Literature DB >> 32169382

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: No Evidence for Superior Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Direct Anterior Approach at 1.5 Months Postoperatively, and Through a 5-Year Follow-Up.

Nicholas Sauder1, Veronique Vestergaard2, Saira Siddiqui3, Vincent P Galea1, Charles R Bragdon4, Henrik Malchau5, Karim A Elsharkawy3, James I Huddleston6, Roger H Emerson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) may result in superior early postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study compared PROMs between THA patients treated with the direct anterior or posterolateral approach between 1.5 months and 5 years, using literature-derived patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) thresholds.
METHODS: A propensity score match of 93 direct anterior patients to 93 posterolateral patients from a multicenter US collaboration (6 centers, 398 patients) was performed. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Short-Form 36, and a Numerical Rating Scale for Pain were collected preoperatively, postoperatively (mean days: 47), and at 1, 3, and 5 years. The proportion of patients reaching the HHS PASS, Pain MCII, and Function MCII in the direct anterior and posterolateral groups was compared using binary logistic regressions, controlling for age, gender, body mass index, and Charnley score.
RESULTS: Direct anterior patients were less likely to reach the HHS PASS at the postoperative visit (P = .015; odds ratio = 0.454), but not at later visits (P > .082). Direct anterior patients had no difference from posterolateral patients in their tendency to reach the Pain MCII postoperatively or at 1 year (P > .090). The direct anterior patients were less likely to reach the Function MCII at the postoperative visit (P = .011; odds ratio = 0.422), but not at 1 year (P = .958).
CONCLUSION: No evidence was found of superior early postoperative PROM scores in THA patients treated with the direct anterior approach. No PROM differences were found at or beyond 1 year, indicating that patients reach similar final symptom states, regardless of surgical approach.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct anterior; patient-reported outcome measures; posterolateral; surgical approach; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32169382     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Rapid Discharge in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Utility of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Tool in Predicting Same-Day and Next-Day Discharge.

Authors:  Kelvin Y Kim; James E Feng; Afshin A Anoushiravani; Edward Dranoff; Roy I Davidovitch; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Position Statement on Outpatient Joint Replacement.

Authors:  R Meneghini; Wilford Gibson; David Halsey; Douglas Padgett; Keith Berend; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty-Patient Selection: Update on the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Score.

Authors:  Mary Ziemba-Davis; Peter Caccavallo; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Patient Perceptions Regarding Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Mary Ziemba-Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Identifiable Risk Factors to Minimize Postoperative Urinary Retention in Modern Outpatient Rapid Recovery Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mary Ziemba-Davis; Mark Nielson; Kent Kraus; Nathan Duncan; Nimra Nayyar; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Can Total Knee Arthroplasty Be Performed Safely as an Outpatient in the Medicare Population?

Authors:  P Maxwell Courtney; Mark I Froimson; R Michael Meneghini; Gwo-Chin Lee; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?

Authors:  Mick P Kelly; Tyler E Calkins; Chris Culvern; Monica Kogan; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Novel Coronavirus COVID-19: Current Evidence and Evolving Strategies.

Authors:  Christopher Vannabouathong; Tahira Devji; Seper Ekhtiari; Yaping Chang; Steven A Phillips; Meng Zhu; Zain Chagla; Cheryl Main; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Guidelines for Ambulatory Surgery Centers for the Care of Surgically Necessary/Time-Sensitive Orthopaedic Cases During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nicholas N DePhillipo; Christopher M Larson; Owen R O'Neill; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.558

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis.

Authors:  M Lane Moore; Joseph C Brinkman; Jordan R Pollock; David G Deckey; Justin L Makovicka; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-21

2.  Good long-term outcomes for Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty in South Africa.

Authors:  Jurek Rafal Tomasz Pietrzak; Zia Maharaj; Josip Nenad Cakic
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-28

Review 3.  The direct anterior approach to the hip: a useful tool in experienced hands or just another approach?

Authors:  John Realyvasquez; Vivek Singh; Akash K Shah; Dionisio Ortiz; Joseph X Robin; Andrew Brash; Mark Kurapatti; Roy I Davidovitch; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-01-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.