Literature DB >> 32189942

Acetabular reconstruction with a custom-made triflange acetabular component through direct anterior approach - A case report.

Anthony Van Eemeren1, Jan Vanlommel2, Maxence Vandekerckhove1.   

Abstract

Complex acetabular reconstruction sometimes requires the use of a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC). In this article we describe the surgical technique to achieve its implantation through the direct anterior approach (DAA). Meanwhile we report on our first aMace® CTAC placement in revision total hip arthroplasty through the DAA. Most procedures concerning the implantation of a CTAC are performed through the posterolateral approach to obtain adequate exposure. However, literature reports a high overall dislocation rate of 14% using this approach for revision hip arthroplasty. Because of the documented lower dislocation rate and a faster early rehabilitation of procedures performed through DAA, we considered to implant this vast acetabular reconstruction component through the same approach we use for our primary and standard revision cases. In collaboration with the engineers, the design and the screw direction were adapted to the DAA. We used a standard DAA with longitudinal incision and had no difficulty to successfully implant the CTAC in the desired implant position.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular reconstruction; Custom-made triflange acetabular component; Direct anterior approach; Pelvic discontinuity; Revision hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 32189942      PMCID: PMC7068004          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  11 in total

1.  Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.

Authors:  M J Christie; S A Barrington; M F Brinson; M E Ruhling; D K DeBoer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.

Authors:  Michael J Taunton; Thomas K Fehring; Paul Edwards; Thomas Bernasek; Ginger E Holt; Michael J Christie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?

Authors:  Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Erin L Ruh; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  In-Hospital Morbidity and Postoperative Revisions After Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Lazaros A Poultsides; Anthony Salvatore; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency.

Authors:  Atul B Joshi; Jonathan Lee; Cecil Christensen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ginger E Holt; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Outcomes of Custom Flange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty and Predictors of Failure.

Authors:  Brian T Barlow; Kathryn K Oi; Yuo-Yu Lee; Alberto V Carli; Daniel S Choi; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series.

Authors:  Katsuya Nakata; Masataka Nishikawa; Koji Yamamoto; Shigeaki Hirota; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results.

Authors:  M E Berend; K R Berend; A V Lombardi; H Cates; P Faris
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  1 in total

1.  Acetabular defect management and revision arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Kristoff Corten; Tyler Goldberg; Maximilian Rudert; Michael Nogler; Joseph Moskal; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 1.154

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.