Literature DB >> 32188403

Sexual-biased gene expression of olfactory-related genes in the antennae of Conogethes pinicolalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

Dapeng Jing1,2, Tiantao Zhang3, Shuxiong Bai1, Kanglai He1, Sivaprasath Prabu1, Junbo Luan2, Zhenying Wang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conogethes pinicolalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), is similar to Conogethes punctiferalis (yellow peach moth) and its host plant is gymnosperms, especially for masson pine. So far, less literature was reported on this pest. In the present study, we sequenced and characterized the antennal transcriptomes of male and female C. pinicolalis for the first time.
RESULTS: Totally, 26 odorant-binding protein (OBP) genes, 19 chemosensory protein (CSP) genes, 55 odorant receptor (OR) genes and 20 ionotropic receptor (IR) genes were identified from the C. pinicolalis antennae transcriptome and amino sequences were annotated against homologs of C. punctiferalis. The neighbor-joining tree indicated that the amino acid sequence of olfactory related genes is highly homologous with C. punctiferalis. Furthermore, the reference genes were selected, and we recommended the phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) or ribosomal protein 49 gene (RP49) to verify the target gene expression during larval development stages and RP49 or ribosomal protein L13 gene (RPL13) for adult tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a starting point on the molecular level characterization between C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferalis, which might be supportive for pest management studies in future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conogethes pinicolalis; Conogethes punctiferalis; GOBP; OBP; PBP; RNA-Seq; Transcriptome; Transcriptomics; Yellow peach moth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32188403      PMCID: PMC7081556          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6648-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Olfaction system plays a key role in insects, which includes kin recognition, mediating foraging, aggregation, toxic compound avoidance and oviposition behaviors. However, the olfaction is a complex network that contains odorant-binding proteins (OBP), odorant receptors (OR), chemosensory proteins (CSP), sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs), ionotropic receptors (IR) and odorant degrading enzymes (ODEs). They form a functional network with each other in detecting different odorants types, thus complete the odorants recognition process [1, 2]. In Lepidoptera, OBPs are composed of pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs), general odorant-binding proteins (GOBPs) and antennal binding proteins (ABPs), and they combined to detect a wide range of odors and transport hydrophobic odorants to the ORs or IRs [3]. The functions of CSPs are also similar to OBPs, localized in the lymph of trochoid sensilla [4]. IRs or ORs are localized on the dendrite of the chemosensory neuron, which can transform the chemical signals from OBPs or CSPs into an electric signal and transmit to the brain [5, 6]. The SNMPs and ODEs are regarded to trigger ligand delivery to the receptor and terminate the signal stimulation, respectively [6]. Conogethes pinicolalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), is a sibling species of Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Morphological features of C. pinicolalis egg, larva, pupa and adult resemble those of C. punctiferalis and it is considered as same species. In 1963, Koizumi firstly identified the C. pinicolalis as an another type of yellow peach moth and classified as pinaceae-feeding type (PFT) [7]. Later, Honda and Mitsuhashi identified and distinguished the difference between these pests in the adults, larvae and pupal stages [8]; Konno et al. reported that they were different species from their response to different spectra of host-plant constituents [9]; In 2006, the pinaceae-feeding type was named as C. pinicolalis [10]. Though these studies have provided important information regarding the identification of species, it is not entirely reliable because these insect groups were undergoing speciation, genomic changes, or evolving into new taxon [11]. Therefore, for its high reliability, molecular characterization technique can serve as a complementary method for further analysis. Especially, DNA sequencing and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been successfully used to deal with the species uncertainty in morphological taxonomy [12-14]. For example, Shashank integration of conventional taxonomy, DNA bar code and others methods successfully confirmed the difference in populations of Conogethes which reared on castor and cardamom in India [11]. Furthermore, Wang et al. used mitochondrial DNA sequencing technique to verify C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferalis were significantly different species [15]. C. pinicolalis is a typical oligophagous pest that can only feed on Pinus massoniana (masson pine) and few pine trees. However, as a sibling species, C. punctiferalis, is a polyphagous pest that can infest hundreds of plants [9, 16]. High-throughput sequencing technology can provide us with a lot of data and it has greatly promoted the research on entomology [17, 18]. In this study, we analyzed the difference of male and female antennae transcriptome and identified the olfactory genes from Gene Ontology (GO) annotation as well as sets of putative OBPs, CSPs, ORs and IRs in C. pinicolalis. Furthermore, we compared the difference of the genes with C. punctiferalis. These results provide basically data for the study of C. pinicolalis olfactory genes, also may help to better understand the genetic evolution between these two sibling species.

