Literature DB >> 32179606

Dedicated Workforce Required to Support Large-Scale Practice Improvement.

Shannon M Sweeney1, Jennifer R Hemler2, Andrea N Baron2, Tanisha T Woodson2, Sarah S Ono2, Leah Gordon2, Benjamin F Crabtree2, Deborah J Cohen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facilitation is an effective approach for helping practices implement sustainable evidence-based practice improvements. Few studies examine the facilitation infrastructure and support needed for large-scale dissemination and implementation initiatives.
METHODS: The Agency for Health care Research and Quality funded 7 Cooperatives, each of which worked with over 200 primary care practices to rapidly disseminate and implement improvements in cardiovascular preventive care. The intervention target was to improve primary care practice capacity for quality initiative and the ABCS of cardiovascular disease prevention: aspirin in high-risk individuals, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation. We identified the organizational elements and infrastructures Cooperatives used to support facilitators by reviewing facilitator logs, online diary data, semistructured interviews with facilitators, and fieldnotes from facilitator observations. We analyzed these data using a coding and sorting process.
RESULTS: Each Cooperative partnered with 2 to 16 organizations, piecing together 16 to 35 facilitators, often from other quality improvement projects. Quality assurance strategies included establishing initial and ongoing training, processes to support facilitators, and monitoring to assure consistency and quality. Cooperatives developed facilitator toolkits, implemented initiative-specific training, and developed processes for peer-to-peer learning and support.
CONCLUSIONS: Supporting a large-scale facilitation workforce requires creating an infrastructure, including initial training, and ongoing support and monitoring, often borrowing from other ongoing initiatives. Facilitation that recognizes the need to support the vital integrating functions of primary care might be more efficient and effective than this fragmented approach to quality improvement. © Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery of Health Care; Evidence-Based Practice; Preventive Health Services; Primary Health Care; Qualitative Research; Quality Improvement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32179606     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  4 in total

1.  Effective Facilitator Strategies for Supporting Primary Care Practice Change: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Shannon M Sweeney; Andrea Baron; Jennifer D Hall; David Ezekiel-Herrera; Rachel Springer; Rikki L Ward; Miguel Marino; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Deborah J Cohen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.707

2.  Content and Actionability of Recommendations to Providers After Shadow Coaching.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Nabeel Qureshi; Alina Palimaru; Chau Pham; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 1.147

3.  Place Matters: Closing the Gap on Rural Primary Care Quality Improvement Capacity-the Healthy Hearts Northwest Study.

Authors:  Lyle J Fagnan; Katrina Ramsey; Caitlin Dickinson; Tara Kline; Michael L Parchman
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Findings and lessons learnt implementing a cardiovascular disease quality improvement program in Australian primary care: a mixed method evaluation.

Authors:  C M Hespe; K Giskes; M F Harris; D Peiris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.