Literature DB >> 32166638

The influence of a swab type on the results of point-of-care tests.

Aleksandra Anna Zasada1, Katarzyna Zacharczuk2, Katarzyna Woźnica3, Małgorzata Główka3, Robert Ziółkowski4, Elżbieta Malinowska4,5.   

Abstract

Most point-of-care tests (POCT) use swabs for sampling and/or for applying a sample on the test. A variety of swabs differing in tip materials is commercially available. Different tip materials have different chemical and physical characteristics which might influence the specimen collection and release. We investigated properties of various types of swabs used in clinical diagnostics with focusing on two kinds of analytes, DNA and proteins, which are most often used targets in POCT. As the model samples we used diphtheria toxoid NIBSC 69/017 for investigating recovery of protein analytes such as antigens and bacterial strains of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, diphtheria toxin-producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae NCTC 10648, and the clinical isolate nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae 5820/15 for investigating the recovery of nucleic acids. We investigated four types of swabs most commonly used in clinical diagnostics in terms of absorption capacity and efficiency of release of nucleic acids and proteins. Volume uptake was measured in milligrams. For DNA release various washing out buffers were used and the amount of released DNA was measured spectrophotometrically. The amount of protein released from the swabs were examined using the Lowry assay. We observed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean weights of absorbed liquid, in the DNA recovery and protein recovery by the four variety of swab examined. However, the efficiency of DNA and protein release was not correlated to the absorbed volume of a sample, but rather to the properties of swabs. The swab composition and structure can have a significant impact on the collection and release efficiency of a sample. Therefore, validation of POCT in relation to the used swabs for sampling is really important. The use of inappropriate swabs could lead to false negative or misleading analysis results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical diagnostics; POCT; Sample collection; Swabs

Year:  2020        PMID: 32166638     DOI: 10.1186/s13568-020-00978-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMB Express        ISSN: 2191-0855            Impact factor:   3.298


  7 in total

1.  Accessioning and automation compatible anterior nares swab design.

Authors:  Mary E Pettit; Sarah A Boswell; Jason Qian; Richard Novak; Michael Springer
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 2.  A review of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection: Disease timelines, relative sensitivities, and test optimization.

Authors:  Marylin Roque; Kevin Proudfoot; Vadim Mathys; Sophie Yu; Natalie Krieger; Thomas Gernon; Kash Gokli; Stanley Hamilton; Colin Cook; Yuman Fong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.885

3.  In Vitro Nasal Tissue Model for the Validation of Nasopharyngeal and Midturbinate Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.

Authors:  Devon R Hartigan; Miryam Adelfio; Molly E Shutt; Stephanie M Jones; Shreya Patel; Joshua T Marchand; Pamela D McGuinness; Bryan O Buchholz; Chiara E Ghezzi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 4.  COVID-19: A challenge for electrochemical biosensors.

Authors:  Jiri Kudr; Petr Michalek; Lada Ilieva; Vojtech Adam; Ondrej Zitka
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 14.908

5.  The Use of Flocked Swabs with a Protective Medium Increases the Recovery of Live Brucella spp. and DNA Detection.

Authors:  Luca Freddi; Vitomir Djokic; Fathia Petot-Bottin; Guillaume Girault; Ludivine Perrot; Acacia Ferreira Vicente; Claire Ponsart
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-17

Review 6.  SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostics Based on Nucleic Acids Amplification: From Fundamental Concepts to Applications and Beyond.

Authors:  João M Vindeirinho; Eva Pinho; Nuno F Azevedo; Carina Almeida
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Development of a Microneedle Swab for Acquisition of Genomic DNA From Buccal Cells.

Authors:  Yun-Seo Kim; JeongHyeon Kim; Woonsung Na; Gil-Hwan Sung; Seung-Ki Baek; Yun Kyoung Kim; Gyeong Ryeong Kim; Hae-Jin Hu; Jung-Hwan Park
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.