| Literature DB >> 32184765 |
Xian Liu1, Yuzhe Wang1, Yuhui Liu2, Hui Chen2, Yalin Hu1.
Abstract
Successive rotation and monoculture, as common silvicultural practices, are extensively applied worldwide, particularly in subtropn>ical Chinese fir (Entities:
Keywords: Chinese fir plantation; Ion S5TM XL sequencing platform; bacterial community; fungal community; successive plantation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32184765 PMCID: PMC7058989 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Soil physical and chemical characteristics in different generations of Chinese fir plantation (December and June) at the Xinkou Forest Farm, Fujian, China.
| December | NF | 4.30 ± 0.02a | 17.06 ± 0.65c | 15.83 ± 1.59b | 1.13 ± 0.15b | 14.20 ± 0.77a | 30.69 ± 5.05a | 0.76 ± 0.13b | 122.32 ± 10.41b |
| FRP | 4.00 ± 0.03c | 21.43 ± 0.45b | 22.45 ± 2.18a | 1.54 ± 0.09a | 14.47 ± 0.57a | 5.81 ± 0.28b | 4.96 ± 1.00a | 215.99 ± 39.70a | |
| SRP | 4.19 ± 0.03b | 27.46 ± 1.23a | 25.58 ± 1.79a | 1.77 ± 0.04a | 14.43 ± 0.76a | 6.38 ± 0.68b | 4.57 ± 0.48a | 221.06 ± 9.11a | |
| TRP | 4.07 ± 0.03c | 20.51 ± 1.13b | 27.15 ± 1.66a | 1.75 ± 0.12a | 15.53 ± 0.24a | 7.97 ± 1.00b | 4.81 ± 0.44a | 159.23 ± 8.57ab | |
| June | NF | 4.42 ± 0.05a | 28.41 ± 1.62b | 28.60 ± 2.25a | 1.81 ± 0.07ab | 15.71 ± 0.65a | 6.64 ± 1.47a | 8.61 ± 1.39b | 88.29 ± 3.55b |
| FRP | 4.23 ± 0.02c | 29.05 ± 0.28ab | 21.72 ± 0.91b | 1.54 ± 0.04b | 14.12 ± 0.27b | 5.69 ± 2.59a | 13.48 ± 1.00a | 134.34 ± 6.27a | |
| SRP | 4.26 ± 0.03b | 32.78 ± 2.04a | 26.00 ± 1.79ab | 1.78 ± 0.09ab | 14.56 ± 0.48ab | 7.40 ± 0.18a | 2.97 ± 0.57c | 89.22 ± 7.30b | |
| TRP | 4.14 ± 0.04c | 31.06 ± 0.64ab | 29.82 ± 2.22a | 1.88 ± 0.15a | 15.95 ± 0.49a | 3.16 ± 0.35a | 10.57 ± 0.48b | 117.60 ± 6.99a | |
| December | NF | 11.77 ± 1.11a | 10.53 ± 0.96c | 272.66 ± 19.99ab | 39.28 ± 1.98a | 6.95 ± 0.37a | 5.20 ± 0.17b | ||
| FRP | 14.44 ± 1.38a | 14.84 ± 1.74ab | 257.63 ± 53.90c | 36.19 ± 9.56a | 7.38 ± 0.75a | 5.77 ± 0.16a | |||
| SRP | 14.97 ± 0.96a | 14.93 ± 1.08bc | 307.37 ± 20.45bc | 41.95 ± 0.55a | 7.33 ± 0.49a | 5.12 ± 0.16b | |||
| TRP | 12.03 ± 1.52a | 14.01 ± 2.29bc | 207.81 ± 16.83bc | 27.03 ± 6.59a | 8.57 ± 1.33a | 5.28 ± 0.17b | |||
| June | NF | 21.68 ± 0.79a | 4.07 ± 0.07c | 497.30 ± 24.25ab | 95.31 ± 5.87a | 5.23 ± 0.11a | 2.44 ± 0.11b | ||
| FRP | 23.07 ± 0.65a | 5.81 ± 0.14ab | 281.77 ± 28.73c | 45.64 ± 6.19b | 6.33 ± 0.60a | 2.72 ± 0.07a | |||
| SRP | 20.90 ± 1.58a | 4.28 ± 0.22bc | 403.42 ± 75.95bc | 69.17 ± 8.90ab | 5.75 ± 0.42a | 2.59 ± 0.15b | |||
| TRP | 24.34 ± 1.99a | 4.93 ± 0.52bc | 412.58 ± 60.44bc | 69.74 ± 13.81ab | 6.28 ± 0.75a | 2.48 ± 0.08b | |||
Soil bacterial alpha diversity indices in different generations of Chinese fir plantation (December and June) at the Xinkou Forest Farm, Fujian, China.
