Literature DB >> 14633392

Duplication models for biological networks.

Fan Chung1, Linyuan Lu, T Gregory Dewey, David J Galas.   

Abstract

Are biological networks different from other large complex networks? Both large biological and nonbiological networks exhibit power-law graphs (number of nodes with degree k, N(k) approximately k(-beta)), yet the exponents, beta, fall into different ranges. This may be because duplication of the information in the genome is a dominant evolutionary force in shaping biological networks (like gene regulatory networks and protein-protein interaction networks) and is fundamentally different from the mechanisms thought to dominate the growth of most nonbiological networks (such as the Internet). The preferential choice models used for nonbiological networks like web graphs can only produce power-law graphs with exponents greater than 2. We use combinatorial probabilistic methods to examine the evolution of graphs by node duplication processes and derive exact analytical relationships between the exponent of the power law and the parameters of the model. Both full duplication of nodes (with all their connections) as well as partial duplication (with only some connections) are analyzed. We demonstrate that partial duplication can produce power-law graphs with exponents less than 2, consistent with current data on biological networks. The power-law exponent for large graphs depends only on the growth process, not on the starting graph.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14633392     DOI: 10.1089/106652703322539024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  44 in total

1.  A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Eric J Deeds; Orr Ashenberg; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Duplication-divergence model of protein interaction network.

Authors:  I Ispolatov; P L Krapivsky; A Yuryev
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-06-22

3.  A likelihood approach to analysis of network data.

Authors:  Carsten Wiuf; Markus Brameier; Oskar Hagberg; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Inherent size constraints on prokaryote gene networks due to "accelerating" growth.

Authors:  M J Gagen; J S Mattick
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  Degree dependence in rates of transcription factor evolution explains the unusual structure of transcription networks.

Authors:  Alexander J Stewart; Robert M Seymour; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Algorithmic and analytical methods in network biology.

Authors:  Mehmet Koyutürk
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun

7.  Expression-based network biology identifies alteration in key regulatory pathways of type 2 diabetes and associated risk/complications.

Authors:  Urmi Sengupta; Sanchaita Ukil; Nevenka Dimitrova; Shipra Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Difference in gene duplicability may explain the difference in overall structure of protein-protein interaction networks among eukaryotes.

Authors:  Takeshi Hase; Yoshihito Niimura; Hiroshi Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Adaptive importance sampling for network growth models.

Authors:  Adam N Guetz; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Ann Oper Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.854

10.  Biomolecular network motif counting and discovery by color coding.

Authors:  Noga Alon; Phuong Dao; Iman Hajirasouliha; Fereydoun Hormozdiari; S Cenk Sahinalp
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.