| Literature DB >> 32190723 |
Zheyuan Liu1, Qingping Li2, Jin Fu1, Mingjun Yang1, Jiafei Zhao1.
Abstract
Data on particle removal from surfaces is yet to be presented properly. This data is explored and the mathematical models are presented in the previous paper "New model for particle removal from surface in presence of deformed liquid bridge" [1], which predict the fluid velocity required to initiate the motion of a particle. However, the models still need to be verified by the experiment. The experimental data in this paper measured the critical fluid flow velocity when the particles were about to removal from the surface. The particle removal including the process without the effect of liquid bridge and the process with the existence of liquid bridge. Different diameter of the silica particles were used to measured the critical fluid flow velocity without the liquid bridge. In addition, with the existing of the liquid bridge, the same diameter of the silica particles and the ice particles were used to researched the critical state. The data has implications in furthering the understanding of the underlying mechanisms during the removal of particles from surfaces exposed to fluid flow.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesion; Liquid bridge; Particle removal; Surface
Year: 2020 PMID: 32190723 PMCID: PMC7068622 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
The nomenclatures and the values in the experiments.
| Nomenclature | Unit | Values in the experiment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Particle radius | m | / | |
| Liquid bridge length | m | / | |
| Embracing angle | ° | / | |
| Contact angle | ° | / | |
| Front angle | ° | / | |
| Rear angle | ° | / | |
| Fluid density | kg/m3 | N2:1.23(0 °C); 1.15(20 °C) | |
| Particle density | kg/m3 | Silica:2650; Ice:900 | |
| Fluid bulk velocity | m/s | / | |
| Interfacial tension | N/m | Water:0.0755(0 °C); 0.0727(20 °C) | |
| Fluid dynamic viscosity | N·s/m2 | N2: 1.66 × 10−5(0 °C); 1.76 × 10−5(20 °C) | |
| Fluid kinematic viscosity | m2/s | N2: 1.35 × 10−5(0 °C); 1.53 × 10−5(20 °C) | |
| Reynolds number | / | Silica:5155∼9860; Ice:8291∼13004 | |
| Capillary number | / | Silica:8.28 × 10−4∼1.22 × 10−3; Ice:8.20 × 10−4∼1.26 × 10−3 | |
| Liquid bridge shape parameter | / | Range:1/2∼π/2; | |
| Friction coefficient | / | ||
Fig. 1The changing of critical velocity with different particle diameter.
The silica particle contact angles and embracing angles at critical condition.
| Liquid bridge volume (μL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 2 | 54° | 15° | 3.456 |
| 1.0 | 2 | 45° | 17° | 3.426 |
| 1.5 | 2 | 42° | 23° | 3.642 |
| 2.0 | 2 | 33° | 30° | 3.766 |
| 2.5 | 2 | 23° | 28° | 3.827 |
| 3.0 | 2 | 22° | 36° | 3.858 |
| 3.5 | 2 | 27° | 30° | 4.506 |
| 4.0 | 2 | 41° | 33° | 4.383 |
| 4.5 | 2 | 42° | 38° | 4.136 |
| 5.0 | 2 | 25° | 36° | 4.445 |
| 5.5 | 2 | 16° | 37° | 4.138 |
| 6.0 | 2 | 26° | 35° | 4.198 |
| 6.5 | 2 | 20° | 37° | 4.506 |
| 7.0 | 2 | 23° | 39° | 4.383 |
| 7.5 | 2 | 28° | 39° | 4.846 |
| 8.0 | 2 | 16° | 38° | 4.753 |
| 8.5 | 2 | 34° | 35° | 4.756 |
| 9.0 | 2 | 21° | 42° | 4.815 |
| 9.5 | 2 | 20° | 39° | 4.661 |
| 10.0 | 2 | 17° | 41° | 5.031 |
The ice particle front angles, rear angles and the liquid bridge length along the surface at critical condition.
| Liquid bridge volume (μL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 2.177 | 116° | 60° | 3.323 | 3.735 |
| 1.0 | 2.311 | 110° | 61° | 3.204 | 3.881 |
| 1.5 | 2.451 | 108° | 58° | 3.545 | 4.599 |
| 2.0 | 2.393 | 116° | 61° | 3.544 | 4.661 |
| 2.5 | 2.451 | 116° | 58° | 4.246 | 4.691 |
| 3.0 | 2.089 | 113° | 57° | 4.186 | 4.877 |
| 3.5 | 2.225 | 117° | 53° | 4.346 | 5.031 |
| 4.0 | 1.961 | 120° | 57° | 4.345 | 5.185 |
| 4.5 | 2.155 | 121° | 59° | 4.321 | 5.371 |
| 5.0 | 2.215 | 126° | 55° | 4.597 | 5.432 |
| 5.5 | 2.223 | 127° | 56° | 4.466 | 5.253 |
| 6.0 | 2.253 | 128° | 57° | 4.349 | 5.185 |
| 6.5 | 2.175 | 128° | 57° | 4.446 | 5.188 |
| 7.0 | 2.069 | 139° | 45° | 4.575 | 5.463 |
| 7.5 | 2.074 | 133° | 47° | 4.852 | 5.371 |
| 8.0 | 1.853 | 128° | 48° | 4.958 | 5.709 |
| 8.5 | 2.343 | 128° | 51° | 5.304 | 5.494 |
| 9.0 | 2.377 | 115° | 60° | 5.617 | 5.525 |
| 9.5 | 2.301 | 124° | 55° | 5.518 | 5.339 |
| 10.0 | 2.232 | 118° | 51° | 5.838 | 5.667 |
Fig. 2The experiment device for the fluid bulk velocity measurement in the particle removal process.
Specifications Table
| Subject | Physics and Astronomy; Surfaces and Interfaces |
| Specific subject area | Particle removal and adhesion |
| Type of data | Table |
| How data were acquired | The experiment data were acquired by the particle removal parameters measurement device. The gas flow velocity values were measured by the gas flow meter (Sierra, USA, measurement range: 0–700 m³/h, measurement accuracy: ±0.1%). The contact angles were measured by the CCD camera. |
| Data format | Raw |
| Parameters for data collection | For collection data: Critical fluid bulk velocity, Particle radius, Liquid bridge length, Embracing angle, Contact angle, Front angle, Rear angle and Liquid bridge volume. |
| Description of data collection | For the experiments in presence of liquid bridge, a small amount volume of liquid was dropped on the surface. And the particle was placed embraced by the liquid droplet. The critical flow velocity was measured when the particle was about to removal from surface with the fluid flow velocity increasing gradually. The critical state of the particle was photographed by the CCD camera. |
| Data source location | Institution: Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education in Dalian University of Technology, No.2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District. |
| Data accessibility | With the article. |
| Related research article | Zheyuan Liu, Jin Fu, Mingjun Yang, Jiafei Zhao and Yongchen Song. “New model for particle removal from surface in presence of deformed liquid bridge.” |
The data could verify the model for particles removal from the surface, even the particles in presence of the deformed liquid bridge. The data could help explaining the different forms of the detachment between particles, liquid bridge and surface. It would further improve the mathematical model. The data may be useful for other groups working or studying on the particle removal process. And making the researched further used in microelectronics, pneumatic conveying, aviation and flow assurance fields. |