Lola Jacquemont1,2, Gaëlle Tilly1,2, Michelle Yap1,2, Tra-My Doan-Ngoc1,2, Richard Danger1,2, Pierrick Guérif2, Florent Delbos3, Bernard Martinet1,2, Magali Giral1,2, Yohann Foucher4, Sophie Brouard1,2, Nicolas Degauque5,2. 1. Université de Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie (CRTI), UMR 1064, Nantes, France. 2. CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, ITUN, Nantes, France. 3. Etablissement Français du Sang, Nantes, France; and. 4. INSERM, Université de Nantes, methodS in Patient-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch (SPHERE), UMR1246, Nantes, France. 5. Université de Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie (CRTI), UMR 1064, Nantes, France; nicolas.degauque@univ-nantes.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying biomarkers to predict kidney transplant failure and to define new therapeutic targets requires more comprehensive understanding of the immune response to chronic allogeneic stimulation. METHODS: We investigated the frequency and function of CD8+ T cell subsets-including effector memory (EM) and terminally differentiated EM (TEMRA) CD8+ T cells-in blood samples from 284 kidney transplant recipients recruited 1 year post-transplant and followed for a median of 8.3 years. We also analyzed CD8+ T cell reactivity to donor-specific PBMCs in 24 patients who had received living-donor kidney transplants. RESULTS: Increased frequency of circulating TEMRA CD8+ T cells at 1 year post-transplant associated with increased risk of graft failure during follow-up. This association remained after adjustment for a previously reported composite of eight clinical variables, the Kidney Transplant Failure Score. In contrast, increased frequency of EM CD8+ T cells associated with reduced risk of graft failure. A distinct TEMRA CD8+ T cell subpopulation was identified that was characterized by expression of FcγRIIIA (CD16) and by high levels of proinflammatory cytokine secretion and cytotoxic activity. Although donor-specific stimulation induced a similar rapid, early response in EM and TEMRA CD8+ T cells, CD16 engagement resulted in selective activation of TEMRA CD8+ T cells, which mediated antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year post-transplant, the composition of memory CD8+ T cell subsets in blood improved prediction of 8-year kidney transplant failure compared with a clinical-variables score alone. A subpopulation of TEMRA CD8+ T cells displays a novel dual mechanism of activation mediated by engagement of the T-cell receptor or of CD16. These findings suggest that TEMRA CD8+ T cells play a pivotal role in humoral and cellular rejection and reveal the potential value of memory CD8+ T cell monitoring for predicting risk of kidney transplant failure.
BACKGROUND: Identifying biomarkers to predict kidney transplant failure and to define new therapeutic targets requires more comprehensive understanding of the immune response to chronic allogeneic stimulation. METHODS: We investigated the frequency and function of CD8+ T cell subsets-including effector memory (EM) and terminally differentiated EM (TEMRA) CD8+ T cells-in blood samples from 284 kidney transplant recipients recruited 1 year post-transplant and followed for a median of 8.3 years. We also analyzed CD8+ T cell reactivity to donor-specific PBMCs in 24 patients who had received living-donor kidney transplants. RESULTS: Increased frequency of circulating TEMRA CD8+ T cells at 1 year post-transplant associated with increased risk of graft failure during follow-up. This association remained after adjustment for a previously reported composite of eight clinical variables, the Kidney Transplant Failure Score. In contrast, increased frequency of EM CD8+ T cells associated with reduced risk of graft failure. A distinct TEMRA CD8+ T cell subpopulation was identified that was characterized by expression of FcγRIIIA (CD16) and by high levels of proinflammatory cytokine secretion and cytotoxic activity. Although donor-specific stimulation induced a similar rapid, early response in EM and TEMRA CD8+ T cells, CD16 engagement resulted in selective activation of TEMRA CD8+ T cells, which mediated antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year post-transplant, the composition of memory CD8+ T cell subsets in blood improved prediction of 8-year kidney transplant failure compared with a clinical-variables score alone. A subpopulation of TEMRA CD8+ T cells displays a novel dual mechanism of activation mediated by engagement of the T-cell receptor or of CD16. These findings suggest that TEMRA CD8+ T cells play a pivotal role in humoral and cellular rejection and reveal the potential value of memory CD8+ T cell monitoring for predicting risk of kidney transplant failure.
Authors: Bertram Bengsch; Takuya Ohtani; Omar Khan; Manu Setty; Sasikanth Manne; Shaun O'Brien; Pier Federico Gherardini; Ramin Sedaghat Herati; Alexander C Huang; Kyong-Mi Chang; Evan W Newell; Niels Bovenschen; Dana Pe'er; Steven M Albelda; E John Wherry Journal: Immunity Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Emilio D Poggio; Michael Clemente; Jocelyn Riley; Meagan Roddy; Neil S Greenspan; Cora Dejelo; Nader Najafian; Mohamed H Sayegh; Donald E Hricik; Peter S Heeger Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Antoine Néel; Marie Bucchia; Mélanie Néel; Gaelle Tilly; Aurélie Caristan; Michele Yap; Marie Rimbert; Sarah Bruneau; Marion Cadoux; Christian Agard; Maryvonne Hourmant; Pascal Godmer; Sophie Brouard; Céline Bressollette; Mohamed Hamidou; Regis Josien; Fadi Fakhouri; Nicolas Degauque Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Candice Roufosse; Naomi Simmonds; Marian Clahsen-van Groningen; Mark Haas; Kammi J Henriksen; Catherine Horsfield; Alexandre Loupy; Michael Mengel; Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasińska; Marion Rabant; Lorraine C Racusen; Kim Solez; Jan U Becker Journal: Transplantation Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Elisabet Van Loon; Baptiste Lamarthée; Thomas Barba; Sandra Claes; Maarten Coemans; Henriette de Loor; Marie-Paule Emonds; Priyanka Koshy; Dirk Kuypers; Paul Proost; Aleksandar Senev; Ben Sprangers; Claire Tinel; Olivier Thaunat; Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck; Dominique Schols; Maarten Naesens Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Miguel Galán; Lorena Vigón; Daniel Fuertes; María Aránzazu Murciano-Antón; Guiomar Casado-Fernández; Susana Domínguez-Mateos; Elena Mateos; Fernando Ramos-Martín; Vicente Planelles; Montserrat Torres; Sara Rodríguez-Mora; María Rosa López-Huertas; Mayte Coiras Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Ahto Salumets; Liina Tserel; Anna P Rumm; Lehte Türk; Külli Kingo; Kai Saks; Astrid Oras; Raivo Uibo; Riin Tamm; Hedi Peterson; Kai Kisand; Pärt Peterson Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 11.005
Authors: Xingqiang Lai; Xin Zheng; James M Mathew; Lorenzo Gallon; Joseph R Leventhal; Zheng Jenny Zhang Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 7.561