| Literature DB >> 32180968 |
Shaolin Deng1, Ming Li1, Huhu Wang1, Xinglian Xu1, Guanghong Zhou1.
Abstract
In order to commercialize soft-boiled chicken, a traditional Asian food, this work was performed to evaluate the effect of the packages on the edible quality. Soft-boiled chickens were packaged with air packaging (AP) or modified atmosphere packaging (MAP, MN:100% N2 and MC:30%CO2/70%N2) conditions. Total viable counts reached the acceptable limit of 4.90 Log CFU/g at 1.5, 2.5, and 4 days of storage under AP, MN, and MC, respectively. However, sensory acceptance limits, based on overall acceptance by the professional panelists, were not reached until one day later. The TVB-N content of MAP was lower than that of the AP. The finding indicated that the shelf life of soft-boiled chicken could be extended by two days using MAP with CO2. These findings will provide basic reference for the packaging of cooked meat and also provide information on poultry processing techniques that could be applied at commercial scales.Entities:
Keywords: modified atmosphere packaging; sensory evaluation; shelf life; soft‐boiled chicken
Year: 2020 PMID: 32180968 PMCID: PMC7063365 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Changes in the sensory properties of soft‐boiled chicken with different packaging
| Sensory | Storage time (days) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Structure | ||||||
| AP | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.50 ± 0.47Bb | 7.55 ± 0.44Ab | 5.95 ± 0.72Cc | 4.30 ± 0.82Cd | — |
| MN | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 8.00 ± 0.57Ab | 7.50 ± 0.47Ac | 6.55 ± 0.37Bd | 5.50 ± 0.71Be | 5.50 ± 0.62Be |
| MC | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 8.00 ± 0.41Ab | 7.60 ± 0.52Ab | 7.05 ± 0.16Ac | 6.60 ± 0.91Acd | 6.50 ± 0.71Ad |
| Appearance | ||||||
| AP | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.45 ± 0.69Ab | 6.80 ± 0.75Bbc | 6.30 ± 1.09Bc | 4.70 ± 0.67Cd | — |
| MN | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.45 ± 0.90Ab | 7.45 ± 0.64Ab | 6.80 ± 0.59ABb | 5.50 ± 0.53Bc | 5.45 ± 1.12Bc |
| MC | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.90 ± 0.74Ab | 7.50 ± 1.08Abc | 7.00 ± 0.47Acd | 6.40 ± 0.70Ade | 6.20 ± 0.63Ae |
| Odor | ||||||
| AP | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 6.60 ± 0.53Bb | 6.50 ± 0.67Bb | 4.80 ± 0.75Bc | 3.65 ± 0.58Cd | — |
| MN | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.35 ± 0.97Ab | 6.85 ± 0.58Bb | 6.15 ± 0.58Ac | 5.00 ± 0.41Bd | 4.90 ± 0.88Bd |
| MC | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.40 ± 0.94Ab | 7.30 ± 0.71Ab | 6.55 ± 0.69Ac | 6.50 ± 0.67Ac | 6.05 ± 0.60Ac |
| Surface slime | ||||||
| AP | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.40 ± 0.32Bb | 6.65 ± 0.41Bc | 5.90 ± 0.81Bd | 4.60 ± 0.52Ce | — |
| MN | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.65 ± 0.41Ab | 6.95 ± 0.37Bc | 6.50 ± 0.33Ac | 5.50 ± 0.71Bd | 5.00 ± 0.94Be |
| MC | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.65 ± 0.37Ab | 7.45 ± 0.37Ab | 6.70 ± 0.42Ac | 6.35 ± 0.97Ac | 6.45 ± 0.64Ac |
| Overall acceptance | ||||||
| AP | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.15 ± 0.63Bb | 6.80 ± 0.54Cb | 5.55 ± 0.55Cc | 4.25 ± 0.82Cd | — |
| MN | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 7.65 ± 0.58Ab | 7.20 ± 0.26Bb | 6.50 ± 0.47Bc | 5.60 ± 0.52Bd | 5.25 ± 0.95Bd |
| MC | 9.00 ± 0.00a | 8.00 ± 0.58Ab | 7.60 ± 0.66Abc | 7.15 ± 0.47Ac | 6.55 ± 0.72Ad | 6.45 ± 0.50Ad |
Values are expressed as the means ± standard deviations (n = 4). Different upper‐case letters (across rows) and different lower‐case letters (within sensory property) indicate significant differences (p < .05). AP, air packaging; MN, modified atmosphere packaging with 100% N2, and MC, modified atmosphere packaging with 30% CO2/70% N2.
