Literature DB >> 32181847

Association Between Surgical Approach and Major Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Daniel Pincus1,2,3, Richard Jenkinson1,2, Michael Paterson3, Timothy Leroux1,4, Bheeshma Ravi1,2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Controversy exists about the preferred surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Objective: To determine whether an anterior approach is associated with lower risk of complications than either a lateral or posterior approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all adults in Ontario, Canada, who had undergone primary THA for osteoarthritis between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018. All patients were followed up over a 1-year period (study end date, March 31, 2019). Exposures: Surgical approach (anterior vs lateral/posterior) for THA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major surgical complications within 1 year (composite of deep infection requiring surgery, dislocation requiring closed or open reduction, or revision surgery). Outcomes were compared among propensity-score matched groups using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Of the 30 098 patients (mean [SD] age, 67 years [10.7 years]; 16 079 women [53.4%]) who underwent THA, 2995 (10%) underwent the anterior approach; 21 248 (70%), the lateral approach; and 5855 (20%) the posterior approach performed at 1 of 73 hospitals by 1 of 298 surgeons. All patients were followed up for 1 year. Compared with those undergoing the lateral or posterior approach, patients undergoing an anterior approach were younger (mean age, 65 vs 67 years; standardized difference, 0.17); had lower rates of morbid obesity (4.8% vs 7.6%; standardized difference, 0.12), diabetes (14.2% vs 19.9%; standardized difference, 0.15), and hypertension (53.4% vs 62.9%; standardized difference, 0.19); and were treated by higher-volume surgeons (median range, 111 procedures; interquartile range, 69-172 vs 77 procedures, interquartile range, 50-119 in the prior year; standardized difference, 0.55). Compared with 2993 propensity-score matched patients undergoing a lateral or posterior approach, the 2993 matched patients undergoing anterior approaches had a significantly greater risk of a major surgical complication (61 patients [2%] vs 29 patients [1%]; absolute risk difference, 1.07%; 95% CI, 0.46%-1.69%; hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.48 to 2.88). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, an anterior surgical approach compared with a posterior or lateral surgical approach was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk of major surgical complications. The findings may help inform decisions about surgical approach for hip arthroplasty, although further research is needed to understand pain and functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32181847      PMCID: PMC7078797          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

1.  The nature of increased hospital use in poor neighbourhoods: findings from a Canadian inner city.

Authors:  R H Glazier; E M Badley; J E Gilbert; L Rothman
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

2.  Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Javad Parvizi; Aidin Eslam Pour; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Krista Goulding; Paul E Beaulé; Paul R Kim; Anna Fazekas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Randomized Clinical Trial of 2-Incision vs Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Differences Persist at 10 Years.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Brian P Chalmers; Robert T Trousdale; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vinay K Aggarwal; A Elbuluk; J Dundon; C Herrero; C Hernandez; J M Vigdorchik; Ran Schwarzkopf; R Iorio; W J Long
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Is Operative Time a Predictor for Post-Operative Infection in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Hiba K Anis; Nipun Sodhi; Alison K Klika; Michael A Mont; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera; Robert M Molloy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm.

Authors:  Janet E Hux; Frank Ivis; Virginia Flintoft; Adina Bica
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Muhammad Mamdani; David A Alter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach: The pros and cons.

Authors:  Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Lazaros Poultsides; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-11-01
View more
  23 in total

1.  Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gary Tran; Lafi S Khalil; Allen Wrubel; Chad L Klochko; Jason J Davis; Steven B Soliman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Total Hip Arthroplasty: Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in the First Year of Practice.

Authors:  Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Scott A Muffly; Alan Shamrock; Olivia O'Reilly; Nicolas A Bedard; Jesse E Otero; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

3.  Compared learning curves of the direct anterior and anterolateral approach for minimally invasive hip replacement.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Georgi I Wassilew; Eberhard von Rottkay; Ulrich Noeth
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

4.  Limping and patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure; Antoine Poncet; Amanda Gonzalez; Christophe Barea; Didier Hannouche; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.925

Review 5.  Narrative Review of the Mechanism of Hip Prosthesis Dislocation and Methods to Reduce the Risk of Dislocation.

Authors:  Maciej Kostewicz; Grzegorz Szczęsny; Wiesław Tomaszewski; Paweł Małdyk
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-06-18

6.  The Burden of Osteoarthritis in the Middle East and North Africa Region From 1990 to 2019.

Authors:  Ali Shamekh; Mahasti Alizadeh; Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi; Mark J M Sullman; Jay S Kaufman; Gary S Collins; Ali-Asghar Kolahi; Saeid Safiri
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-23

7.  Is the Direct Anterior Approach to THA Cost-effective? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Ari R Berg; Michael B Held; Boshen Jiao; Eric Swart; Akshay Lakra; H John Cooper; Roshan P Shah; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 8.  The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leah Nairn; Lauren Gyemi; Kyle Gouveia; Seper Ekhtiari; Vickas Khanna
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: How to reduce complications - A 10-years single center experience and literature review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Rivera; Luca C Comba; Alessandro Bardelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-18

10.  Perioperative patient-specific factors-based nomograms predict short-term periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guangtao Fu; Mengyuan Li; Yunlian Xue; Qingtian Li; Zhantao Deng; Yuanchen Ma; Qiujian Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.