| Literature DB >> 32180921 |
Yu Xuan Hu1, Jing Zhang1, Xiaoyan Wang1, Zhengyu Lu2, Fangfang Zhang1, Xiaofei Yang1, Zhihua Ma1, Jun Yin1, Haiping Xia2, Sheng Hua Liu1.
Abstract
Metalla-analogues of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have captivated chemists with their fascinating structures and unique electronic properties. To date, metallabenzene, metallanaphthalene and metallaanthracene have been reported. Metalla-analogues with more complicated fused rings have rarely been reported. Herein, we have successfully synthesized a series of new iridafluoranthenes and fused-ring iridafluoranthenes ranging from pentacyclic to heptacyclic metallaaromatic hydrocarbons in high yields under mild reaction conditions for the first time. Their photophysical and redox properties were also explored using UV-vis spectroscopy and electrochemistry combined with TD-DFT calculations. The present work may offer an important guideline for the design and construction of new polycyclic metallaaromatic hydrocarbons and metalla-nanographenes. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32180921 PMCID: PMC7046080 DOI: 10.1039/c9sc03914g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Organic PAHs and metalla-analogues.
Scheme 2Synthesis of target complexes 1–9.
Fig. 1Molecular structure of 1 (a and b), 2 (c), 3 (d), 5 (e and f), 6 (g), 8 (h) and 9 (i and j) (thermal ellipsoids set at 50% probability). Hydrogen atoms and the methyl group in Cp* and PMe3 are omitted for clarity.
Fig. 2UV/vis absorption spectra of complexes 1–9 (2.0 × 10–5 M) measured in CH2Cl2 at room temperature.
Detailed photophysical data and calculation results
| Compound |
| Excitation |
| Percentage | 1st | 1st |
|
| 379 (393) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.4074 | 91% | –1.21 | 0.98 |
|
| 378 (394) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.3799 | 94% | –1.24 | 0.72 |
|
| 388 (401) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.4428 | 80% | –1.27 | 0.98 |
|
| 398 (402) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.4158 | 70% | –1.05 | 1.09 |
|
| 420 (429) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.1776 | 65% | –0.99 | 0.83 |
|
| 422 (425) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.3625 | 78% | –1.20 | 0.97 |
|
| 428 (429) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.2863 | 95% | –1.07 | 0.96 |
|
| 490 (443) | HOMO–2 → LUMO | 0.1554 | 91% | –1.06 | 0.96 |
| 377 (394) | HOMO–5 → LUMO | 0.3277 | 76% | |||
|
| 482 (468) | HOMO–4 → LUMO | 0.2385 | 64% | –0.97 | 0.94 |
Selected molecular orbitals and energy levels of complexes 1–9
| Compound | Optimized structure (Δ | HOMO | LUMO | HOMO–4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 3Cyclic voltammograms of complexes 1–9 (2.0 × 10–3 M) measured in CH2Cl2 at room temperature (0.1 M, n-Bu4NPF6).