Literature DB >> 32175348

Diagnosis and treatment of cervical incompetence combined with intrauterine adhesions.

Waixing Li1, Yueran Li1, Xingping Zhao1, Chunxia Cheng1, Arvind Burjoo1, Yimin Yang1, Dabao Xu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical insufficiency (CI) with concomitant intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) is a common clinical phenomenon among CI patients. But there are neither published reports regarding the difference in diagnosis and treatment of such patients compared to those with CI only, nor any report about their prognosis. This study aimed to preliminary the alteration in diagnostic and curative aspects of these patients, so as to provide a certain reference for the clinical management of such conditions.
METHODS: Ten patients with CI combined with moderate to severe IUAs were diagnosed, treated and followed up at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from September 2017 to August 2019, their medical records and the pregnancy outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: All 10 patients had a previous history of typical painless cervical dilatation during the second trimester. All patients were moderate to severer IUAs, and the mean AFS score of IUAs was 9.80±1.08 (range, 8 to 12). Preoperatively, in 6 patients, the No. 7 Hegar dilator was able to pass through the internal cervical os before surgery without resistance. In the other 4 patients, the Hegar dilator could not be inserted before surgery due to the adhesions of the cervical canal and the lower uterine segment; the diagnoses of these patients were further confirmed at 3 months after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) when the No. 7 Hegar dilator was able to pass through the internal cervical os without resistance. There were 9 patients underwent pre-pregnancy laparoscopic cervical cerclage after HA. The remaining 1 patient exceptionally underwent laparoscopic cervical cerclage prior to HA, as the cervix was too loose to retain and be treated with an intrauterine device (IUD) or distended Foley's catheter balloon; which essentially prevent postoperative adhesion reformation. The patients were followed-up for 3 months to 2 years. The pregnancy rate was 60%, and the live birth rate was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CI and concomitant cervical or lower uterine segment IUAs, it is necessary to separate the adhesion prior to evaluating the cervical competency with the No. 7 Hegar dilator, to confirm the diagnosis. However, when the cervix is too loose, laparoscopic cervical cerclage is exceptionally carried out first and then IUAs is treated. Pre-pregnancy laparoscopic cervical cerclage has a good prognosis in patients with CI complicated by moderate to severe IUAs. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical incompetence (CI); diagnosis; intrauterine adhesions (IUAs); laparoscopic cervical cerclage; live birth rate

Year:  2020        PMID: 32175348      PMCID: PMC7049037          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Prevention and treatment of intra-uterine synechiae: Review of the literature].

Authors:  S Warembourg; S Huberlant; X Garric; S Leprince; R de Tayrac; V Letouzey
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2014-12-03

2.  Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  M J Novy; A Gupta; D D Wothe; S Gupta; K A Kennedy; M G Gravett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Estrogen therapy before hysteroscopic adhesiolysis improves the fertility outcome in patients with intrauterine adhesions.

Authors:  Luping Zhang; Ming Wang; Qi Zhang; Weihong Zhao; Baojun Yang; Hongyu Shang; Xiang Shang; Yuexiao Ma; Bangguo Wang; Limin Feng
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veena Zaveri; Fariba Aghajafari; Kofi Amankwah; Mary Hannah
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage.

Authors:  Richard Brown; Robert Gagnon; Marie-France Delisle
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2019-02

Review 7.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-06

8.  Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intrauterine adhesions after resectoscopic surgery.

Authors:  O Taskin; S Sadik; A Onoglu; R Gokdeniz; E Erturan; F Burak; J M Wheeler
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2000-08

9.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary preventions of preterm birth with cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Eyal Krispin; Shir Danieli-Gruber; Eran Hadar; Arie Gingold; Arnon Wiznitzer; Kinneret Tenenbaum-Gavish
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 10.  Transabdominal Cerclage.

Authors:  James E Sumners; Spencer G Kuper; Todd L Foster
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.190

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ceren Golbasi; Hakan Golbasi; Burak Bayraktar; Baris Sever; Tayfun Vural; Atalay Ekin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Management of concomitant cervical insufficiency and intrauterine adhesions.

Authors:  Zaneta Kimber-Trojnar
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.