Literature DB >> 32185488

The survival impact of postoperative complications after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score-matching analysis.

Manabu Yamamoto1,2, Mototsugu Shimokawa3, Daisuke Yoshida4, Shohei Yamaguchi4, Mitsuhiko Ohta4, Akinori Egashira4, Masahiko Ikebe4, Masaru Morita4, Yasushi Toh4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between postoperative complications and long-term survival after surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial.
METHOD: A total of 210 patients with ESCC who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with a reconstructed gastric tube were investigated according to the development of postoperative complications. The associations of age, gender, T and N factors, and pStage with grade 0-2 complications (NSC) and grade 3 and higher complications (SC) were compared by propensity score-matching analysis. Fifty-one pairs of NSC and SC groups were selected for the final analysis. We divided 102 patients between the NSC and SC groups or between the no pulmonary complication (NPC) and the pulmonary complication (PC) groups. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by log-rank tests. Possible predictors of OS and DFS were subjected to univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
RESULTS: The propensity score matching revealed that the 5-year OS and DFS of the NSC group were not different from those of the SC group. However, the 5-year OS of the PC group was significantly worse than that of the NPC group, while no significant differences were observed in the DFS between the PC and NPC groups. In the multivariate analysis, UICC pStage, pulmonary complication, and American Heart Association (AHA) classification for OS and UICC pStage for DFS were significant prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: The OS and DFS did not differ in patients with or without severe postoperative complications. However, postoperative pulmonary complications were independent predictors of poorer OS, but not DFS, in patients who underwent R0 resection for ESCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Postoperative complications; Propensity matching; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32185488     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03173-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  32 in total

Review 1.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer.

Authors:  Fanyu Meng; Yin Li; Haibo Ma; Ming Yan; Ruixiang Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Major perioperative morbidity does not affect long-term survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Brent T Xia; Ernest L Rosato; Karen A Chojnacki; Albert G Crawford; Benny Weksler; Adam C Berger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  R C Karl; R Schreiber; D Boulware; S Baker; D Coppola
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Peter-Martin Krarup; Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen; Lars N Jorgensen; Henrik Harling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The influence of technical complications on postoperative outcome and survival after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lorenzo E Ferri; Simon Law; Kam-Ho Wong; Ka-Fai Kwok; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Inflammatory oncotaxis.

Authors:  R P DerHagopian; E V Sugarbaker; A Ketcham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of JCOG9907.

Authors:  Kozo Kataoka; Hiroya Takeuchi; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroyasu Igaki; Soji Ozawa; Tetsuya Abe; Kenichi Nakamura; Ken Kato; Nobutoshi Ando; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Peter B Bach; Deborah Schrag; Manjit S Bains; Alan D Turnbull; Martin Karpeh; Murray F Brennan; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Development and validation of a prognostic model based on SEER data for patients with esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy].

Authors:  C Luo; G Wang; L Hu; Y Qiang; C Zheng; Y Shen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Association of anastomotic leakage with long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Satoru Matsuda; Shuhei Mayanagi; Tomoyuki Irino; Jun Okui; Kazumasa Fukuda; Rieko Nakamura; Norihito Wada; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.