Literature DB >> 32175871

Revisiting Parameter Estimation in Biological Networks: Influence of Symmetries.

Jithin K Sreedharan, Krzysztof Turowski, Wojciech Szpankowski.   

Abstract

Graph models often give us a deeper understanding of real-world networks. In the case of biological networks they help in predicting the evolution and history of biomolecule interactions, provided we map properly real networks into the corresponding graph models. In this paper, we show that for biological graph models many of the existing parameter estimation techniques overlook the critical property of graph symmetry (also known formally as graph automorphisms), thus the estimated parameters give statistically insignificant results concerning the observed network. To demonstrate it and to develop accurate estimation procedures, we focus on the biologically inspired duplication-divergence model, and the up-to-date data of protein-protein interactions of seven species including human and yeast. Using exact recurrence relations of some prominent graph statistics, we devise a parameter estimation technique that provides the right order of symmetries and uses phylogenetically old proteins as the choice of seed graph nodes. We also find that our results are consistent with the ones obtained from maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). However, the MLE approach is significantly slower than our methods in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32175871      PMCID: PMC8555700          DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2020.2980260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.702


  18 in total

1.  Some asymptotic properties of duplication graphs.

Authors:  Alpan Raval
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-12-30

2.  Duplication models for biological networks.

Authors:  Fan Chung; Linyuan Lu; T Gregory Dewey; David J Galas
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Duplication-divergence model of protein interaction network.

Authors:  I Ispolatov; P L Krapivsky; A Yuryev
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-06-22

4.  A likelihood approach to analysis of network data.

Authors:  Carsten Wiuf; Markus Brameier; Oskar Hagberg; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dense graphlet statistics of protein interaction and random networks.

Authors:  R Colak; F Hormozdiari; F Moser; A Schönhuth; J Holman; M Ester; S C Sahinalp
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2009

6.  Choosing appropriate models for protein-protein interaction networks: a comparison study.

Authors:  Mingyu Shao; Yi Yang; Jihong Guan; Shuigeng Zhou
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  ProteinHistorian: tools for the comparative analysis of eukaryote protein origin.

Authors:  John A Capra; Alexander G Williams; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Inferring Temporal Information from a Snapshot of a Dynamic Network.

Authors:  Jithin K Sreedharan; Abram Magner; Ananth Grama; Wojciech Szpankowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Not all scale-free networks are born equal: the role of the seed graph in PPI network evolution.

Authors:  Fereydoun Hormozdiari; Petra Berenbrink; Natasa Przulj; S Cenk Sahinalp
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.