Results

Overall sequence analysis

A total of 78,199,136 and 75,969,652 raw reads were obtained from male and female antennae, respectively. We obtained 77,254,390 and 74,994,240 clean reads from male and female antennae after trimming adapter sequences, eliminating low-quality reads, and N represented sequences. A total of 98,214 unigenes were obtained with an average length of 815 bp and with a N50 of 2968 (Table 1). The raw reads of the C. pinicolalis are available from the SRA database (accession number: SRX5250688, SRX5250689, SRX5250690, SRX5250691, SRX5250692 and SRX5250693).
Table 1

Summary of assembled contigs and unigenes

Type (bp)ContigsUnigenes
Total number121,65098,214
Total length160,640,609154,441,888
Min length201201
Mean length568815
Maximum length25,85625,856
N5028252968
N90467612
Summary of assembled contigs and unigenes

Functional annotation of the C. pinicolalis antennal unigenes

In total, 98,214 unigenes were successfully annotated in all databases (Table 2), including 47,089 (47.94%) unigenes matched to known proteins and 33,852 unigenes (34.46%) in the Swiss-Prot database. GO analysis was used to classify the biological process, molecular function and cellular components (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). Under the molecular function category, the genes expressed in the antennae were mostly related to binding, catalytic activity and transporter activity (Additional file 1: Figure S1B). From the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation, 10,298 unigenes were classified into five groups, cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, metabolism and organismal systems (Additional file 1: Figure S1C).
Table 2

Summary of annotations of unigenes

Type (bp)Number of UnigenesPercentage (%)
Annotated in NR47,08947.94
Annotated in NT31,12431.68
Annotated in KO18,77419.11
Annotated in SwissProt33,85234.46
Annotated in PFAM37,71038.39
Annotated in GO37,88238.57
Annotated in KOG19,47419.82
Annotated in all Databases89679.13
Annotated in at least one Database59,76460.85
Total Unigenes98,214100
Summary of annotations of unigenes

Olfactory-related genes in the C. pinicolalis antennae

Totally, 26 OBP genes, 19 CSP genes, 55 OR genes and 20 IR genes were identified from the C. pinicolalis antennae (Additional file 2: Table S1). Among the identified OBP genes, we found 4 PBP, 2 GOBP and 20 other kinds of OBP genes. Furthermore, OBP and CSP genes are detected in male and female antennae and showed the significant differences in genes abundance (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). Interestingly, PBP2, OBP13 and OBP15 are male biased expression, whereas the other PBPs (PBP1, PBP3 and PBP4), as well as GOBPs (GOBP1 and GOBP2) are female bias expression. Furthermore, two of the other OBPs (OBP7 and OBP9) remained female biased expression (Fig. 1a). CSP genes (CSP4, CSP5, CSP14, CSP11 and CSP17) showed female biased expression and significantly different from the male (Fig. 1b), Other insignificantly expressed genes were shown in Additional file 2: Table S1.
Fig. 1

Scatter plots showing the differential regulation of OBP and CSP genes in male and female C. pinicolalis antennae. Transcripts that exhibit significant differences in abundance (P < 0.05), are color-coded according to their weighted fold change (FC). The expression levels are shown as the mean Log10 (TPM + 1) for all of the three biological replicates for both sexes

Scatter plots showing the differential regulation of OBP and CSP genes in male and female C. pinicolalis antennae. Transcripts that exhibit significant differences in abundance (P < 0.05), are color-coded according to their weighted fold change (FC). The expression levels are shown as the mean Log10 (TPM + 1) for all of the three biological replicates for both sexes In OR gene sets, 7 pheromones receptors (PRs) and 47 other ORs were identified in male and female antennae. Three PR genes (OR1, OR3 and OR6), as well as OR34, showed significantly higher expression in male antennae. However, a large number of ORs (about 18 genes) were significantly higher expression in female antennae. Especially the OR48 and OR53, are highly expressed in female antennae with differential fold change (FC) > 5. Six ORs with 2.0 < FC < 5.0 (P < 0.05) and eight ORs with 1.5 < FC < 2.0 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2a). Three IR genes (IR75p2, IR75d and IR4) showed female biased expression (p < 0.05) and other four genes (IR2, IR75p2, IR75p, and IR64a) were male biased expression (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2

Scatter plots showing the differential regulation of OBP and CSP genes in male and female C. pinicolalis antennae. Transcripts that exhibit significant differences in abundance (P < 0.05), are color-coded according to their weighted fold change (FC). The expression levels are shown as the mean Log10 (TPM + 1) for all of the three biological replicates for both sexes

