| Literature DB >> 33718778 |
Sultan Şahin1,2,3, Caner Ünlü1,2,4, Levent Trabzon1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) are synthetic semiconductor nanocrystals with unique optical and electronic properties due to their size (2-10 nm) such as high molar absorption coefficient (10-100 times higher than organic dyes), resistance to chemical degradation, and unique optoelectronic properties due to quantum confinement (high quantum yield, emission color change with size). Compared to organic fluorophores, the narrower emission band and wider absorption bands of QDs offer great advantages in cell imaging and biosensor applications. The optoelectronic features of QDs have prompted their intensive use in bioanalytical, biophysical, and biomedical research. As the nanomaterials have been integrated into microfluidic systems, microfluidic technology has accelerated the adaptation of nanomaterials to clinical evaluation together with the advantages such as being more economical, more reproducible, and more susceptible to modification and integration with other technologies. Microfluidic systems serve an important role by being a platform in which QDs are integrated for biosensing applications. As we combine the advantages of QDs and microfluidic technology for biosensing technology, QD-based biosensor integrated with microfluidic systems can be used as an advanced and versatile diagnostic technology in case of pandemic. Specifically, there is an urgent necessity to have reliable and fast detection systems for COVID-19 virus. In this review, affinity-based biosensing mechanisms which are developed with QDs are examined in the domain of microfluidic approach. The combination of microfluidic technology and QD-based affinity biosensors are presented with examples in order to develop a better technological framework of diagnostic for COVID-19 virus. © Qatar University and Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Biosensors; Microfluidic systems; Quantum dots
Year: 2021 PMID: 33718778 PMCID: PMC7944724 DOI: 10.1007/s42247-021-00195-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emergent Mater ISSN: 2522-5731
Affinity biosensors by quantum dots in microfluidic systems
| Binding chemistry, bioelement immobilization, deposition | Quantum dots | Target | Fluid flow driven Flow rate | Microchannel dimensions/material | Output | YearRef |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical affinity biosensors by quantum dots in microfluidic systems | ||||||
| QD-anti human IgG: commercial | Anti-human IgG-conjugated CdSe/ZnS QD565 | Anti-human IgG | Syringe pump | Microwell: 50 μm × 50 μm ×30 μm | •Polystrene microbead-based optical immunoassay •Multifunctional microwell plate capturing of bio-materials into multiple microwells, well isolation, and the introduction of specific chemicals •A single microbead captured and isolated inside a designated microchamber in a small volume of 75 pL •LOD: 0.1 μg/mL | 2006 [ |
| QD-antigen:carbodiimide chemistry (EDC/NHS coupling) | CdSe/ZnS QD570 and 615 | HBsAg, NSP4, and gp41 | Electrokinetically | 100 μm wide 15 μm high (PDMS) | •Multiplex detection by QD barcodes •50-fold improvement in sensitivity compared ELISA kits for anti-HBsAg and anti-gp41(10−10−10−12 M) | 2007 [ |
| QD-antibodies (IgG): SMCC/DTT | CdSe/ZnS QD565 and 655 | CEA, CA125, and Her-2/Neu (CerbB-2) | Peristaltic pump 0.2–1.1 mL/min | (PMMA) | •Multiplex detection •Response time: 27 min •Linear detection range: 0–100 ng/mL CEA, 0–60 ng/mL Her-2/Neu, and 0–400 U/mL CA125 •1.9 times more sensitive than ELISA test •LODs: 0.02 ng/mL CEA, 0.27 ng/mL Her-2/Neu •Selective and reproducible •Real sample analysis is successful | 2009 [ |
QD-IgG:carbodiimide chemistry (EDC/NHS coupling) Immobilization:van der Waals interactions between antibody and PDMS, blocking reagent is BSA | CdTe/CdS QD530, 564, and 595 | CEA and AFP | Syringe pump | 150 μm wide 30 μm high (PDMS) | •Multiplex detection •High brightness than Cy3-IgG •Detection linear range: 25 fM to 25 nM •LOD of CEA and AFP is 250 fM | 2010 [ |
