| Literature DB >> 32183118 |
Franziska Wemheuer1, Dirk Berkelmann2, Bernd Wemheuer2, Rolf Daniel2, Stefan Vidal1, Hervé Bertin Bisseleua Daghela1,3.
Abstract
Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) is one of the most economically important crops worldwide. Despite the important role of endophytes for plant growth and health, very little is known about the effect of agroforestry management systems on the endophyte communities of T. cacao. To close this knowledge gap, we investigated the diversity, community composition, and function of bacterial and fungal endophytes in the leaves of T. cacao trees growing in five major cacao-growing regions in the central region of Cameroon using DNA metabarcoding. Fungal but not bacterial alpha diversity measures differed significantly between the agroforestry management systems. Interestingly, less managed home-garden cacao forests harbored the lowest fungal richness and diversity. Our results suggest that the composition of bacterial and fungal endophyte communities is predominantly affected by agroforestry management systems and, to a lesser extent, by environmental properties. The core microbiome detected comprised important fungal phytopathogens, such as Lasiodiplodia species. Several predicted pathways of bacterial endophytes and functional guilds of fungal endophytes differed between the agroforest systems which might be attributed to bacteria and fungi specifically associated with a single agroforest. Our results provide the basis for future studies on foliar fungal and bacterial endophytes of T. cacao and their responsiveness towards agroforestry management systems.Entities:
Keywords: Theobroma cacao; agroforestry management systems; core microbiome; endophytes; functional predictions; metabarcoding; microbial diversity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32183118 PMCID: PMC7143032 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8030405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Landscape characteristics of the five regions Boumnyébel (sites Pan Makak, Simanya), Talba, Bakoa, Kédia and Obala (sites Ekabita Essélé, Nkolobang). See Supplementary Table S1 for further details.
| Region | Plantation | Trees | Agroforestry Management | Agricultural Land | Forest Land |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boumnyébel | Pan Makak 1 | 4 | extensively managed old (cocoa is grown under a dense cover of shade tree species) | 20% cocoa fields, 10% annual crop | 70% pristine forest, with forest reserve |
| Pan Makak 2 | 4 | ||||
| Simanya 1 | 4 | ||||
| Simanya 2 | 4 | ||||
| Talba | Talba 1 | 4 | intensively managed manure (cocoa is grown in larger farms) | 70% cocoa fields, 5% annual field crops | 25% pristine forest, no reserve |
| Talba 2 | 4 | ||||
| Talba 3 | 4 | ||||
| Talba 4 | 4 | ||||
| Bakoa | Bakoa 1 | 2 | extensively managed young (cocoa is grown on modified savannah agroecosystems) | 50% cocoa fields, 25% annual field crops, 5% patchy pasture fields | 20% secondary forest, no reserve |
| Bakoa 2 | 2 | ||||
| Bakoa 3 | 2 | ||||
| Bakoa 4 | 2 | ||||
| Kédia | Kédia 1 | 2 | intensively managed young (cocoa is grown under full sun) | 65% cocoa fields, 25% annual field crops, 5% pasture lands | 5% secondary forest |
| Kédia 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kédia 3 | 2 | ||||
| Kédia 4 | 2 | ||||
| Obala | Ekabita Essélé 1 | 4 | home garden cacao forest (cocoa is grown nearby houses with a high variety of fruit tree species) | 70% cocoa fields, 25% annual crop fields of mixed crops, agroforestry trees | 5% secondary forest, no forest reserve |
| Ekabita Essélé 2 | 4 | ||||
| Nkolobang 1 | 4 | ||||
| Nkolobang 2 | 4 |
Figure 1Biplot of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on Euclidean distances. Comparison of the seven sampling sites in Cameroon by environmental characteristics and agroforestry management. The first two principal components (PC) explained 60.8% of total variation in the data. For further explanation on environmental data, see Supplementary Table S1.
Figure 2Abundant fungal (A) and bacterial (B) orders in T. cacao leaves collected in seven different agroforestry management systems in Cameroon. Only orders with an average abundance ≥1% (bacteria) or ≥0.5% (fungi) in the entire data set are shown.
