) and temperature, 28°C for 36 h. This optimization yielded 5.55 g/L of PHB compared to the non-optimized condition (0.17 g/L). PHB accumulated by B. drentensis BP17 had a polydispersity value of 1.59 and an average molecular weight of 1.15x105 Da. Thermal analyses revealed that PHB existed as a thermally stable semi-crystalline polymer, exhibiting a thermal degradation temperature of 228°C, a melting temperature of 172°C and an apparent melting enthalpy of fusion of 83.69 J/g. It is evident that B. drentensis strain BP17 is a promising bacterium candidate for PHB production using agricultural waste, such as pineapple peel as a low-cost alternative carbon source for PHB production.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32191752 PMCID: PMC7082031 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 6The melting temperature (Tm), glass transition temperature (Tg), crystallization temperature (Tc) and degradation temperature (Td) of the PHAs obtained from EPPJ (A, B), glucose (C, D) and standard PHB (E, F) after DSC and thermal gravimetric analysis.
Experimental design matrix and responses for optimization of PHAs content using CCRD.
| Run | TSB medium, | EPPJ, | PHAs yield (g/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | |||
| 1 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 0.36 | 0.57 |
| 2 | 100.00 | 5.00 | 1.56 | 2.06 |
| 3 | 18.00 | 20.00 | 1.74 | 1.31 |
| 4 | 100.00 | 20.00 | 0.06 | -0.077 |
| 5 | 1.02 | 12.50 | 0.40 | 0.57 |
| 6 | 116.98 | 12.50 | 0.90 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 59.00 | 1.89 | 2.30 | 1.81 |
| 8 | 59.00 | 23.11 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| 9 | 59.00 | 12.50 | 4.20 | 4.18 |
| 10 | 59.00 | 12.50 | 4.00 | 4.18 |
| 11 | 59.00 | 12.50 | 3.88 | 4.18 |
| 12 | 59.00 | 12.50 | 4.40 | 4.18 |
| 13 | 59.00 | 12.50 | 4.40 | 4.18 |
TSB medium was purchased from Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA.
EPPJ = Extracted pineapple juice.
Effect of various media and carbon sources on PHAs production by Bacillus drentensis BP17 after 72 h at 30°C under shaking (150 rpm).
| Nutrient source | PHAs yield (g/L) |
|---|---|
| Nutrient broth (NB) | 0.55±0.002h |
| Casein yeast magnesium broth (CYM) | 2.35±0.025d |
| Trypticase soy broth (TSB) | 3.53±0.004a |
| Glucose broth (GB) | 0.13±0.001i |
| Luria Bertani broth (LB) | 2.72±0.001b |
| Peptone water (PW) | 0.06±0.002j |
| Potato dextrose broth (PDB) | 1.32±0.000f |
| Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) | 2.22±0.009e |
| Yeast extract-peptone dextrose broth (YPD) | 2.55±0.001c |
| Yeast and mold broth (YM) | 0.90±0.001g |
| Minimal salt medium (MSM) | 0.17±0.018i |
| Peptone broth (PEP) | 0.10±0.003i |
| Glucose | 2.42±0.042b |
| Fructose | 2.04±0.305c |
| Sucrose | 2.77±0.205b |
| Dragon fruit peel | 0.52±0.018d |
| Apple peel | 1.14±0.057d |
| Pineapple peel | 3.44±0.082a |
| Mango peel | 2.04±0.071d |
| Sugarcane peel | 0.56±0.028d |
| Banana peel | 0.36±0.020d |
The mean and standard error per treatment were calculated from technical and biological triplicates. Lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 5% probability level. Significant differences were analyzed by the Duncan test, using SPSS 17.0.
ANOVA analysis of TSB medium and extracted pineapple peel juice (EPPJ) effects on PHAs production after fitting with response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Coefficient | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 35.28 | 5 | 7.06 | 40.18 | < 0.0001 | |
| 0.028 | 0.006 | 1 | 0.006 | 0.037 | 0.8535 | |
| -0.35 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.98 | 5.61 | 0.0497 | |
| -0.72 | 2.07 | 1 | 2.07 | 11.81 | 0.0109 | |
| -1.78 | 22.05 | 1 | 22.05 | 125.59 | < 0.0001 | |
| -1.43 | 14.24 | 1 | 14.24 | 81.07 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 1.23 | 7 | 0.17 | |||
| | 1.01 | 3 | 0.34 | 6.13 | 0.0561 | |
| | 0.22 | 4 | 0.055 | |||
| Cor Total | 36.51 | 12 |
Standard deviation = 0.42; mean = 2.20; coefficient of variance (C.V. %) = 19.05; PRESS = 7.52; R-squared = 0.9663;
Adj R-squared = 0.9423; Pred R-squared = 0.7939; Adeq Precision = 14.941