| QD-streptavidin-oligonucleotides | QD565 streptavidin conjugate | Oligonucleotides for B, C, D, E genotypes of HBV DNA | Syringe pump | Microwell: 150 μm × 200 μm × 30 μm (w-l-d) Microchannel: 500 μm × 2 mm × 10 μm (w-l-d) (PDMS) | •Multiplex detection for 4 different genotypes of HBV •1 × 103 copies/mL of HBV virus could detected and identified its genotypes •LOD: 4 pM •Reaction time: <30 min | 2010 [ |
| QD-oligonucleotide | CdSe/ZnS QD524 | Oligonucleotide | Electrokinetically | 250 μm wide 9 μm depth (PDMS) | •FRET based optical detection in microfluidic channel •Sample volume:1 μL •Detection time: 5 min | 2011 [ |
| QD-BSA-2,4-D: EDC/Sulfo NHS chemistry | Carboxyl coated CdSe/ZnSe QD605 | 2,4-D | Syringe pump | 600 μm × 100 μm (glass) | •High-efficiency FRET and high sensitivity •Linear detection range: 0.5 μM to 30 μM •LOD: 0.5 nM S/N: 3 •Response time: 6 min | 2012 [ |
| QD-streptavidin: commercial | Streptavidin-conjugated CdSe/ZnS QD605 | Adenosine and cocaine | NA | 100 μm × 100 μm × 30 μm (w × l × d)-microchamber 150 μm × 1500 μm × 10 μm (w × l × d)-microchamber (PDMS) | •Multiplex detection by bead based array •Linear detection range for adenosine: 0.5–50pM for cocaine: 1–100pM •Based on the dual signal amplification strategy •LODs: 0.1pM and 0.5 pM for adenosine and cocaine •Sample volume: 10 μL | 2014 [ |
| QD-anti-Salmonella antibodies: SMCC/DTT | CdSe/ZnS QD605 | Peristaltic pump 40 μL/min | 400 μm width 50 μm height (PDMS) | • •Linear detection range: 0–106 CFU/mL in real (R2= 0.949) and artificial (R2=0.995) samples •LOD: 103 CFU/mL •Selective for Salmonella bacteria | 2015 [ | |
| MSN/QD-aptamer: MSN-CTAB-APTES/QD-EDC- NHS/DNA Aptamer | CdTe QD553–566 | MCF-7, HL-60, and K562 cells | Capillary action | Paper based microchannels | •Multiplex detection •Paper-based analytical device was developed (Cheap and easy usable) •Linear detection range: 180 to 8 × 107, 210 to 7 × 107, 200 to 7 × 107cells /mL for MCF-7, HL-60, and K562 cells, respectively •LODs: 62, 70 and 65 cells/mL •Highly selective | 2016 [ |
| | Streptavidin-conjugated CdSe QD545 | Ara h1 | Capillary pump | 200 μm width 60 μm height (PDMS) | •Linear detection range: 200–2000 ng/mL R2=0.9677 •LOD: 56 ng/mL •Response time: 10 min •Selective for Ara h1 | 2016 [ |
| Cellulose paper-QD: APTES/EDC/NHS | CdTe QD545–560 | Phycocyanin | Capillary action | Paper based microchannels | •Paper-based analytical device was developed (cheap and easy usable) •Linear detection range: 10−50 mg/L R2=0.988 •LOD: 2 mg/L •Response time: 25 min •Reproducibility RSD: 4.7% •Storage stability: Over 7 days •94.3−105.7% recovery (RSD: 3.6−5.7%) for sea water •93.1−106.7% recovery (RSD: 3.3−5.1%) for lake water | 2017 [ |
| QD@mSiO2-anti CEA and anti AFP: carbodiimide chemistry (EDC/NHS coupling) | CdSe/ZnS QD550 and 590 | CEA and AFP | Syringe pump | High aspect ratio (thin channels) Breadth: 0.02 cm Thickness: 0.01 cm | •Multiplex detection •Linear range of CEA and AFP detections are 1.8 pg/mL–1.8 ng/mL and 0.68 pg/mL to 0.68 ng/mL •More sensitive than ELISA kits •LODs of CEA and AFP are 0.6 and 0.2 pg/mL | 2019 [ |
| QD-Ab: EDC/NHS | CdTe QD525 and 605 | CEA and PSA | Capillary action | Paper based microchannels | •Multiplex detection at same detection zone •Paper based analytical device was developed (Cheap and easy usable) •Linear detection range: 1.0–40 ng/mL for both biomarkers •LODs: •Recovery for serum sample: 95–105% | 2019 [ |
MnO2-QD: NH2-MnO2 by APTES /COOH- QD by EDC/NHSS MnO2-QD-pAb: MnO2-QD/EDC/BSA/pAb | CdSe/ZnS QD651 | Syringe pump 25 μL/min | 400 μm height 2 mm length for mixing and incubation channel 11 mm length 3 mm width 1 mm height for separation chamber (PDMS) | •Linear detection range: 1.0×102 to 1.0×107 CFU/mL •LOD: 43 CFU/mL •Mean recovery for •Selective | 2020 [ | |
