Literature DB >> 32170039

The risk of misdiagnosis in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a review of current guidelines.

M Yousuf Salmasi1, Nina Al-Saadi2, Philip Hartley2, Omar A Jarral2, Shahzad Raja3, Muthana Hussein4, Julian Redhead5, Ulrich Rosendahl3, Christoph A Nienaber6, John R Pepper3, Aung Y Oo7, Thanos Athanasiou2.   

Abstract

Acute aortic syndrome and in particular aortic dissection (AAD) persists as a cause of significant morbidity and mortality despite improvements in surgical management. This clinical review aims to explore the risks of misdiagnosis, outcomes associated with misdiagnosis and evaluate current diagnostic methods for reducing its incidence.Due to the nature of the pathology, misdiagnosing the condition and delaying management can dramatically worsen patient outcomes. Several diagnostic challenges exist, including low prevalence, rapidly propagating pathology, non-discrete symptomatology, non-specific signs, analogy with other acute conditions and lack of management infrastructure. A similarity to acute coronary syndromes is a specific concern and risks patient maltreatment. AAD with malperfusion syndromes are both a cause of misdiagnosis and marker of disease complication, requiring specifically tailored management plans from the emergency setting.Despite improvements in diagnostic measures, including imaging modalities and biomarkers, misdiagnosis of AAD remains commonplace and current guidelines are relatively limited in preventing its occurrence. This paper recommends the early use of AAD risk scoring, focused echocardiography and most importantly, fast-tracking patients to cross-sectional imaging where the suspicion of AAD is high. This has the potential to improve the diagnostic process for AAD and limit the risk of misdiagnosis. However, our understanding remains limited by the lack of large patient datasets and an adequately audited processes of emergency department practice. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic dissection or intramural hematoma; cardiac computer tomographic (CT) imaging; cardiac imaging and diagnostics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32170039     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  4 in total

1.  Exaggerated Autophagy in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Transcriptome Pilot Analysis of Human Ascending Aortic Tissues.

Authors:  Zeyi Zhou; Yan Liu; Xiyu Zhu; Xinlong Tang; Yali Wang; Junxia Wang; Can Xu; Dongjin Wang; Jie Du; Qing Zhou
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  The association between lymphocyte-monocyte ratio and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Xinwei Mu; Cui Zhang; Wenxiu Chen; Xiaochun Song; Liang Hong; Huan Xu; Yan Qian; Wenhao Zhang; Jiakui Sun; Xiao Shen; Ying Liu; Xiang Wang; Qiankun Shi; Han Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Misdiagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Emergencies Occurs Frequently Among Transfers to Aortic Referral Centers: An Analysis of Over 3700 Patients.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Takuya Ogami; Edgar Aranda-Michel; Yancheng Dai; Reed Holmes; Thomas M Beaver; Derek Serna-Gallegos; Tomas D Martin; Forozan Navid; Sarah Yousef; Ibrahim Sultan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.106

4.  C/EBPα-Mediated Transcriptional Activation of PIK3C2A Regulates Autophagy, Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression, and Phenotypic of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Heng Lu; Yi Chen; Yinhai Chen; Lingchen Huang; Liangwan Chen
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.493

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.