Literature DB >> 26742903

Outcomes of Custom Flange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty and Predictors of Failure.

Brian T Barlow1, Kathryn K Oi1, Yuo-Yu Lee2, Alberto V Carli1, Daniel S Choi3, Mathias P Bostrom1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Custom triflange acetabular components (CTAC) have become more popular in the treatment of Paprosky type IIIB defects with an average survivorship of 80% at 4 years. Many studies report survivorship of CTAC, but radiographic parameters of CTAC success or failure have not been previously reported. The purpose of the study was to assess radiographic and patient factors predictive of failure in CTAC.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 63 patients with >24 months of follow-up was completed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between failed vs successful CTAC using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher exact test, respectively.
RESULTS: The failure rate of the CTAC was 13.5% over an average follow-up of 4.32 years (±2.94). Patients had a mean of 2 revisions (range, 0-11) before CTAC implantation. Compared with the contralateral hip center of rotation, the failed CTAC group tended to lateralize the hip center by a mean of 18.29 mm (±11.90 mm) compared to a mean of 9.86 mm (±11.89) in the intact group, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .1029). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function score improved from 38.94 (±14.23) to 71.35 (±21.96) at most recent follow-up (P = .0002). The Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were not significantly different between intact and failed CTAC groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CTAC tends to lateralize the hip center by approximately 1 cm, and there is a trend toward nearly 2 cm of lateralization in the small subset of failed CTAC. Future efforts should focus on medializing the hip center in CTAC to improve ingrowth and survivorship.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paprosky IIIB bone loss; custom triflange acetabular component; radiographic outcomes; revision hip arthroplasty; severe acetabular defect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26742903     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Acetabular reconstruction with a custom-made triflange acetabular component through direct anterior approach - A case report.

Authors:  Anthony Van Eemeren; Jan Vanlommel; Maxence Vandekerckhove
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-02-14

2.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

3.  3D Printed Acetabular Components for Complex Revision Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angela Yao; Daniel Mark George; Vijai Ranawat; Chris John Wilson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Customised three-dimensional printed revision acetabular implant for large defect after failed triflange revision cup.

Authors:  Stefano Zanasi; Hassan Zmerly
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-25

Review 5.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Timothy Wright; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Alexander Gu; Mathias Bostrom; Fares Haddad; Seth Jerabek; Michael Bolognesi; Thomas Fehring; Alejandro Gonzalez DellaValle; William Jiranek; William Walter; Wayne Paprosky; Donald Garbuz; Thomas Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-09-28

6.  A novel revision system for complex pelvic defects utilizing 3D-printed custom prosthesis.

Authors:  Yongqiang Hao; Dinghao Luo; Junxiang Wu; Lei Wang; Kai Xie; Mengning Yan; Kerong Dai; Yongqiang Hao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Qiuyuan Wang; Qi Wang; Pei Liu; Juncheng Ge; Qidong Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Weiguo Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 8.  Three-dimensional-printing Technology in Hip and Pelvic Surgery: Current Landscape.

Authors:  Seong-Hwan Woo; Myung-Jin Sung; Kyung-Soon Park; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2020-02-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.