| QD-MIP: TGA-QD/EDC-NHS-APTES-glass fiber | ZnSe QD370∼400 | Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions | Capillary action | Paper-based microchannels | •Paper-based analytical device was developed (cheap and easy usable) •Linear detection range: 1 to 70 μg/L for Cd2+, 1 to 60 μg/L for Pb2+ R2=0.996, 0.993, respectively •LODs: 0.245 μg/L for Cd2+, 0.335 μg/L for Pb2+ •Sample volume: 30 μL •Selective •Recovery of sea water and lake water: 95.0%–105.1%, RSDs: 3.1%–5.6% | 2020 [ |
| Electrochemical affinity biosensors by quantum dots in microfluidic systems | ||||||
| QD-secondary Ab: EDC/NHS | CdTe and ZnSe QDs | cTnI and CRP | Syringe pump | (PDMS-GNP composite) | •Linear detection range: 0.01 to 50 μg/L for cTnI, 0.5 to 200 μg/L for CRP •LODs: 0.004 μg/L for cTnI, 0.22 μg/L for CRP •Sensitive | 2010 [ |
| QD-MIP: EDC-NHS-QD/AIBN-AM-EDGMA | CdTe QD (Light red emission) | S-fenvalerate | Capillary action | Paper-based microchannels | •Linear detection range: 10−8 to 10−6 mol/L •LOD: 3.5 × 10−9 mol/L •Sample volume: 10 μL •Selective, sensitive | 2013 [ |
Streptavidin-conjugated QD: Commercial | CdSe/ZnS QD585 | ApoE and hIgG | Syringe pump Flow rate: 5 μL/min | 500 μm wide 50 μm depth 3 cm long (PDMS) | •Linear detection range: 10 to 100 ng/mL for hIgG, 10 to 200 ng/mL for ApoE •LODs: 1.72 ng/mL for hIgG, 12.5 ng/mL for ApoE | 2014 [ |
| LB deposition of QD on ITO surface: TOPO capped CdSe QDs | CdSe QD | CML specific oligonucleotide sequences | Syringe pump Flow rate: 0.1–1.4 μL/min | ITO coated (thickness=150 Aͦ) glass substrate PDMS microchannels: 200 μm/200 μm/2cm (width/height/length) | •Linear detection range:1.0 μM–1 fM •At 1.0 μL/min flow rate, the response time of the microfluidics electrode is 60 s •It retains 90% of its response after 30 days of storage | 2015 [ |
| Streptavidin-conjugated QD: commercial | CdSe/ZnS QD655 | hIgG | Syringe pump Flow rate: 5 μL/min | 500 μm diameter and 50 μm thickness (PDMS) | •100-fold better in microflow (sensitivity: 20 × 10−6 A/nM) than in batch mode (sensitivity: 0.2 × 10−6 A/nM) •Response time: 6.6 min •LOD: 3.5 ng/mL RSD: 13.2% | 2016 [ |
| GQD immobilization on silanized alumina nonoporous membrane: GQD-glutaraldehyde-Ab | GQD | Enrofloxacin and ampicillin | Syringe pump Flow rate: 5 μL/min | 2 chamber was divided by a nanoporous membrane (PDMS) | •A new method for bacteria response to antibiotics investigation •Detection time: 30 min •Linear detection range: 1 nM to 100 pM for both targets •LODs: 1 pM for enrofloxacin, 40 pM for ampicillin | 2017 [ |
| QD-oligonucleotide | Streptavidin-conjugated CdSe/ZnS QD585 | Oligonucleotide | Capillary action | Paper-based microchannels: 135 μm/1.3 cm | •Paper-based analytical device was developed (cheap and easy usable) •Linear detection range: 0.50 pmol/L to 50 nmol/L R2=0.993 (n=5) •LOD: 0.11 pmol/L •Reproducibility of fabrication: 4.8%, DNA bioassay: 10.1–13.2% (% RSD) •Selective | 2018 [ |
Abbreviations: QDx: Emission wavelength at x nm, EDC: 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, NHS: N-hydroxysuccinimide, HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen, HCV: Hepatitis C virus, NSP4: HCV nonstructural protein 4, HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, gp41: HIV glycoprotein 41, IgG: Immunoglobulin G, BSA: Bovine serum albumin, CEA: Carcinoma embryonic antigen, AFP: α-fetoprotein, LOD: Limit of detection, Cy3: Cyanine, RSD: relative standard deviation, PSA: Prostate specific antigen, CA125: Carcinogenic antigen 125, PDMS: Polydimethylsiloxane, mSiO2: mesoporous SiO2, 2,4-D: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, SMCC: Succinimidyl 4-[N-maleimidomethyl]cyclo-hexane-1-carboxylate, DTT: Dithiothreitol, LB: Langmuir–Blodgett, ITO: Indium thin oxide, CML: Chronic myelogenous leukemia, TOPO: Trioctylphosphine oxide, AF488: Alexa Fluor 488, MIP: Molecularly imprinted polymer, NA: Not available, ConA: Concanavalin A, MPA: 3-Mercaptopropionic acid, pAb: polyclonal Ab, NHSS: N-Hydroxysulfosuccinimide sodium, MSN: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles, CTAB: (1-hexadecyl)trimethylammoniumbromide, TGA: thioglycolic acid, ApoE: ApolipoproteinE, hIgG: Human IgG, GQD: Graphene QD, cTnI: Cardiac troponin I, CRP: C-reactive protein, HP1: Hairpin probe1, GNP: Gold nanoparticle, APTES: (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane
