Literature DB >> 31056734

Primary, secondary, and tertiary preventions of preterm birth with cervical cerclage.

Eyal Krispin1,2, Shir Danieli-Gruber3,4, Eran Hadar3,4, Arie Gingold3,4, Arnon Wiznitzer3,4, Kinneret Tenenbaum-Gavish3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of cerclage in preventing preterm birth according to indication. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all women who underwent cerclage to prevent preterm birth in a university-affiliated medical-center (2007-2017). Multiple gestations were excluded. Cohort was divided to three subgroups according to cerclage indication: group A-primary prevention cerclage, performed during the first trimester, based on a history of cervical insufficiency; group B-secondary prevention cerclage, performed after sonographic visualization of asymptomatic cervical length shortening and previous preterm birth; and group C-tertiary prevention cerclage, performed at mid-trimester in women presenting with asymptomatic cervical dilatation. Primary outcome was gestational age at delivery. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal complications.
RESULTS: During the study period 273 women underwent cervical cerclage: group A-215 (79%), group B-25 (9%), and group C-33 (12%). Patients in group C had significantly lower gravidity and parity. Gestational age at cerclage was highest in group C and lowest in group A (22 vs. 13 weeks p < 0.001). Median gestational age at delivery was 37 + 3 weeks in groups A and B and 34 + 3 in group C. This difference persisted after controlling for potential confounders (p  < 0.0001). Preterm birth prior to 34 weeks of gestation were 10.7% in group A, 16% in group B, and 33.33% in group C (p = 0.0021). Neonatal complications including: respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis, were clmore prevalent in group C.
CONCLUSION: Cerclage was shown to be an acceptable measure in cases of an anticipated increased risk of preterm birth with a low rate of procedure associated complications. However, the number-needed-to-treat cannot be determined from our data, because a control group was lacking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerclage; Cervical insufficiency; Preterm birth; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31056734     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05184-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mian Pan; Jun Zhang; Wenqiang Zhan; Xia Ouyang; Xiaoxiang Jiang; Danlin Yang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Management of an incompetent mid-second (mid-2nd) trimester absent ecto-cervix: a case series. Cervical amplification pre-cerclage insertion.

Authors:  T O Adedipe; A A Akintunde; U O Chukwujama
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes using cervical cerclage or conservative treatment in singleton gestations with a sonographic short cervix.

Authors:  Xiaoxiu Huang; Ruizhe Chen; Baohua Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ceren Golbasi; Hakan Golbasi; Burak Bayraktar; Baris Sever; Tayfun Vural; Atalay Ekin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Diagnosis and treatment of cervical incompetence combined with intrauterine adhesions.

Authors:  Waixing Li; Yueran Li; Xingping Zhao; Chunxia Cheng; Arvind Burjoo; Yimin Yang; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.