Literature DB >> 32173020

Quantitative Assessment of Intracanal Regenerated Tissues after Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Mature Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Noha Mohamed El-Kateb1, Rania Noaman El-Backly2, Wessam Mohamed Amin3, Amr Mohamed Abdalla2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The present study quantitatively assessed tissue regeneration after regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) with 2 different apical preparation sizes in mature teeth using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Eighteen maxillary anterior mature necrotic teeth with periapical lesions were selected for the study. The teeth were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Canal preparation was performed using Protaper Next files (Dentsply Sirona, York, PA) until size X3 and X5 in the test and control groups, respectively. REPs were performed, and Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) was used as the cervical plug material. In both groups, MRI was used to measure the signal intensity (SI) of the regenerated tissue at 3, 6, and 12 months at both the middle and the apical thirds of the canal. The SI between the normal contralateral teeth and each successive interval was compared. Clinical examination, sensibility tests, and digital periapical radiographs were also performed at successive time intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and Cochran test. The level of significance was set at P ≤ .05.
RESULTS: All 18 teeth were symptom free with healing of the periapical lesions. Regarding the SI measurements, there was no statistically significant difference between the SI of the normal contralateral teeth and that of the regenerated tissues in the treated teeth after a 12-month follow-up. In both groups, more than 60% of the cases regained pulp sensibility after 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Vital pulplike tissue could be successfully regenerated in mature teeth using REPs, which was not significantly affected by the size of the apical diameter. MRI could successfully assess this tissue in a quantitative, noninvasive manner.
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; mature teeth; necrotic teeth; regenerative endodontic procedures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32173020     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  5 in total

1.  Success Rate of Growth Factors for Existing Periapical Lesions in Failed Endodontically Treated Teeth in Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Izaz Shaik; Bhavyasri Gaddam; Anjali Patel; Rashmi Deshmukh; Manasa Bhavana; Mohana S M Sunku; Anusha Minnikanti
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

2.  Influence of periapical lesion size on healing outcome following regenerative endodontic procedures: a clinical investigation.

Authors:  Noha Mohamed El Kateb; Mahmoud Mostafa Fata
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Biomaterial scaffolds for clinical procedures in endodontic regeneration.

Authors:  He Liu; Jing Lu; Qianzhou Jiang; Markus Haapasalo; Junrong Qian; Franklin R Tay; Ya Shen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 4.  Regenerative Endodontics and Minimally Invasive Dentistry: Intertwining Paths Crossing Over Into Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Hisham Elnawam; Menatallah Abdelmougod; Ahmed Mobarak; Mai Hussein; Hamdy Aboualmakarem; Michael Girgis; Rania El Backly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 5.  Treatment outcome of regenerative endodontic procedures in mature permanent teeth compared to nonsurgical endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Divya Nangia; Aakriti Saini; Sidhartha Sharma; Vijay Kumar; Amrita Chawla; Vanamail Perumal; Ajay Logani
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.