Figure 3Abundant fungal (A) and bacterial (B) genera in T. cacao leaves collected in seven different agroforestry management systems in Cameroon. Only genera with an average abundance ≥1% in the entire data set are shown.
Figure 4Distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) plot showing the relationship of environmental properties and agroforestry management system to foliar fungal (A) and bacterial (B) endophyte communities of T. cacao. Ordination is based on weighted Bray-Curtis distances between samples and is color-coded by sampling region. Factors were chosen that significantly (p ≤0.05) contributed to the model. Axes labelled with an asterisk are significant. The first axes explained 42.5% (bacteria) or 42.2% (fungi), whereas the second axes explained 28.1% (bacteria) or 22.6% (fungi).
Results of the db-RDA that describes the effect of environmental properties and agroforestry management systems on endophyte community composition in T. cacao leaves.
| DF | SumOfSqs | F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | |||||
| Entire Model | 6 | 3.89 | 2.30 | 0.001 | *** |
| Cocoa Tree Density | 1 | 0.49 | 1.72 | 0.024 | * |
| Altitude | 1 | 0.70 | 2.47 | 0.002 | ** |
| Fungicides rate/Cropping Season | 1 | 0.51 | 1.82 | 0.022 | * |
| Fungicides | 1 | 0.70 | 2.49 | 0.002 | ** |
| Shade Tree Height | 1 | 0.56 | 1.97 | 0.013 | * |
| Insecticides rate/Cropping Season | 1 | 0.45 | 1.58 | 0.049 | * |
| Residual | 57 | 16.08 | |||
| Fungi | |||||
| Entire Model | 5 | 4.33 | 2.31 | 0.001 | *** |
| Humidity | 1 | 1.05 | 2.78 | 0.001 | *** |
| Shade Tree Height | 1 | 0.70 | 1.87 | 0.006 | ** |
| Fungicides rate/Cropping Season | 1 | 0.71 | 1.90 | 0.005 | ** |
| Fungicides | 1 | 0.58 | 1.54 | 0.019 | * |
| Insecticides rate/Cropping Season | 1 | 0.55 | 1.48 | 0.042 | * |
| Residual | 58 | 21.77 | |||
For each model, forward selection was applied to identify which factors best described variation in community composition using an inclusion threshold of α = 0.05 and Bray-Curtis distances. Marginal effects of terms are shown (i.e., terms were not added sequentially). The number of unrestricted permutations: 999. Significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. SumOfSps: sum of squares, DF: degrees of freedom.
Alpha diversity measures (mean ± standard deviation) for bacterial and fungal endophytes in leaves of T. cacao. Richness and diversity are represented by the number of observed zero-radius operational taxonomic units (zOTUs) and Shannon diversity index H’, respectively.
| Fungi | Bacteria | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | Diversity | Richness | Diversity | |
| Obala | 178 ± 76A | 3.04 ± 0.98A | 1729 ± 218 | 7.02 ± 0.31 |
| - Ekabita Essélé | 174 ± 72a | 2.85 ± 0.98a | 1672 ± 255 | 6.92 ± 0.4 |
| - Nkolobang | 182 ± 85a | 3.24 ± 0.99 | 1785 ± 172 | 7.11 ± 0.18 |
| Boumnyébel | 279 ± 106B | 4.09 ± 1.31B | 1820 ± 85 | 7.17 ± 0.1 |
| - Pan Makak | 250 ± 110b | 3.96 ± 1.47 | 1814 ± 88 | 7.16 ± 0.09 |
| - Simanya | 307 ± 101b | 4.22 ± 1.23 | 1826 ± 87 | 7.19 ± 0.1 |
| Bakoa | 231 ± 82AB | 3.48 ± 1.11AB | 1789 ± 160 | 7.15 ± 0.19 |
| Talba | 292 ± 55Bb | 4.44 ± 0.41Bb | 1804 ± 137 | 7.17 ± 0.13 |
| Kédia | 330 ± 87Bb | 4.42 ± 0.64B | 1782 ± 101 | 7.12 ± 0.11 |
A,B Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the five regions (Obala, Boumnyébel, Bakoa, Talba and Kédia). Note that fungal diversity differed marginally (p ≤ 0.1) among Bakoa and Talba/Boumnyébel. In addition, fungal richness differed marginally between Bakoa and Kédia. a,b Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the seven sites (Ekabita Essélé, Nkolobang, Pan Makak, Simanya, Bakoa, Talba and Kédia). Note that there were marginally significant differences in fungal diversity between Ekabita Essélé and Pan Makak/Simanya/Kédia, and between Nkolobang and Talba.