Scatter plots showing the differential regulation of OBP and CSP genes in male and female C. pinicolalis antennae. Transcripts that exhibit significant differences in abundance (P < 0.05), are color-coded according to their weighted fold change (FC). The expression levels are shown as the mean Log10 (TPM + 1) for all of the three biological replicates for both sexes Significantly expressed genes were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Expressions of female biased genes from class OBP (PBP1, PBP3, PBP4, GOBP1, GOBP2, OBP6, OBP7 and OBP9) were enormously consistent with the transcripts per kilobase million (TMP) values.. The same results were obtained in the expression of CSPs, ORs and IRs (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic trees were constructed by using 95 OBPs, 157 ORs, 89 CSPs and 59 IRs from different species of Lepidoptera (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Figure S3). The GOBP/PBP genes sequences include six subgroups (GOBP1 and 2, PBP1–4) formed a conserved order (Fig. 3). Furthermore, OBPs, CSPs, ORs and IRs showed a very close relationship with C. punctiferlis, only a few CSPs and IRs clustered with other insects (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Figure S3). Most of the olfactory related genes showed more than 90% identity. Moreover, 4 OBP, 5 OR, 2 IR and 2 CSP genes had 99% sequence similarity with the C. punctiferlis (Table 3). ORs and IRs genes indicated the Ostrinia furnacalis is the next close neighbor in the same clade. On the other hand, OBPs and CSPs genes showed Cnaphalocrocis medinalisin in the same clade as a close neighbor after C. punctiferlis. Olfactory-related genes in Bombyx mori showed gene divergence when compared with these two sibling species.
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic relationship of olfactory-related gene from C. pinicolalis and other insects. Red font represents the genes from C. pinicolalis; Cpun, Ofur, Bmor and Cmed are the abbreviation of C. punctiferalis, O. furnacalis, B. mori and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, respectively

Table 3

Percentage identity of OBP, OR, IR and CSP gene family in C. pinicolalis with the sibling C. punctiferalis

Gene familyGene namesC. pinicolalis access No.C. punctiferalis access No.ScoreE-value% IdentityGene familyGene namesC. pinicolalis access No.C. punctiferalis access No.ScoreE-value% Identity
Odorant-binding proteinsOBP2MK458342KF0260553063e-10297Odorant receptorsOR27MK458386KX084477740099
OBP3MK458343KF0260562105e −6796OR28MK458387KX084478586094
OBP4MK458344KP9852222782e-9174OR29MK458388KX084479734088
OBP5MK458345KP9852231806e-9499OR31MK458390KX084481564083
OBP6MK458346KP9852242492e-7996OR32MK458391KX084482712093
OBP7MK458347ALC765472882e-9597OR33MK458392KX084483774099
OBP8MK458348KP9852261931e-9495OR34MK458393KX0844844441e-15363
OBP9MK458349KY1304633302e-11298OR35MK458394KX084485882099
OBP10MK458350KY1304642511e-8299OR36MK458395KX0844864093e-9893
OBP11MK458351KY1304652804e-8994OR37MK458396KX084487735096
OBP12MK458352KY1304662212e-5098OR38MK458397KX084488657078
OBP13MK458353KY1304671241e-3488OR41MK458400KX084491644093
OBP14MK458354KY1304692712e-3495OR42MK458401KX084492686092
OBP15MK458355KY1304702971e-9798OR43MK458402KX084493581096
OBP16MK458356KY1304722263e-7297OR44MK458403KX084494684086
OBP17MK458357KY1304733073e-10498OR45MK458404KX0844955083e-17563
OBP18MK458358KY1304743535e-11599OR47MK458406KX0844972994e-10099
OBP19MK458359KY1304752521e-8297OR48MK458407KX0844984371e-14879
GOBP1MK458335KY1304682973e-10095OR49MK458408KX0844991143e-2391
GOBP2MK458336KT9838121914e-5799OR50MK458409KX084500800094
PBP1MK458337MH0066041922e-5997OR51MK458410KX084501647093
PBP2MK458338KP9852281905e-3395OR52MK458411KX084502728091
PBP3MK458339KP9852293381e-10095OR53MK458412KX084503691090
PBP4MK458340KP9852273293e-10693OR54MK458413KX084504853092
Odorant receptorsOR1MK458361KX084452890095OR55MK458414KX084505839094
OR2MK458362KX084453952099OR56MK458415KX084506690089
OR3MK458363KX084454641094ionotropic receptorsIR3MK458418KX0845111299099
OR4MK458364KX084455868092IR4MK458419KX0845121057098
OR5MK458365KX084456758095IR5MK458420KX0845131484081
OR6MK458366KX084457805095IR6MK458421KX0845141348081
OR7MK458367KX084458555090IR7MK458422KX0845151089097
OR8MK458368KX0844593393e-11077IR25aMK458424KX0945081797099
OR10MK458369KX0844616565e-16587Chemosensory proteinsCSP1MK574125KF0260491541e-4196
OR11MK458370KX084462683097CSP2MK574126KF0260502598e-7896
OR12MK458371KX084463664093CSP3MK574127KY1304771911e-6090
OR13MK458372KX084464752096CSP4MK574128KF0260572265e-6996
OR14MK458373KX084465798097CSP5MK574129KF0260582461e-7898
OR15MK458374KX084466673090CSP6MK574130KF0260512281e-6797
OR16MK458375KX084467794091CSP7MK574131KF0260522011e-5997
OR17MK458376KX084468790098CSP8MK574132KF0260531723e-5399
OR18MK458377KX084469786095CSP9MK574133KY1304802415e-7896
OR19MK458378KX084470726089CSP10MK574134KY1304791978e-7199
OR20MK458379KX084471729096CSP11MK574135KY1304802192e-5996
OR21MK458380KX0844725363e-17877CSP13MK574137KY1304822062e-6488
OR23MK458382KX084473730093CSP14MK574138KY1304832283e-7192
OR24MK458383KX084474897098CSP15MK574139KY1304842374e-7694
OR25MK458384KX084475833093
Phylogenetic relationship of olfactory-related gene from C. pinicolalis and other insects. Red font represents the genes from C. pinicolalis; Cpun, Ofur, Bmor and Cmed are the abbreviation of C. punctiferalis, O. furnacalis, B. mori and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, respectively Percentage identity of OBP, OR, IR and CSP gene family in C. pinicolalis with the sibling C. punctiferalis