Figure 1Headspace N2 and CO2 percentages of soft‐boiled chicken overtime in different package (MN = modified atmosphere packaging with 100% N2, and MC = modified atmosphere packaging with 30% CO2/70% N2). Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean (n = 4), and different letters indicate significant differences in gas concentrations between days (p < .05)
Changes in pH and color values of soft‐boiled chicken with different packaging
| Packaging | Storage times (days) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| AP | ||||||
| pH | 6.25 ± 0.02b | 6.21 ± 0.06Bb | 6.32 ± 0.15Ab | 6.31 ± 0.15Ab | 6.89 ± 0.15Aa | — |
|
| 74.37 ± 1.08a | 71.24 ± 1.80b | 68.62 ± 1.99bc | 69.57 ± 0.80bc | 67.20 ± 2.74c | — |
|
| 0.32 ± 1.23 | 0.78 ± 0.41 | 1.18 ± 0.45 | 0.85 ± 0.69 | 2.03 ± 0.38 | — |
|
| 29.34 ± 2.60 | 25.76 ± 2.21 | 26.16 ± 1.81 | 24.28 ± 1.19 | 21.76 ± 3.61 | — |
| MN | ||||||
| pH | 6.25 ± 0.02bc | 6.32 ± 0.05Ab | 6.14 ± 0.07Bbc | 6.32 ± 0.11Ab | 6.19 ± 0.05Bc | 6.54 ± 0.33Aa |
|
| 74.38 ± 1.08a | 68.17 ± 1.46b | 68.02 ± 2.09b | 68.25 ± 1.76b | 67.38 ± 2.09b | 66.22 ± 1.26b |
|
| 0.32 ± 1.23 | 2.23 ± 0.79 | 2.70 ± 0.89 | 1.85 ± 0.54 | 1.78 ± 0.67 | 2.43 ± 0.53 |
|
| 29.34 ± 2.60 | 26.85 ± 5.13 | 27.49 ± 1.27 | 27.08 ± 1.69 | 24.67 ± 5.24 | 23.15 ± 0.87 |
| MC | ||||||
| pH | 6.25 ± 0.02ab | 6.23 ± 0.05Bab | 6.22 ± 0.02ABab | 6.16 ± 0.04Ab | 6.15 ± 0.08Bb | 6.29 ± 0.11Ba |
|
| 74.38 ± 1.08a | 66.77 ± 5.06b | 67.48 ± 2.40b | 68.41 ± 0.76b | 68.73 ± 1.21b | 67.01 ± 1.72b |
|
| 0.32 ± 1.23 | 2.07 ± 0.77 | 1.60 ± 1.03 | 1.40 ± 0.66 | 2.68 ± 0.43 | 2.88 ± 0.55 |
|
| 29.34 ± 2.60 | 26.73 ± 1.35 | 25.30 ± 3.02 | 27.87 ± 3.03 | 25.75 ± 0.95 | 25.64 ± 0.89 |
Values are expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 4). AP, air packaging; MN, modified atmosphere packaging with 100% N2, and MC, modified atmosphere packaging with 30% CO2/70% N2.
Figure 2Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB‐N) concentrations of soft‐boiled chicken overtime packaged using different methods (AP = air packaging, MN = modified atmosphere packaging with 100% N2, and MC = modified atmosphere packaging with 30% CO2/70% N2). Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean (n = 4). Different lower‐case letters indicate significant differences within packaging treatment, and different upper‐case letters indicate significant differences within a given day (p < .05)
Figure 3Changes in total viable counts (TVC) (a); coliforms (b); and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (c) of soft‐boiled chicken with different packaging (stored at 12°C). Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean (n = 4). Different upper‐case letters indicate significant differences between treatments for a given storage time, and different lower‐case letters indicate significant differences overtime within different packaging treatments (p < .05)