BACKGROUND: Although preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently considered effective for treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a proportion of patients develop postoperative pulmonary metastases. The current study aimed to assess the prognostic characteristics and risk factors for the development of rectal cancer pulmonary metastases after CRT and radical resection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected on 544 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with LARC and underwent preoperative CRT followed by tumor radical resection between December 2003 and June 2014. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pulmonary metastasis rates were calculated and compared among the subgroups, and risk factors for pulmonary metastases were identified by Cox models. RESULTS: A total of 61 (11.2%) patients developed pulmonary metastases postoperatively, 45 of whom (73.8%) developed the condition in the first 24 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year pulmonary metastasis rates were 6.7%, 10.4%, and 11.7%, respectively. Compared with the disease-free group, the pulmonary metastases group had a significantly lower proportion of downstaging and pathological complete regression (pCR) rate and a significantly higher proportion of low rectum tumor. In multivariate analysis, a distance of the tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge [hazard ratio (HR), 1.394; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.211-3.736; P=0.003] was identified as an independent negative predictor of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate, and N0 stage (HR, 0.490; 95% CI, 0.261-0.919; P=0.026) and TNM downstaging (HR, 0.514; 95% CI, 0.265-0.997; P=0.049) were identified as independent positive predictors of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastases warranted a more intensive follow-up in patients with low rectal cancer, lymph node metastases and poor response after preoperative CRT and radical tumor resection. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Although preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently considered effective for treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a proportion of patients develop postoperative pulmonary metastases. The current study aimed to assess the prognostic characteristics and risk factors for the development of rectal cancer pulmonary metastases after CRT and radical resection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected on 544 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with LARC and underwent preoperative CRT followed by tumor radical resection between December 2003 and June 2014. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pulmonary metastasis rates were calculated and compared among the subgroups, and risk factors for pulmonary metastases were identified by Cox models. RESULTS: A total of 61 (11.2%) patients developed pulmonary metastases postoperatively, 45 of whom (73.8%) developed the condition in the first 24 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year pulmonary metastasis rates were 6.7%, 10.4%, and 11.7%, respectively. Compared with the disease-free group, the pulmonary metastases group had a significantly lower proportion of downstaging and pathological complete regression (pCR) rate and a significantly higher proportion of low rectum tumor. In multivariate analysis, a distance of the tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge [hazard ratio (HR), 1.394; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.211-3.736; P=0.003] was identified as an independent negative predictor of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate, and N0 stage (HR, 0.490; 95% CI, 0.261-0.919; P=0.026) and TNM downstaging (HR, 0.514; 95% CI, 0.265-0.997; P=0.049) were identified as independent positive predictors of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastases warranted a more intensive follow-up in patients with low rectal cancer, lymph node metastases and poor response after preoperative CRT and radical tumor resection. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Authors: K M Augestad; P M Bakaki; J Rose; B P Crawshaw; R O Lindsetmo; L M Dørum; S M Koroukian; C P Delaney Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carlo Capirci; Vincenzo Valentini; Luca Cionini; Antonino De Paoli; Claus Rodel; Robert Glynne-Jones; Claudio Coco; Mario Romano; Giovanna Mantello; Silvia Palazzi; Falchetti Osti Mattia; Maria Luisa Friso; Domenico Genovesi; Cristiana Vidali; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Alberto Buffoli; Marco Lupattelli; Maria Silvia Favretto; Giuseppe La Torre Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Luca Stocchi; Andre da Luz Moreira; Daniel Geisler; David W Dietz; Ian C Lavery; Victor W Fazio; Matthew F Kalady Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Yong Sang Hong; Tae Won Kim; Jin-Hong Park; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen; Peter-Martin Krarup; Lars N Jorgensen; Peer A Wille-Jørgensen; Henrik Harling Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Marco Tampellini; Azzurra Ottone; Elisa Bellini; Irene Alabiso; Chiara Baratelli; Raffaella Bitossi; Maria P Brizzi; Anna Ferrero; Elisa Sperti; Francesco Leone; Stefania Miraglia; Laura Forti; Erica Bertona; Francesco Ardissone; Alfredo Berruti; Oscar Alabiso; Massimo Aglietta; Giorgio V Scagliotti Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-09-06
Authors: David Sebag-Montefiore; Richard J Stephens; Robert Steele; John Monson; Robert Grieve; Subhash Khanna; Phil Quirke; Jean Couture; Catherine de Metz; Arthur Sun Myint; Eric Bessell; Gareth Griffiths; Lindsay C Thompson; Mahesh Parmar Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 79.321