Biao Jin1, Xiao-Shu Wang1, Gang Huo1, Jia-Min Mou1, Gang Yang2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1# Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1# Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, People's Republic of China. yg_angcq@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The creation of bone flaps which can be later repositioned and fixed in situ for repairing the bone defects during the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs)-similar to transcranial craniotomies-is still a challenge. We present an in situ bone flap (ISBF) closure for the repair of bone defects after endoscopic endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approaches (EETAs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent the EETAs between January 2016 and February 2019 was performed. According to whether or not to use ISBF for skull base reconstruction, these patients were divided into the ISBF group or the non-ISBF group. RESULTS: Of 47 patients in the ISBF group, only one patient (2.1%) developed postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, yielding a significantly lower leakage rate in the ISBF group than in the non-ISBF group (6 of 38, 15.8%, P = 0.042). Besides, when only comparing cases of hydrocephalus in the two groups, the CSF leakage rate in the ISBF group was 8.3% (1/12), which was still significantly lower than that in the non-ISBF group (62.5%, 6/8) (P = 0.018). Postoperative CSF leakages in both groups were successfully treated with lumbar drainage alone, and no cases of injury to the internal carotid arteries or optic nerves occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: An ISBF closure similar to transcranial craniotomies with repositioning bone flap in situ-is feasible, safe, and reliable. The ISBF closure combining with a pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) provides the cranial base surgeon with an additional repair method that has demonstrated effectiveness at facilitating a more stable and durable reconstruction and reducing CSF leaks.
PURPOSE: The creation of bone flaps which can be later repositioned and fixed in situ for repairing the bone defects during the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs)-similar to transcranial craniotomies-is still a challenge. We present an in situ bone flap (ISBF) closure for the repair of bone defects after endoscopic endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approaches (EETAs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent the EETAs between January 2016 and February 2019 was performed. According to whether or not to use ISBF for skull base reconstruction, these patients were divided into the ISBF group or the non-ISBF group. RESULTS: Of 47 patients in the ISBF group, only one patient (2.1%) developed postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, yielding a significantly lower leakage rate in the ISBF group than in the non-ISBF group (6 of 38, 15.8%, P = 0.042). Besides, when only comparing cases of hydrocephalus in the two groups, the CSF leakage rate in the ISBF group was 8.3% (1/12), which was still significantly lower than that in the non-ISBF group (62.5%, 6/8) (P = 0.018). Postoperative CSF leakages in both groups were successfully treated with lumbar drainage alone, and no cases of injury to the internal carotid arteries or optic nerves occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: An ISBF closure similar to transcranial craniotomies with repositioning bone flap in situ-is feasible, safe, and reliable. The ISBF closure combining with a pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) provides the cranial base surgeon with an additional repair method that has demonstrated effectiveness at facilitating a more stable and durable reconstruction and reducing CSF leaks.
Entities:
Keywords:
Endoscopic endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approaches; High-flow CSF leakage; In situ bone flap; Skull base reconstruction
Authors: Domenico Catapano; Chris A Sloffer; Giorgio Frank; Ernesto Pasquini; Vincenzo A D'Angelo; Giuseppe Lanzino Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Maria Koutourousiou; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; S Tonya Stefko; Eric W Wang; Carl H Snyderman; Paul A Gardner Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jean Anderson Eloy; Richard J Vivero; Kimberly Hoang; Frank J Civantos; Donald T Weed; Jacques J Morcos; Roy R Casiano Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Luigi M Cavallo; Daniel M Prevedello; Domenico Solari; Paul A Gardner; Felice Esposito; Carl H Snyderman; Ricardo L Carrau; Amin B Kassam; Paolo Cappabianca Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Paul A Gardner; Amin B Kassam; Ajith Thomas; Carl H Snyderman; Ricardo L Carrau; Arlan H Mintz; Daniel M Prevedello Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Luigi Maria Cavallo; Andrea Messina; Felice Esposito; Oreste de Divitiis; Mateus Dal Fabbro; Enrico de Divitiis; Paolo Cappabianca Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Zhuo-Ya Zhou; Xiao-Shu Wang; Yang Gong; Ode La Ali Musyafar; Jiao-Jiao Yu; Gang Huo; Jia-Min Mou; Gang Yang Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Danyal Z Khan; Ahmad M S Ali; Chan Hee Koh; Neil L Dorward; Joan Grieve; Hugo Layard Horsfall; William Muirhead; Thomas Santarius; Wouter R Van Furth; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Hani J Marcus Journal: Pituitary Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.107