| Literature DB >> 32182880 |
Li Hao1, Li Xue2, Fengchun Huang2, Gaozhe Cai2, Wuzhen Qi1, Miao Zhang2, Qing'an Han3, Zengli Wang3, Jianhan Lin1,2.
Abstract
Screening of foodborne pathogens is an effective way to prevent microbial food poisoning. A microfluidic biosensor was developed for rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella Typhimurium using quantum dots (QDs) as fluorescent probes for sensor readout and manganese dioxide nanoflowers (MnO2 NFs) and as QDs nanocarriers for signal amplification. Prior to testing, amino-modified MnO2 nanoflowers (MnO2-NH2 NFs) were conjugated with carboxyl-modified QDs through EDC/NHSS method to form MnO2-QD NFs, and MnO2-QD NFs were functionalized with polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) to form MnO2-QD-pAb NFs. First, the mixture of target Salmonella Typhimurium cells and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) modified with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was injected with MnO2-QD-pAb NFs into a microfluidic chip to form MNP-bacteria-QD-MnO2 complexes. Then, glutathione (GSH) was injected to dissolve MnO2 on the complexes into Mn2+, resulting in the release of QDs. Finally, fluorescent intensity of the released QDs was measured using the fluorescent detector to determine the amount of Salmonella. A linear relationship between fluorescent intensity and bacterial concentration from 1.0 × 102 to 1.0 × 107 CFU/mL was found with a low detection limit of 43 CFU/mL and mean recovery of 99.7% for Salmonella in spiked chicken meats, indicating the feasibility of this biosensor for practical applications.Entities:
Keywords: Microfluidic biosensor; SalmonellaTyphimurium; magnetic nanoparticles; manganese dioxide nanoflowers; quantum dots
Year: 2020 PMID: 32182880 PMCID: PMC7143389 DOI: 10.3390/mi11030281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Scheme 1(a) The schematic of the microfluidic chip; (b) The principle of the fluorescent biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella Typhimurium.
Figure 1(a) The simulation on mixing efficiency of the mixing channel; (b) The mixing of two inks in the microfluidic chip.
Figure 2(a) The TEM image of the MnO2 NFs; (b) The TEM image of the MnO2-QD NFs. The inset is the TEM image of the QDs; (c) The fluorescent spectra of the QDs, MnO2 NFs, MnO2-QD NFs, and the mixture of the MnO2-QD NFs and GSH.
Figure 3(a) The distribution of the magnetic field; (b) The strength of the magnetic field in the separation chamber at the vertical direction; (c) The strength of the magnetic field in the separation chamber at the horizontal direction; (d) The strength of the magnetic field from the separation chamber to the incubation channel.
Figure 4(a) The spectra of the MNP-bacteria-MnO2-QD complexes at different concentrations from 1.0 × 102 CFU/mL to 1.0 × 107 CFU/mL; (b) The linear relationship between the fluorescent intensity and the bacterial concentration; (c) The TEM image of the MNP-bacteria-MnO2-QD complexes.
Figure 5(a) Detection of chicken samples spiked with Salmonella Typhimurium (N = 3); (b) Detection of L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7, S. aureus, B. cereus, and S. Typhimurium at the same concentration of 105 CFU/mL, and the negative control (N = 3).