Reference genes selection

The gene stability results obtained from both the software seems to be similar (Fig. 4). In the adult tissues (antanna, head, throax, abdomen, leg and wings) ribosomal protein 49 gene (RP49) and ribosomal protein L13 gene (RPL13) showed more stability than GADPH gene, and Actin gene was unstable (Fig. 4b and d). However, RPL13 performed unstable in different development stages of the C. pinicolalis. The results of GeNorm software showed that Actin and phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) are the most stable gene (Fig. 2a); while NormFinder software considered RP49 to be the most stable gene (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4

Stability analysis of candidate reference genes in different developmental stages (a, c) and different adult tissues (b, d) of C. pinicolalis

Stability analysis of candidate reference genes in different developmental stages (a, c) and different adult tissues (b, d) of C. pinicolalis

Discussion

The application of next-generation sequencing technology in the field of entomology has greatly promoted the efficiency and quantity of gene annotation [19]. Meantime, a lot of antennal transcriptomes olfactory-related genes were identified [20-22]. In this research, we identified 26 OBP genes, 19 CSP genes, 55 OR genes and 20 IR genes from the C. pinicolalis antennal transcriptome, these genes have been reported for the first time in this species. C. pinicolalis is a sibling species of C. punctiferlis, and had ever been recognized as the same species [10]. In C. punctiferlis, totally 25 OBPs, 15 CSPs, 62 ORs and 10 IRs were identified from antennae transcriptome [23], and the numbers of OBPs, CSPs and ORs are similar with C. pinicolalis, whereas more IRs were identified from the C. pinicolalis antennal transcriptome dataset, this may depend on the depth of the sequencing. The sequence similarity of olfactory-related genes was analyzed and shown in the evolution tree (Fig. 3, Table 3), OBP, CSP, OR and IR genes sequences showed high similarity with C. punctiferlis. Most of the identities are more than 90%. 4 OBP, 5 OR, 2 IR and 2 CSP genes had 99% sequence similarity with the C. punctiferlis (Table 3). These two pests were first identified by Koizumi et al. [7] and classified into pinaceae-feeding type (PFT) and fruit-feeding type (FFT) based on their feeding habits and morphological characters. They were later named as C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferalis [10]. Further investigation revealed their behaviors, morphologies, and feeding patterns, and indicated reproductive isolation between these two types [9, 16, 18]. Wang et al. have shown that the C. pinicolalis was different from that of C. punciferalis through mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunits I, II and cytochrome b gene sequences [15]. The phylogenetic tree also revealed an evolutionary relationship with other Lepidopteran species. The GOBP/PBP genes sequences include six subgroups (GOBP1 and 2, PBP1–4) formed a conserved order (Fig. 3). ORs and IRs genes indicated the Ostrinia furnacalis is also the close neighbor in the same clade (Additional file 1: Figure S3). On the other hand, OBPs and CSPs genes showed Cnaphalocrocis medinalisin in the same clade as a close neighbor after C. punctiferlis. Olfactory-related genes in Bombyx mori showed gene divergence when compared with these two sibling species. Menken et al. [24] suggested the two major transitions in the evolution of larval (Lepidoptera) feeding, switching from litter-feeding to herbivory. Larvae feeding on leaf-litter from a single dominant tree species would have been the main precursor for evolving from litter-feeding to leaf-mining type. In the course of evolution, leaf-mining type gained the new type of enzymatic system to digest the nutritious freshly fallen leaves. Once this evolved niche had been acquired the ability of leaf-mining and with the special digestive system could apparently exploit the diversity more and larval feeding mode had evolved in searching of new host-plants [25]. Insects olfaction system allows them to recognize and track the volatile cues from host-plant, mating and evade from their predators. The polyphagous insects significantly adapted to recognize, digest and detoxify a large variety of host-plants. Polyphagous insects must handle the defensive toxic molecules (secondary metabolites) produced by the host-plant. Genes from the moth pheromone glands could have evolved and altered the normal fatty acid metabolism [26]. In a previous study, experiments proved the major change in the