Correlation between alpha diversity measures and environmental properties/an agroforestry management system based on Spearman’s rank correlation. Richness and diversity are represented by the number of observed zOTUs and Shannon diversity index H’, respectively.
| Tested Variable | Fungal Endophytes | Bacterial Endophytes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | Diversity | Richness | Diversity | ||||||
| Environmental properties | DF | rho | p | rho | p | rho | p | rho | p |
| Altitude | 62 | −0.11 | 0.37 | −0.10 | 0.43 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.56 |
| Temperature | 62 | 0.34 | 0.006 | 0.26 | 0.04 | −0.06 | 0.65 | −0.01 | 0.92 |
| Humidity | 62 | −0.34 | 0.006 | −0.26 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.87 | −0.11 | 0.41 |
| Rainfall | 62 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.24 |
| 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.04 | 0.73 |
| Agroforestry management | |||||||||
| Age | 62 | −0.22 |
| −0.11 | 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.87 |
| Cacao Tree Density | 62 | −0.26 | 0.04 | −0.21 |
| −0.09 | 0.46 | −0.18 | 0.16 |
| Insecticides rate * | 62 | −0.06 | 0.62 | −0.05 | 0.70 | −0.08 | 0.51 | −0.09 | 0.49 |
| Fungicides rate * | 62 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.42 | <0.001 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Shade Tree Height | 62 | −0.14 | 0.26 | 0.004 | 0.97 | −0.18 | 0.16 | −0.17 | 0.18 |
| Shade Tree Diversity | 62 | −0.07 | 0.57 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.48 |
| Shade Cover | 62 | −0.18 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.86 | 0.02 | 0.88 |
| Tree Height | 62 | −0.27 | 0.03 | −0.29 | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.83 | −0.02 | 0.85 |
Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) and marginally significant (p ≤ 0.1) p values are written in bold and are underlined, respectively. DF: degrees of freedom. * Fungicides and Insecticides rate/Cropping Season.
Figure 5Bipartite association network of fungal (A) and bacterial (B) zOTUs in T. cacao leaves significantly associated with site. The sites are color-coded as in Figure 1. Bacterial phyla and fungal orders, which were predominant in the dataset and/or in one site, are highlighted.
Figure 6Functional guilds of fungal endophytes in T. cacao leaves. The relative abundance of fungal sequences (sequence richness) per guild (A) and the proportion of zOTUs (zOTU richness) per guild (B) is shown for the seven sites. The analyses are based on 31.5% of the zOTUs (n = 1766 zOTUs). The sequence richness and zOTU richness were calculated by the number of sequences assigned to a specific guild divided by the number of all assigned sequences and by the number of zOTUs assigned to a specific guild per sample divided by the number of zOTUs per sample, respectively. Following the suggestion of Nguyen et al. [48], we combined both dimensions (sequence and zOTU richness) to better reflect the relative importance of fungal life strategies in an environment. Only guilds with an average abundance ≥0.5% in the entire data set are shown.
Figure 7Predicted functional profiles of bacterial endophytes in T. cacao leaves. The color code refers to the relative abundance of each pathway, with high predicted abundances (dark-colored) and low predicted abundances (light-colored). The relative abundances of pathways were calculated for each site. Only pathways with an average abundance ≥1% in the entire data set are shown.