Fig. 1Fluorescence photographs of probes incubated with different concentrations () MCF-7 cells (from a to e: 180, 2 × 103, 2 × 104, 105, and 2 × 106 cells/mL, respectively), () HL-60 cells (from a to e: 210, 3 × 103, 3 × 104, 3 × 105, and 3 × 106 cells/mL, respectively), and () K562 cells (from a to e: 200, 103, 2 × 104, 2 × 105, and 2 × 106 cells/mL, respectively). Fluorescence emission change after quenching QD fluorescence with GO structure at the end of hybridization of aptamer and cells at different concentrations, () MCF-7 cells (from a to h: 0, 180, 500, 2 × 103, 2 × 104, 105, 2 × 106, and 2 × 107 cells/mL, respectively), () HL-60 cells (from a to h: 0, 210, 500, 3 × 103, 3 × 104, 3 × 105, 3 × 106, and 3 × 107 cells/mL, respectively) and () K562 cells (from a to h: 0, 200, 500, 103, 2 × 104, 2 × 105, 2 × 106, and 2 × 107 cells/mL, respectively). Logarithmic calibration curve for () MCF-7 cell, () HL-60 cells and () K562 cells. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier
Fig. 2PEC signals from F-doped SnO2 conducting glass modified with hybrid structures (a) g-C3N4, (b) CdS, (c) g-C3N4@CdS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright © 2016, American Chemical Society
Fig. 3Schematic presentation of the electrochemical immunoassay procedure. (a) Electrochemical affinity assay for the detection of C533G mutation of RET gene and (b) electrochemical immunoassay for the detection of PSA in human serum. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [105]. Copyright © 2013, American Chemical Society
Fig. 4(a) hIgG injection from the inlet of the microchannel, anti-hIgG conjugated QD injection and washing step (left), microscopy image of microchannels (right) Ref. [54]. (b) Protein chip designed by immobilizing antibody to the surface of the PDMS channels. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright © 2010, American Chemical Society
Fig. 5Fiber optic system integrated to microfluidic system, light source, and syringe pump from Ref. [111]
Fig. 6Design of a QD–GO quenching biosensing system in microfluidic system. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64]. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier
Fig. 7(left) Schematic diagram of in situ synthesis of PDMS–GNP composite microreactors and immunoassay analytical procedure based on QD label. (right) Schematic representation of the electrochemical analysis via the flow injection mode on the microchip Ref. [14]
Fig. 8A microfluidic chip design with magnetic carrier supports which are collected in the detection zone by help of external magnetic force. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier
Fig. 9A design that allows Salmonella bacteria to be bound with magnetic particles and combined with MnO2-QD complex structure to detect GSH and QD in the separation chamber of the microfluidic system. Ref. [67]
Fig. 10Microfluidic chip with microbead array for virus DNA analysis. (a) An overview of the microfluidic chip design. (b) A cross section of the reaction and detection area. (c) Photograph of the microchip. (d) A microscope image of the reaction area. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier
Fig. 11(a) SEM images of beads in anisotropically etched silicon chip. (b) Chip (iv) is fitted between double-sided adhesive layer (ii) and cover slip (i) with laminate layers (iii, v, vi) included to direct fluid flow through PMMA base (viii) and inlet and outlet ports (vii). (c) Sealed LoC assembly. (d) Fluorescent image of beads after immunoassay including negative controls as imaged with one second of CCD camera integration (exposure) time. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright © 2009 Elsevier
Fig. 12Schematic representation of QD based μ-PAD design and fabrication allowing multiple detection. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier