BACKGROUND: Although occupational exposure to animals has been associated with lymphohematopoietic malignancies, to our knowledge no studies have evaluated adult cancer risks associated with living near intensive animal agriculture. METHODS: We linked participants in the prospective Agricultural Health Study to permitted animal feeding operations in Iowa. We created metrics reflecting the intensity of animal exposures within 2 and 5 km of participants' residences, enumerating both total and inverse distance-weighted animal units (AUs), standardized by animal size and manure production. We estimated risk of lymphohematopoietic malignancies and subtypes [hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI)], adjusting for demographic and farming-related factors, including occupational pesticide exposure. We stratified associations by animal type and animal-related work activities. RESULTS: We observed 519 cases (1993-2015) among 32,635 pesticide applicators and 211 cases among 19,743 spouses. Among applicators, no associations were evident within 2 km, but risk of any lymphohematopoietic cancer was elevated across quintiles of weighted AUs within 5 km. Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was elevated for the second (HR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.1), third (HR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.2), and fourth (HR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3, 2.4) highest quintiles of weighted AUs within 5 km (Ptrend = 0.52) and increased with dairy cattle AUs (Ptrend = 0.04). We found positive trends for leukemia and some NHL subtypes with increasing numbers of both beef and dairy cattle. Risks did not vary by animal-related work (Pinteraction = 0.61). Associations were similar using the total exposure metric and inconsistent among spouses. CONCLUSION: Residential proximity to intensive animal agriculture was positively associated with risk of NHL and leukemia, even after consideration of occupational animal and pesticide exposures.
BACKGROUND: Although occupational exposure to animals has been associated with lymphohematopoietic malignancies, to our knowledge no studies have evaluated adult cancer risks associated with living near intensive animal agriculture. METHODS: We linked participants in the prospective Agricultural Health Study to permitted animal feeding operations in Iowa. We created metrics reflecting the intensity of animal exposures within 2 and 5 km of participants' residences, enumerating both total and inverse distance-weighted animal units (AUs), standardized by animal size and manure production. We estimated risk of lymphohematopoietic malignancies and subtypes [hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI)], adjusting for demographic and farming-related factors, including occupational pesticide exposure. We stratified associations by animal type and animal-related work activities. RESULTS: We observed 519 cases (1993-2015) among 32,635 pesticide applicators and 211 cases among 19,743 spouses. Among applicators, no associations were evident within 2 km, but risk of any lymphohematopoietic cancer was elevated across quintiles of weighted AUs within 5 km. Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was elevated for the second (HR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.1), third (HR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.2), and fourth (HR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3, 2.4) highest quintiles of weighted AUs within 5 km (Ptrend = 0.52) and increased with dairy cattle AUs (Ptrend = 0.04). We found positive trends for leukemia and some NHL subtypes with increasing numbers of both beef and dairy cattle. Risks did not vary by animal-related work (Pinteraction = 0.61). Associations were similar using the total exposure metric and inconsistent among spouses. CONCLUSION: Residential proximity to intensive animal agriculture was positively associated with risk of NHL and leukemia, even after consideration of occupational animal and pesticide exposures.
Authors: H H McDuffie; P Pahwa; J J Spinelli; J R McLaughlin; S Fincham; D Robson; J A Dosman; J Hu Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Steven J Hoff; Dwaine S Bundy; Minda A Nelson; Brian C Zelle; Larry D Jacobson; Albert J Heber; Jinqin Ni; Yuanhui Zhang; Jacek A Koziel; David B Beasley Journal: J Air Waste Manag Assoc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.235
Authors: Dick Heederik; Torben Sigsgaard; Peter S Thorne; Joel N Kline; Rachel Avery; Jakob H Bønløkke; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; James A Dosman; Caroline Duchaine; Steven R Kirkhorn; Katarina Kulhankova; James A Merchant Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ji-Young Son; Rebecca L Muenich; Danica Schaffer-Smith; Marie Lynn Miranda; Michelle L Bell Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Jared A Fisher; Maya Spaur; Ian D Buller; Abigail R Flory; Laura E Beane Freeman; Jonathan N Hofmann; Michael Giangrande; Rena R Jones; Mary H Ward Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ian D Buller; Derek W Brown; Rena R Jones; Mitchell J Machiela; Timothy A Myers Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 3.918