Literature DB >> 25270144

Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Brian D Thorp1, Satyan B Sreenath, Charles S Ebert, Adam M Zanation.   

Abstract

Endoscopic skull base surgery continues to rapidly evolve, requiring comparable advances in reconstructive techniques. While smaller skull base defects with low intraoperative CSF flow have been successfully managed with a variety of avascular and/or noncellular techniques, larger defects with high CSF flow require more robust repairs often in the form of vascularized flaps, which confer excellent success rates in this setting. Despite these successful outcomes, a paucity of data describing specific patient and operative characteristics and their effects on repair exist. Therefore, a retrospective, consecutive chart review was performed on patients who underwent endoscopic skull base reconstruction with a vascularized flap in the setting of intraoperative CSF leaks. In this series, 151 patients with a mean age of 51 years underwent 152 vascularized flap skull base reconstructions for an array of benign and malignant pathologies. These vascularized flaps included 144 nasoseptal flaps, 6 endoscopic-assisted pericranial flaps, 1 facial artery buccinator flap, and 1 inferior turbinate flap that were used throughout all regions of the skull base. Perioperative (< 3 months) and postoperative (> 3 months) flap complications were assessed and revealed 3 perioperative flap defects (2.0%) defined as a visualized defect within the substrate of the flap and a total of 5 perioperative CSF leaks (3.3%). No patient experienced flap death/complete flap loss in the cohort. Assessed postoperative flap complications included 1 case (0.7%) of mucocele formation, 8 cases (5.3%) of prolonged skull base crusting, and 2 cases (1.3%) of donor-site complication, specifically septal perforation secondary to nasoseptal flap harvest. Among the 152 cases identified, 37 patients received radiation therapy while 114 patients did not undergo radiation therapy as part of the treatment profile. No significant association was found between perioperative complication rates and radiation therapy (p = 0.634). However, a significant association was found between postoperative complication rates and radiation therapy, primarily accounted for by an increased risk for prolonged (> 6 months) skull base crusting (p = 0.025). It is clear that larger skull base defects with high intraoperative CSF flow require thoughtful approach and strong consideration for vascularized repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; FAB = facial artery buccinators flap; ITF = inferior turbinate flap; NSF = nasoseptal flap; PCF = pericranial flap; SNUC = sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma; skull base reconstruction; skull base surgery; vascularized repair

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25270144     DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.FOCUS14350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  29 in total

1.  Complications of Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Philippe Lavigne; Daniel L Faden; Eric W Wang; Carl H Snyderman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-08-20

2.  Acellular dermal matrix as an alternative to autologous fascia lata for skull base repair following extended endoscopic endonasal approaches.

Authors:  Brett E Youngerman; Jennifer A Kosty; Mina M Gerges; Abtin Tabaee; Ashutosh Kacker; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Nasal Deformities Following Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction of Skull Base Defects.

Authors:  Nicholas R Rowan; Eric W Wang; Paul A Gardner; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Carl H Snyderman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-07-07

4.  Reconstruction of skull base bone defects using an in situ bone flap after endoscopic endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approaches.

Authors:  Biao Jin; Xiao-Shu Wang; Gang Huo; Jia-Min Mou; Gang Yang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Open Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction: A Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Daniel Kwon; Alfred Iloreta; Brett Miles; Jared Inman
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  A new multilayer reconstruction using nasal septal flap combined with fascia graft dural suturing for high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal surgery.

Authors:  Kentaro Horiguchi; Hiroshi Nishioka; Noriaki Fukuhara; Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Impact of Multilayer Vascularized Reconstruction after Skull Base Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Simal-Julián; Pablo Miranda-Lloret; Laila Pérez de San Román Mena; Pablo Sanromán-Álvarez; Alfonso García-Piñero; Rosa Sanchis-Martín; Carlos Botella-Asunción; Amin Kassam
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-28

8.  An Algorithm for Sellar Reconstruction Following the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach: A Review of 300 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Edward C Kuan; Frederick Yoo; Pratik B Patel; Brooke M Su; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-08-28

Review 9.  Pituitary adenomas: historical perspective, surgical management and future directions.

Authors:  Debebe Theodros; Mira Patel; Jacob Ruzevick; Michael Lim; Chetan Bettegowda
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  Outcomes of Middle Turbinate Flap in the Reconstruction of Non-tumorous Ventral Skull Base Defects - an Institutional Review.

Authors:  Vinoth Manimaran; Somu Lakshmanan; Aishwarya Prateep; Ramya Baburajan
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.