Literature DB >> 15622571

Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for a better outcome.

Salvatore Pucciarelli1, Paola Toppan, Maria Luisa Friso, Valentina Russo, Lara Pasetto, Emanuele Urso, Filippo Marino, Alessandro Ambrosi, Mario Lise.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with pathologic tumor response following pre-operative chemoradiation therapy, and the prognostic impact of pathologic response on overall and disease-free survival.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 2002, 132 patients underwent chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery for middle to lower rectal cancer. After excluding 26 cases (metastatic cancer, n = 13; nonradical surgery, n = 6; local excision procedure, n = 4; non-5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, n = 2; incomplete data on preoperative chemoradiation therapy regimen used, n = 1), the remaining 106 patients were included in the study. Variables considered were the following: age, gender, tumor location, pretreatment T and N stage, modality of 5-fluorouracil administration, total radiotherapy dose delivered, chemoradiation therapy regimen used (Regimen A: chemotherapy (bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, days 1-5 and 29-33) + radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 F/1.8 Gy/F); Regimen B: chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil continuous venous infusion +/- weekly bolus of carboplatin or oxaliplatin) + radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 F/1.8 Gy/F)), time interval between completion of chemoradiation therapy and surgery, postoperative chemotherapy administration, surgical procedures, pT, pN, and pTNM stage, and response to chemoradiation therapy defined as tumor regression grade, scored from 1 (no tumor on surgical specimen) to 5 (absence of regressive changes). Statistical analysis was performed by means of logistic regression analysis (Cox's model for overall and disease-free survival).
RESULTS: Median age of the 106 patients was 60 (range, 31-79) years and the male:female ratio, 66:40. Median distance of tumor from the anal verge was 6 (range, 1-11) cm. Pretreatment TNM stage, available in 104 patients, was cT3T4N0, n = 41; cT2N1, n = 9; cT3N1, n = 39; and cT4N1, n = 17. The median radiotherapy dose delivered was 50.4 (range, 40-56) Gy; 58 patients received 5-fluorouracil by continuous venous infusion, and carboplatin with oxaliplatin was added to the chemotherapy schedule in 71 cases. Patients were given Regimen A in 47 cases and Regimen B in 59. The median interval between chemoradiation therapy and surgery was 42.5 (range, 19-136) days, and 94 patients underwent a sphincter-saving procedure. Tumor regression grade, available in 104 cases, was 1, n = 19; 2, n = 18; 3, n = 15; 4, n = 13; and 5, n = 39. At a median follow-up of 42 (range, 1-110) months, 11 patients had died, and 95 were alive. None of the patients had local recurrences, but 13 had distant recurrences. At logistic regression analysis, the chemoradiation therapy regimen used was the only independent predictor of tumor response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.67, P = 0.003). At Cox's regression analysis, pretreatment T stage was the only independent prognostic factor for both disease-free survival (relative risk = 7.13, 95% confidence interval = 2.3-21.8, P = 0.001) and overall survival (relative risk = 4.83, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-19.9, P = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy is mainly related to the preoperative regimen used. For patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation therapy, pretreatment T stage, but not tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy, is prognostic for outcome (both disease-free and overall survival).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15622571     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0681-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  42 in total

1.  A multi-centre pathologist survey on pathological processing and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Runjan Chetty; Pelvender Gill; Dhirendra Govender; Adrian Bateman; Hee Jin Chang; David Driman; Fraser Duthie; Marisa Gomez; Eleanor Jaynes; Cheok Soon Lee; Michael Locketz; Claudia Mescoli; Corwyn Rowsell; Anne Rullier; Stefano Serra; Neil Shepherd; Eva Szentgyorgyi; Rajkumar Vajpeyi; Lai Mun Wang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Signet ring cell histology and non-circumferential tumors predict pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancers.

Authors:  Sunil Bhanu Jayanand; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Ritesh Tapkire
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Usefulness of two independent histopathological classifications of tumor regression in patients with rectal cancer submitted to hyperfractionated pre-operative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lukasz Liszka; Ewa Zielińska-Pajak; Jacek Pajak; Dariusz Gołka; Jacek Starzewski; Zbigniew Lorenc
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Abdominoperineal resection: how is it done and what are the results?

Authors:  W Brian Perry; J Christopher Connaughton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

5.  CoA Synthase (COASY) Mediates Radiation Resistance via PI3K Signaling in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sylvain Ferrandon; Jennifer DeVecchio; Leonardo Duraes; Hanumant Chouhan; Georgios Karagkounis; Jacqueline Davenport; Matthew Orloff; David Liska; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Changing operative strategy from abdominoperineal resection to sphincter preservation in T3 low rectal cancer after downstaging by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Khaled M Madbouly; Ahmed M Hussein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Incidence of Metachronous Distant Metastasis and ypN Classification Influence Patient Survival in Endosonographically Confirmed uT3 Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy and R0 Resection: A Historical Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Achim Troja; Hans-Günther Hempen; Mareike Demmer; Dalibor Antolovic; Hans-Rudolf Raab
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-01-06

8.  Neoadjuvant oral vs. infusional chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer: Prognostic factors.

Authors:  Sofia Conde; Margarida Borrego; Tânia Teixeira; Rubina Teixeira; Anabela Sá; Paula Soares
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-08-21

9.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Health-related quality of life, faecal continence and bowel function in rectal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery.

Authors:  Salvatore Pucciarelli; Paola Del Bianco; Fabio Efficace; Paola Toppan; Samantha Serpentini; Maria Luisa Friso; Sara Lonardi; Gian Luca De Salvo; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.