| Literature DB >> 32190537 |
Yuyang Li1,2, Jia Li3, Jingchun Sun3, Yingkun Liu2,3, Dingkun Liu2,4, Liuyi Du1,2, Bizhou Wang2,4, Weiwei Liu3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the expression of RAD51 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and analyze its connection with pathological grade, clinical stage, and lymphatic metastasis potential.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32190537 PMCID: PMC7072096 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1827676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) ISSN: 2210-7177 Impact factor: 2.916
Gender and clinical data about OSCC patients.
| Variables | # of patients | % of patients |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 55 | 74.3 |
| Female | 19 | 25.7 |
| Histological grade | ||
| Well | 21 | 28.4 |
| Moderate | 32 | 43.2 |
| Poor | 21 | 28.4 |
| Clinical stage | ||
| I | 14 | 18.9 |
| II | 14 | 18.9 |
| III | 22 | 29.7 |
| IV | 24 | 32.5 |
| Lymphatic metastasis | ||
| No | 53 | 71.6 |
| Yes | 21 | 28.4 |
RAD51 expression in OSCC patients.
| Variables | Positive number (%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.275 | |
| Male | 26 (47.3) | |
| Female | 7 (36.8) | |
| Property | < 0.05 | |
| Oral mucosa | 3 (20) | |
| OSCC | 33 (44.6) | |
| Skin | 7 (63.6) | |
| Histological grade | < 0.05 | |
| Well | 5 (23.8) | |
| Moderate | 14 (43.8) | |
| Poor | 14 (66.7) | |
| Clinical stage | 0.055 | |
| I + II | 9 (32.1) | |
| III + IV | 24 (52.2) | |
| Lymphatic metastasis | 0.027 | |
| Yes | 13 (59.1) | |
| No | 20 (38.5) |
Figure 1Expression of RAD51 in OSCC tissues (×400). RAD51 expression was lower in normal tissues than in OSCC tissues (P < 0.05). RAD51 was highest in the poorly differentiated OSCC tissues and lowest in the well-differentiated OSCC when compared with the healthy control tissues (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Expressions of RAD51 in different cell lines. Western blot analysis showed the RAD51 expression was highest in the HaCaT cells, followed by TSCC cells (CAL-27 and SCC-9), and oral mucosal epithelial cells.
RAD51 expression is linked to dismal patient survival and patient relapse.
| Variables | Number of patients (%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Death | 18 (47.4) | 0.036 |
| Relapse | 19 (50) | 0.052 |
| Relapse with radiotherapy | 13 (43.3) | 0.047 |
| Relapse without radiotherapy | 6 (75) | |
| Well-differentiated | 3 (15.8) | <0.01 |
| Moderately differentiated | 12 (63.1) | 0.073 |
| Poorly differentiated | 4 (21.1) | 0.024 |