Literature DB >> 32171914

Validation of a fully automated liver segmentation algorithm using multi-scale deep reinforcement learning and comparison versus manual segmentation.

David J Winkel1, Thomas J Weikert2, Hanns-Christian Breit2, Guillaume Chabin3, Eli Gibson3, Tobias J Heye2, Dorin Comaniciu3, Daniel T Boll2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) based software solution tested on liver volumetric analyses and to compare the results to the manual contour segmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively obtained 462 multiphasic CT datasets with six series for each patient: three different contrast phases and two slice thickness reconstructions (1.5/5 mm), totaling 2772 series. AI-based liver volumes were determined using multi-scale deep-reinforcement learning for 3D body markers detection and 3D structure segmentation. The algorithm was trained for liver volumetry on approximately 5000 datasets. We computed the absolute error of each automatically- and manually-derived volume relative to the mean manual volume. The mean processing time/dataset and method was recorded. Variations of liver volumes were compared using univariate generalized linear model analyses. A subgroup of 60 datasets was manually segmented by three radiologists, with a further subgroup of 20 segmented three times by each, to compare the automatically-derived results with the ground-truth.
RESULTS: The mean absolute error of the automatically-derived measurement was 44.3 mL (representing 2.37 % of the averaged liver volumes). The liver volume was neither dependent on the contrast phase (p = 0.697), nor on the slice thickness (p = 0.446). The mean processing time/dataset with the algorithm was 9.94 s (sec) compared to manual segmentation with 219.34 s. We found an excellent agreement between both approaches with an ICC value of 0.996.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrate that AI-powered fully automated liver volumetric analyses can be done with excellent accuracy, reproducibility, robustness, speed and agreement with the manual segmentation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Liver; Reproducibility of results; Tomography; X-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32171914     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

Review 1.  The overview of the deep learning integrated into the medical imaging of liver: a review.

Authors:  Kailai Xiang; Baihui Jiang; Dong Shang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Deep Reinforcement Learning with Automated Label Extraction from Clinical Reports Accurately Classifies 3D MRI Brain Volumes.

Authors:  Joseph Nathaniel Stember; Hrithwik Shalu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.

Authors:  Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence in hepatology, liver surgery and transplantation: Emerging applications and frontiers of research.

Authors:  Fadl H Veerankutty; Govind Jayan; Manish Kumar Yadav; Krishnan Sarojam Manoj; Abhishek Yadav; Sindhu Radha Sadasivan Nair; T U Shabeerali; Varghese Yeldho; Madhu Sasidharan; Shiraz Ahmad Rather
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

5.  Fully automated segmentation in temporal bone CT with neural network: a preliminary assessment study.

Authors:  Jiang Wang; Yi Lv; Junchen Wang; Furong Ma; Yali Du; Xin Fan; Menglin Wang; Jia Ke
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 6.  Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Imaging of Spinal Metastasis.

Authors:  Wilson Ong; Lei Zhu; Wenqiao Zhang; Tricia Kuah; Desmond Shi Wei Lim; Xi Zhen Low; Yee Liang Thian; Ee Chin Teo; Jiong Hao Tan; Naresh Kumar; Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Beng Chin Ooi; Swee Tian Quek; Andrew Makmur; James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Fully automated preoperative liver volumetry incorporating the anatomical location of the central hepatic vein.

Authors:  Sven Koitka; Phillip Gudlin; Jens M Theysohn; Arzu Oezcelik; Dieter P Hoyer; Murat Dayangac; René Hosch; Johannes Haubold; Nils Flaschel; Felix Nensa; Eugen Malamutmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Automated Detection of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions on CT Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Lorraine Abel; Jakob Wasserthal; Thomas Weikert; Alexander W Sauter; Ivan Nesic; Marko Obradovic; Shan Yang; Sebastian Manneck; Carl Glessgen; Johanna M Ospel; Bram Stieltjes; Daniel T Boll; Björn Friebe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Fully automated whole-liver volume quantification on CT-image data: Comparison with manual volumetry using enhanced and unenhanced images as well as two different radiation dose levels and two reconstruction kernels.

Authors:  Florian Hagen; Antonia Mair; Michael Bitzer; Hans Bösmüller; Marius Horger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.