Literature DB >> 10767784

Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy.

R C Karl1, R Schreiber, D Boulware, S Baker, D Coppola.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety of transthoracic esophagogastrectomy (TTE) in a multidisciplinary cancer center and to determine which clinical parameters influenced survival and the rates of death and complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the incidence of cancer at the gastroesophageal junction has been rising rapidly in the United States, controversy still exists about the safety of surgical procedures designed to remove the distal esophagus and proximal stomach. Alternatives to TTE have been proposed because of the reportedly high rates of death and complications associated with the procedure.
METHODS: Data from 143 patients treated by TTE by one author (1989-1999) were entered into a computerized database. Preoperative clinical parameters were tested for effect on death, complications, and survival.
RESULTS: The patient population consisted of 127 men and 16 women. One hundred twenty-one patients had a history of tobacco abuse, and 118 reported the regular ingestion of alcohol. One hundred fifteen patients had adenocarcinoma, 16 had squamous cell cancer, 6 had another form of esophageal tumor, and 6 had high-grade dysplasia associated with Barrett epithelia. Fifty-six patients had adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett epithelium. Twenty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation before surgery. Three patients died within 30 days of surgery (mortality rate 2.1%). Five patients (3.5%) had a documented anastomotic leak; three died). Overall, 42 patients had complications (29%). Twenty-six had pulmonary complications (19%). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 3.35 days; the mean hospital length of stay was 13.54 days. The overall 3-year survival rate was 29.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: A high ASA score and the development of complications predicted an increased length of stay. The presence of diabetes predicted the development of complication and an increased length of stay. None of the other parameters tested predicted perioperative death or complications. Only disease stage, diabetes, and blood transfusion affected overall survival. From these results with a large series of patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers, TTE can be performed with a low death rate (2.1%), a low leak rate (3. 5%), and an acceptable complication rate (29%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10767784      PMCID: PMC1421050          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance.

Authors:  G H FREEMAN; J H HALTON
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Effect of blood transfusion on survival after esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  S R Craig; D J Adam; P L Yap; H A Leaver; R A Elton; E W Cameron; C T Sang; W S Walker
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  J F Bosset; M Gignoux; J P Triboulet; E Tiret; G Mantion; D Elias; P Lozach; J C Ollier; J J Pavy; M Mercier; T Sahmoud
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Operable esophageal cancer: current results from the West.

Authors:  A Watson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria.

Authors:  F H Ellis; G J Heatley; M J Krasna; W A Williamson; K Balogh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Delayed leaks and fistulas after esophagogastrectomy: radiologic evaluation.

Authors:  M M Anbari; M S Levine; R B Cohen; S E Rubesin; I Laufer; E F Rosato
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Tobacco, alcohol intake, and diet in relation to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.

Authors:  G C Kabat; S K Ng; E L Wynder
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Transfusion does not influence patient survival after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Molland; O F Dent; P H Chapuis; E L Bokey; M Nicholls; R C Newland
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1995-08
View more
  79 in total

Review 1.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Shinji Hattori; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Dan Comay; Gord Blackhouse; Ron Goeree; David Armstrong; John K Marshall
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Vasile V Bintintan; Jörg Köninger; Beat P Müller-Stich; Michael Reiter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Risk prediction scores for postoperative mortality after esophagectomy: validation of different models.

Authors:  U Zingg; C Langton; B Addison; B P L Wijnhoven; J Forberger; S K Thompson; A J Esterman; D I Watson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  A Karliczek; N J Harlaar; C J Zeebregts; T Wiggers; P C Baas; G M van Dam
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Esophagectomy--it's not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Sonia Kunz; Drew Schembre; Henry Otero; Tom Malpass; Alex Hsi; Guobin Song; Richard Hinke; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Endoscopic techniques in the management of esophagojejunal dehiscence after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Komdej Thanavachirasin; Eric Marcotte; Pornthep Prathanvanich; Bipan Chand
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2017-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.