pheromone blend in various moth species, the existence of different desaturase from mRNA in the moth pheromone gland [27]. In Spodoptera frugiperda, due to tandem duplications within a single region of the genome 10 OBP genes expansion was observed when compared with B. mori. In the same study, the author showed a difference in IRs gene count between the strains, S. frugiperda corn strain had 42 IRs and rice strain had 43 IRs [28]. Similarly, in our study C. pinicolalis had 10 more IRs when compared with C. punctiferlis. Evidently, the selection of host plant is also a reason that leads to gene duplications, insertions or deletions when there is a need to adapt to an environment. As in other insects [29-31] OBPs and CSPs were detected in the antennae of both male and female (Additional file 2: Table S1). Among these genes, many of them were sexual biased genes (Fig. 1). PBPs were widely thought to be sex pheromone binding function, normally insects have 3–5 PBP genes. Previous studies suggested that at least one PBP family isoform could well interact with the sex pheromones [32-34]. In our analysis, PBP2 showed significantly male biased expression, and PBP1, PBP3 and PBP4 showed significantly female biased expression. In male moth, the main assignment is to trail the sex pheromones to find a female moth for mating. We speculated the PBP2 might play a critical role in pheromone binding. Females are often selective in seeking a healthy counterpart for mating. GOBP1 and GOBP2 genes, as well as OBP6, OBP7 and OBP9, were also highly expressed in female, this may play some important roles and need for further study. GOBPs are proposed to detect host plants volatiles, food and oviposition sites and PBPs play a key role in detecting sex pheromones [35-37]. However, some studies have demonstrated that GOBPs can interact with sex pheromones and possibly responsible for conducting the function [38]. Our another study have showed that PBP2 and GOBP1 genes may play similar roles in detecting and transporting sex pheromones and host plant volatiles in C. pinicolalis [39]. There are also evolutionary evidence that GOBPs may evolved from PBP by gene duplication, PBP and GOBP2 in Manduca sexta show close relationship and play an important role in coordinated olfactory behaviors [40, 41]. Although the transcriptome of C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferlis possess higher similarity, the C. pinicolalis adult rely on fresh masson pine branches for laying eggs, which the case is very different in C. punctiferlis adult, they have a wide variety of host plants selection. Therefore, both GOBPs and PBPs from C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferlis might have a greater interest in future research. CSPs were found in insect contact and sensilla olfactory, but other members exhibited peculiar functions. In Apis mellifera, CSPs have been reported to be involved in larval growth and brood pheromone transportation [42, 43]. In a cockroach Blatta germanica, a CSP is involved in leg regeneration [44]. CSPs binding affinity towards volatile compounds was similar to that of OBPs [45]. In C. pinicolalis antennae transcriptome, we totally identified 19 putative CSPs, and found the transcript per kilobase million (TPM) values of five CSPs (CSP4, CSP5, CSP11, CSP14, and CSP17) were significantly higher in female antennae (Fig. 1b). MsepCSP8 of Mythimna separate was specially expressed in female antennae and showed less sensitive to plant volatiles after RNAi [46]. Also in Locusta migratoria, nearly 17 CSPs abundantly expressed in the female reproductive organs [47]. Higher numbers of CSPs in female antennae provide a valuable understanding that CSPs may play an important role in female moths, particularly when it comes to tracking the volatile cues from host-plants and oviposite. Totally there were 55 OR genes identified from male and female antennal transcriptome dataset, among them 22 ORs showed a significant difference in TPM ratio (Additional file 2: Table S1). In Lepidoptera, OR1 and OR3–8 were identified as pheromone receptors (PR). Our result obviously showed OR1, OR3 and OR6 were specially expressed in male antennae, this may suggest OR1, OR3 and OR6 genes focus on sex pheromones recognition. OR34 also performed biased expression in male antennae, but till now, the function is unknown. More numbers of ORs were highly expressed in female antennae (Fig. 2), this is also discovered in mosquitos [48]. In Bombyx mori, more female biased ORs suggested having function of oviposition cues or male-produced courtship pheromones [49]. This indicated more OR