| December | NF | 1363 ± 29a | 1592 ± 56a | 1579 ± 59a | 8.15 ± 0.06a |
| FRP | 1350 ± 61a | 1583 ± 100a | 1575 ± 95a | 8.08 ± 0.02a | |
| SRP | 1384 ± 76a | 1647 ± 129a | 1662 ± 130a | 8.08 ± 0.07a | |
| TRP | 1193 ± 51b | 1346 ± 82b | 1315 ± 88b | 7.50 ± 0.24b | |
| June | NF | 1258 ± 37a | 1398 ± 39a | 1393 ± 39a | 8.01 ± 0.08a |
| FRP | 1299 ± 41a | 1404 ± 45a | 1399 ± 52a | 8.15 ± 0.08a | |
| SRP | 1313 ± 20a | 1423 ± 26a | 1409 ± 18a | 8.11 ± 0.06a | |
| TRP | 1240 ± 15b | 1345 ± 19b | 1332 ± 19b | 8.07 ± 0.04b | |
Soil fungal alpha diversity indices in December and June at the Xinkou Forest Farm, Fujian, China.
| December | NF | 1325 ± 42b | 1486 ± 41ab | 1469 ± 43a | 6.63 ± 0.20b |
| FRP | 1357 ± 107ab | 1500 ± 107ab | 1496 ± 108a | 7.03 ± 0.37ab | |
| SRP | 1430 ± 38a | 1556 ± 42a | 1547 ± 39a | 7.59 ± 0.14a | |
| TRP | 1171 ± 27b | 1306 ± 19b | 1297 ± 19a | 6.30 ± 0.42b | |
| June | NF | 1189 ± 32b | 1393 ± 23ab | 1361 ± 27a | 6.04 ± 0.34b |
| FRP | 1335 ± 79ab | 1503 ± 69ab | 1489 ± 70a | 6.95 ± 0.44ab | |
| SRP | 1386 ± 59a | 1629 ± 167a | 1953 ± 516a | 7.22 ± 0.15a | |
| TRP | 1315 ± 48b | 1475 ± 33b | 1451 ± 32a | 6.65 ± 0.30b | |
FIGURE 1Relative abundance of the most abundant fungal (A) and bacterial (B) groups in different plantations in June at the phyla level. Others represented unclassified groups. Data are means ± standard error (n = 4). Significant differences are indicated with distinct letters. NF, natural forest; FRP, first rotation plantation; SRP, second rotation plantation; TRP, third rotation plantation.
FIGURE 2Relative abundance of the most abundant fungal (A) and bacterial (B) groups in different plantations in June at the genus level. Others represented unclassified groups. Data are means ± standard error (n = 4). Significant differences are indicated with distinct letters. NF, natural forest; FRP, first rotation plantation; SRP, second rotation plantation; TRP, third rotation plantation.
FIGURE 3Non-metric multidimensional (NMDS) scaling plot of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) community structure across all soil samples in different plantations and sampling times (using combined December and June data). Stress value is indicated in the figure. Data points are from different plantations and sampling seasons (NF, natural forest; FRP, first rotation plantation; SRP, second rotation plantation; TRP, third rotation plantation; Dec, December; Jun, June).
FIGURE 4Redundancy analysis (RDA) illustrating the effects of environmental factors (arrows) on fungal (A) and bacterial (B) community structure (symbols) across all soil samples in different plantations and sampling times (using combined December and June data). The values of axes 1 and 2 are the percentage that can be explained by the corresponding axis. Data points are from different plantations and sampling seasons (NF, natural forest; FRP, first rotation plantation; SRP, second rotation plantation; TRP, third rotation plantation; Dec, December; Jun, June).