Josephine N Booth1, Ross A Chesham2, Naomi E Brooks2, Trish Gorely3, Colin N Moran2. 1. Moray House School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ, Scotland, UK. Josie.Booth@ed.ac.uk. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. 3. School of Health, Social Care and Life Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Sciences, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: School-based physical activity and running programmes, such as The Daily Mile™, are increasing in popularity globally. The aim of this research was to examine the acute impact of such classroom physical activity breaks on cognition and affective wellbeing. METHODS: A total of 5463 school pupils from 332 schools took part in a citizen science project with a repeated measures design. They completed tasks of cognition (inhibition, verbal, and visuo-spatial working memory) and the Children's Feeling Scale and Felt Arousal Scale before and after three different outdoor activities: a classroom break of 15 min of self-paced activity, a near maximal exhaustion activity (the bleep test), and a no-exercise control group where pupils sat or stood outside. Wellbeing and fitness were examined as mediators of the relationship between outdoor activity and cognition. RESULTS: Fifteen minutes of self-paced outdoor activity was beneficial for pupils' cognition and wellbeing in comparison to both other activities (Cohen's d effect sizes ranging from 0.04 to 0.22; small). The relationship with cognition was not mediated by participants' fitness level and was only partially mediated by wellbeing. Change scores for alertness were higher after the bleep test compared to the control activity but similar for all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a break from the classroom to complete 15 min of self-paced physical activity should be considered a worthwhile activity by class teachers, school management, and policymakers. Additionally, more intense physical activity should not be considered to be detrimental.
BACKGROUND: School-based physical activity and running programmes, such as The Daily Mile™, are increasing in popularity globally. The aim of this research was to examine the acute impact of such classroom physical activity breaks on cognition and affective wellbeing. METHODS: A total of 5463 school pupils from 332 schools took part in a citizen science project with a repeated measures design. They completed tasks of cognition (inhibition, verbal, and visuo-spatial working memory) and the Children's Feeling Scale and Felt Arousal Scale before and after three different outdoor activities: a classroom break of 15 min of self-paced activity, a near maximal exhaustion activity (the bleep test), and a no-exercise control group where pupils sat or stood outside. Wellbeing and fitness were examined as mediators of the relationship between outdoor activity and cognition. RESULTS: Fifteen minutes of self-paced outdoor activity was beneficial for pupils' cognition and wellbeing in comparison to both other activities (Cohen's d effect sizes ranging from 0.04 to 0.22; small). The relationship with cognition was not mediated by participants' fitness level and was only partially mediated by wellbeing. Change scores for alertness were higher after the bleep test compared to the control activity but similar for all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a break from the classroom to complete 15 min of self-paced physical activity should be considered a worthwhile activity by class teachers, school management, and policymakers. Additionally, more intense physical activity should not be considered to be detrimental.
Authors: Lorna M Hatch; Ryan A Williams; Karah J Dring; Caroline Sunderland; Mary E Nevill; Simon B Cooper Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Emerald G Heiland; Karin Kjellenberg; Olga Tarassova; Maria Fernström; Gisela Nyberg; Maria M Ekblom; Björg Helgadottir; Örjan Ekblom Journal: Trials Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Karah J Dring; Lorna M Hatch; Ryan A Williams; John G Morris; Caroline Sunderland; Mary E Nevill; Simon B Cooper Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Bina Ram; Anna Chalkley; Esther van Sluijs; Rachel Phillips; Tishya Venkatraman; Dougal S Hargreaves; Russell M Viner; Sonia Saxena Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.692