bias in female C. pinicolalis might provide more receptors for the detection of correct host plants and sex pheromones as well. IRs were proven for its multiple functions such as olfaction, chemosensory modalities, taste and response towards non-chemosensory factors like temperature sensing [50-53]. These IRs are highly sensitive to amines and acids [52]. We have identified 20 IRs in C. pinicolalis that is much more than the number of IRs reported in C. punctiferlis. Indeed, the number of IRs are different in many species. For example, some IRs were exclusively identified in Spodoptera littoralis and Helicoverpa armigera [54, 55]. Also, many IR genes were identified in gustatory organs in Drosophila melanogaster and the long-range attraction to polyamines is mediated by IR76b and IR41a [50, 56]. However, in this study the IR gene family from transcriptome data analyzed only from the C. pinicolalis antennae and compared with C. punctiferlis antennal dataset. Based on the transcriptome data analysis, we cannot conclude that there are only 20 (C. pinicolalis) and 11 (C. punctiferlis) [23] IR isoforms in C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferlis antenna. The identified IR isoforms in C. pinicolalis could help to study gene expansion/deletion and existence of other possible IR isoforms in the C. punctiferlis antenna and evolutionary relationship between these two species. NormFinder and geNorm programs are commonly used to screen and optimize the number of internal reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis [57, 58]. At the same time, the difference between reference genes can be compared, but only one optimal gene can be screened when using the NormFinder [59]. In this research, we used both methods to screen the reference gene. The GeNorm result showed Actin and GAPDH were more stable during different development stages of the C. pinicolalis, and NormFinder showed the RP49 as a stable reference gene. This variation may be due to different algorithms coded in this software. Different software were used for calculating the reference gene stability at different developmental stages in the yellow peach moth, RP49 and GAPDH were found to be more stable [60]. Since the expression of the reference gene differs for developmental stages and tissues, therefore the selection of two or more reference genes is useful to calibrate the expression level. Gao et al. [61] reported three different reference genes (Actin, RPL13 and peptidylprolyl isomerase) for different developmental stages in Aphidius gifuensis. Also, Actin, GAPDH and RP49 reported being the most stable reference gene in the Calliphoridae family [62]. According to our results, it is recommended to use GAPDH or RP49 at different developmental stages of the C. pinicolalis. On another hand, ribosomal proteins are involved in translation and protein synthesis, this recommended us to use RP49 and RPL13 for different tissues in yellow peach moth [60]. Similarly, our findings indicate that both RP49 and RPL13 are the best reference genes for the different body part of the adult. Furthermore, the female bias genes expression level of OBPs (PBP1, PBP3, PBP4, GOBP1, GOBP2, OBP6, OBP7 and OBP9) were verified by RT-qPCR and extremely consistent with the TMP values obtained from the transcriptome dataset. In addition, the fold change expression results of CSPs, ORs and IRs are consistent with the TMP values (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Therefore, we compared these olfactory-related gene expression levels of C. pinicolalis with C. punctiferalis, reported by Ge xing et al., 2016 [23]. Gene expression pattern reported from C. punctiferalis mostly differs from our study. Noteworthy, most of the ORs (OR2, OR3, OR5, OR6, OR13 and OR15) were significantly expressed in male antenna, whereas in C. punctiferalis the ORs were highly expressed in female antenna. At this point, we suggest these ORs might be functionally active in male moths when comparing with C. punctiferalis males. On the other hand, OBPs (OBP2, 5 and 6) and GOBPs (GOBP1 and 2) expression patterns were similar to that of C. punctiferalis. Exclusively, PBP (PBP1, 2, 3 and 4) genes expression was highly recorded in the C. punctiferalis male antenna [23]. In contrast, PBP1, 3 and 4 genes were significantly expressed in C. pinicolalis female antenna, only PBP3 had a similar expression pattern. However, most of the gene expression patterns of these olfactory-related proteins were different when compared with C. punctiferalis dataset [23], since C. pinicolalis is a monophagous pest that mainly feeds on Masson pines.

