Literature DB >> 32175351

A preliminary study on a patented intrauterine stent in the treatment of recurrent intrauterine adhesions with poor prognosis.

Huan Huang1, Lingxiao Zou1, Aiqian Zhang1, Xingping Zhao1, Dabao Xu1, Min Xue1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) is challenging, mainly because there is no ideal method to prevent its recurrence. Recurrence of moderate to severe IUAs after conventional treatments entails a poorer prognosis in these patients. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a patented intrauterine stent as a barrier in the treatment of recurrent IUAs with poor prognosis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of 13 women with IUAs, admitted to the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from June 2018 to September 2019. After conventional treatments, moderate to severe adhesions were still evident. Then a patented intrauterine stent was used as a barrier to prevent the reformation of adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA). All cases received a second-look hysteroscopy after 2-3 menstrual cycles. American Fertility Society (AFS) scores were noted for all cases. Menstrual pattern, recurrence of adhesions, and reproductive outcomes were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean number of previous HA of the 13 patients was 2.7, and mean AFS score after conventional treatments was still 8.7. Before the use of the stent, 46.2% of the patients had amenorrhea caused by IUAs. After using the intrauterine stent as a barrier, the mean AFS score was 1.7. The menstrual improvement rate was 100%, while the rate of resumption of normal menstrual volume was 53.8%. The second-look hysteroscopy revealed a correct position of the stents and no obvious recurrence of IUAs in all cases. After the removal of the stent, the patients were followed up for 2-13 months (mean: 7 months), and no amenorrhea was observed, the recurrence rate of IUAs was 25.0% and one patient got pregnant.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in the recurrent IUAs patients with very poor prognosis, the patented intrauterine stent has been proved to be very effective in preventing the recurrence of adhesions, on condition that its correct position inside the uterine cavity is achieved. Due to the extremely poor nature of the studied population, the recurrent rate of IUAs and pregnancy rate after the removal of the stent is still discouraging, although the improvement in menstruation is inspiring. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs); adhesion reformation; hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA); hysteroscopy; intrauterine stent

Year:  2020        PMID: 32175351      PMCID: PMC7049051          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  14 in total

1.  INTRAUTERINE ADHESIONS: ETIOLOGY, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT.

Authors:  E RABAU; A DAVID
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions.

Authors:  J G ASHERMAN
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp       Date:  1950-12

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome.

Authors:  Angelo B Hooker; Marike Lemmers; Andreas L Thurkow; Martijn W Heymans; Brent C Opmeer; Hans A M Brölmann; Ben W Mol; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Hysteroscopic Intrauterine Adhesiolysis Using the "Ploughing" Technique With Cold Scissors.

Authors:  Aiqian Zhang; Grace Jamail; Min Xue; Xiaoming Guan; Songshu Xiao; Dabao Xu
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Role of uterine adhesions in the cause of multiple pregnancy losses.

Authors:  W Shaffer
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 7.  Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal.

Authors:  J G Schenker; E J Margalioth
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Hysteroscopic Intrauterine Adhesiolysis Using a Blunt Spreading Dissection Technique With Double-action Forceps.

Authors:  Huan Huang; Chunxia Cheng; Grace Johnson; Ruoyi Wang; Min Xue; Aiqian Zhang; Dabao Xu; Xiaoming Guan
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 9.  Management of Asherman's syndrome.

Authors:  Charles M March
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 10.  Efficacy of intrauterine device in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions.

Authors:  Umme Salma; Min Xue; Ali Sheikh Md Sayed; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Uterine Cavity Parameters Evaluated by Hysteroscopy can Predict the Live Birth Rate For Intrauterine Adhesion Patients.

Authors:  Xingping Zhao; Dan Sun; Aiqian Zhang; Huan Huang; Xiuting Zhu; Shuijing Yi; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.