Conclusion

We mainly performed a comprehensive analysis of the antennal transcriptome of C. pinicolalis and mined many sexual bias expression olfactory related genes. Meanwhile, transcriptome data analysis revealed that most of the olfactory related genes had more than 90% identity with the C. punctiferlis. Noteworthy, 4 OBP, 5 OR, 2 IR and 2 CSP genes had 99% sequence similarity with its sibling species C. punctiferalis. This study provides a starting point to understand the genetic difference at the molecular level and further intensive studies are required to understand the evolutionary relationship between these two species.

Methods

Insects rearing and antennae collection

C. pinicolalis larvae were collected from the masson pine in Quanjiao County (32.07 N 117.54 E), Anhui Province, China. Fresh masson pine branch was used to feed the larvae under ambient conditions 27 ± 0.5 °C, with 70–75% relative humidity (RH) and a photo period of 16:8 h light: dark (L:D). After emergence, the moths were feed on 10% honey solution [63]. Three days old moths were selected from both sexes (20 moths/sex) and the antennae were excised for RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and first-strand cDNA synthesis

Total RNA from male and female antennae was isolated using the Quick-RNA™ MicroPrep Kit (ZYMO Research, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Ten pairs of antennae were excised from both the sexes. Three biological replicates were maintained (10 pairs/replication). The integrity of the total RNA was analyzed using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis [64]. The quality and concentration were analyzed on NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). The cDNA was synthesized by following the instructions from RT™ All-in-One Master Mix Kit (Herogen Biotech, USA). The first strand cDNA synthesis reaction was carried out from 1 μg of total RNA. Anchored oligo (dT) from the kit is used and cDNA was synthesized by following the manufacturer’s protocol. The final cDNA samples were stored at − 20 °C until further analysis.

Illumina sequencing

Transcriptome sequencing was performed at Novogen Co., Ltd. Beijing, China, and the RNA samples (including 3 biological replicates) were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform. The raw reads were curated by removing adaptor sequences and low quality reads, then assembled into unigenes using Trinity v2.4.0 [65, 66]. Reads with uncertain nucleotides larger than 10% of the fragment sequence were removed. Trinity de novo program with a default k-mer was used to assemble the clean reads. Sequences redundancy were minimized using CD-HIT program to obtain longest transcript contigs. Annotation-based metrics was adapted for the study. DESeq2 v1.6.3 was used to calculate the identified candidate genes differential expression levels (log2 fold change, P < 0.05) [67].

Unigenes annotation and classification

The unigenes were searched using BLASTX against the non-redundant (nr) NCBI protein database [68]. Using Blast2Go [69], we predicted and classified functions of unigenes by EuKaryotic of orthologous groups (KOG) database [70]. In addition, the online KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS) was employed for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis following the procedure pathway annotations for unigenes [71, 72].

Identification of olfactory genes and phylogenetic analyses

The candidate OBPs, ORs and IRs olfactory genes were analyzed using BLASTX, open reading frames (ORFs) were also identified. Phylogenetic tree based on amino acids of these genes was performed with MEGA7.0 software with the neighbour-joining (NJ) method by 1000 replication.

Analysis of differential gene expression

In order to investigate the expression bias in the antennae of both male and female of C. pinicolalis adults, we compared and reported the transcript abundance in units of TPM in both sexes. In the whole dataset of the transcriptome, we identified the interested candidate genes according to their FC, as assessed using corrected p-value (P) of < 0.05 (n = 3). Genes were considered as interesting bias expressed at a FC ≥ 2 and of potential interest if the genes exhibited 1.5 ≤ FC < 2, both with P < 0.05.

Reference genes selection in C. pinicolalis

To obtain the stably expressed gene as a reference gene for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) and provide a useful message in C. pinicolalis study, we selected β-actin gene (Actin), glyceraldehyde 3- GAPDH, RP49 and RPL13 as candidate reference genes based on reference genes in other insect species. The candidate reference gene expression pattern in different development stages (egg, larva, pupa and adult) and the different body part of the adult (antanna, head, throax, abdomen, leg and wings) of the C. pinicolalis were assessed by RT-qPCR. Ct values were evaluated by using the GeNorm and NormFinder method to identify the stable reference gene for specific tissues (Additional file 3: Table S2).

RT-qPCR analysis

The RT-qPCR analysis was performed on select genes to verify the fold changes expression explained in transcriptome data. The primers for RT-qPCR were designed using Primer 3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/primer3/) (Additional file 3: Table S3). The primers efficiency was tested by using 10-fold diluted cDNA samples and the standard curve was generated. The Ct values are plotted against the Log of the cDNA dilutions, efficiency percentage and R2 values are within the acceptable range [73]. Quantitative PCR was performed using SybrGreen qPCR Mastermix (DBI Bioscience, Germany), according to manufacturers’ protocol on ABI 7500 Fast (Applied Biosystems, USA) by using the following two-step program: denatured for 2 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles: 10 s at 95 °C; 30 s at 60 °C; melting curve analysis was performed from 60 °C to 95 °C to determine the specificity of PCR products. Three independent biological replicates were maintained for all the sample and four technical replicates were performed form each biological sample. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate relative fold change expression [74]. Fold change expression was analysed using t-test, software package SPSS v20.0. Additional file 1: Figure S1. A) functional annotation of assembled sequences based on gene ontology (GO) categorization; b) EuKaryotic of orthologous groups (KOG) classification; c) is KEGG pathway annotation of the transcriptome. Figure S2. Quantitative RT-qPCR expression levels of olfactory genes from female and male moth of C. pinicolalis. The expression levels were statistically significant (t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS: not significant). Figure S3. Phylogenetic relationship of olfactory-related gene from C. pinicolalis and other insects. A: ORs, B: IRs, C: CSPs. Red font represents the genes from C. pinicolalis; Cpun, Ofur, Bmor, Cmed, Ehip, Harm and Mcin are the abbreviation of C. punctiferalis, O. furnacalis, B. mori, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Eogystia hippophaecolus, Helicoverpa armigera, Macrocentrus cingulum, respectively. Additional file 2: Table S1. Candidate OBPs, CSPs, ORs and IRs genes in Conogethes pinicolalis antennae. Additional file 3: Table S2. Candidate reference genes in Conogethes pinicolalis antennae. Table S3. Primers for candidate genes by qRT-PCR.
  64 in total

Review 1.  Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication.

Authors:  P Pelosi; J-J Zhou; L P Ban; M Calvello
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Odor detection in insects: volatile codes.

Authors:  M de Bruyne; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Two subclasses of odorant-binding proteins in Spodoptera exigua display structural conservation and functional divergence.

Authors:  N-Y Liu; F Yang; K Yang; P He; X-H Niu; W Xu; A Anderson; S-L Dong
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.585

Review 4.  Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes.

Authors:  Walter S Leal
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Characterization of a chemosensory protein (ASP3c) from honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) as a brood pheromone carrier.

Authors:  Loïc Briand; Nicharat Swasdipan; Claude Nespoulous; Valérie Bézirard; Florence Blon; Jean-Claude Huet; Paul Ebert; Jean-Claude Penollet
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2002-09

6.  Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of the neotropical Satyrine Subtribe Euptychiina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae).

Authors:  Debra Murray; Dorothy Pashley Prowell
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 7.  Uncovering the complexity of transcriptomes with RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Valerio Costa; Claudia Angelini; Italia De Feis; Alfredo Ciccodicola
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-27

8.  Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Wendell L Roelofs; Alejandro P Rooney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Both Volatiles and Cuticular Plant Compounds Determine Oviposition of the Willow Sawfly Nematus oligospilus on Leaves of Salix spp. (Salicaceae).

Authors:  Celina L Braccini; Andrea S Vega; M Victoria Coll Aráoz; Peter E Teal; Teresa Cerrillo; Jorge A Zavala; Patricia C Fernandez
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Putative chemosensory receptors of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella, identified by antennal transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Jonas M Bengtsson; Federica Trona; Nicolas Montagné; Gianfranco Anfora; Rickard Ignell; Peter Witzgall; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Insights Into Chemosensory Proteins From Non-Model Insects: Advances and Perspectives in the Context of Pest Management.

Authors:  Paula Lizana; Ana Mutis; Andrés Quiroz; Herbert Venthur
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta) Chemosensory Proteins Are Expressed in Tissue, Developmental, and Caste-Specific Patterns.

Authors:  Arun Wanchoo; Wei Zhang; Almudena Ortiz-Urquiza; John Boswell; Yuxian Xia; Nemat O Keyhani
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 3.  Latest Developments in Insect Sex Pheromone Research and Its Application in Agricultural Pest Management.

Authors:  Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi; Justin George; Gadi V P Reddy; Xinnian Zeng; Angel Guerrero
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Olfactory Proteins and Their Expression Profiles in the Eucalyptus Pest Endoclita signifier Larvae.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhende Yang; Xiuhao Yang; Hongxuan Ma; Xiumei Liu; Ping Hu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Evaluation of Reference Genes in Glenea cantor (Fabricius) by Using qRT-PCR.

Authors:  Ran-Ran Su; Zhong-Yan Huang; Chao-Wei Qin; Xia-Lin Zheng; Wen Lu; Xiao-Yun Wang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.