Literature DB >> 32164822

Methods for Evaluating Causality in Observational Studies.

Emilio A L Gianicolo1, Martin Eichler, Oliver Muensterer, Konstantin Strauch, Maria Blettner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical medical research, causality is demonstrated b controlled trials (RCTs). Often, however, an RCT cannot be conducted for ethical reasons, and sometimes for practical reasons as well. In such cases, knowledge can be derived from an observational study instead. In this article, we present two methods that have not been widely used in medical research to date.
METHODS: The methods of assessing causal inferences in observational studies are described on the basis of publications retrieved by a selective literature search.
RESULTS: Two relatively new approaches-regression-discontinuity methods and interrupted time series-can be used to demonstrate a causal relationship under certain circumstances. The regression-discontinuity design is a quasi-experimental approach that can be applied if a continuous assignment variable is used with a threshold value. Patients are assigned to different treatment schemes on the basis of the threshold value. For assignment variables that are subject to random measurement error, it is assumed that, in a small interval around a threshold value, e.g., cholesterol values of 160 mg/dL, subjects are assigned essentially at random to one of two treatment groups. If patients with a value above the threshold are given a certain treatment, those with values below the threshold can serve as control group. Interrupted time series are a special type of regression-discontinuity design in which time is the assignment variable, and the threshold is a cutoff point. This is often an external event, such as the imposition of a smoking ban. A before-and-after comparison can be used to determine the effect of the intervention (e.g., the smoking ban) on health parameters such as the frequency of cardiovascular disease.
CONCLUSION: The approaches described here can be used to derive causal inferences ies. They should only be applied after the prerequisites for their use have been carefully checked.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32164822     DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  9 in total

1.  Periodontal outcomes of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Z Drumond; A A Andrade; J A A de Arruda; R A Mesquita; L G Abreu
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  COVID-19 Lockdown in Israel: The Environmental Effect on Ultrafine Particle Content in the Airway.

Authors:  Einat Fireman Klein; Yotam Elimeleh; Yochai Adir; Lana Majdoub; Michal Shteinberg; Aharon Kessel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Collider Bias in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Thaddäus Tönnies; Sabine Kahl; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.251

4.  Ongoing challenges in unravelling the association between COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Matteo Foschi; Lucio D'Anna; Ahmed Abdelhak; Benjamin Mayer; Hayrettin Tumani; Markus Otto; Samir Abu-Rumeileh
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Comment on "Abuse and Misuse of Pregabalin and Gabapentin: A Systematic Review Update".

Authors:  Udo Bonnet; Heath McAnally; Norbert Scherbaum
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Case Report: Plasticity in Central Sensory Finger Representation and Touch Perception After Microsurgical Reconstruction of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Injury.

Authors:  Jennifer Ernst; Thomas Weiss; Nadine Wanke; Jens Frahm; Gunther Felmerer; Dario Farina; Arndt F Schilling; Meike A Wilke
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Nutrient patterns are associated with discordant apoB and LDL: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Mohsen Mazidi; Richard J Webb; Elena S George; Niloofar Shekoohi; Julie A Lovegrove; Ian G Davies
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.125

8.  Osteoarthritis, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction: A mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Huiqing Xu; Yuxiao Ling; Han Jiang; Yingjun Li; Minmin Jiang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-25

Review 9.  Evaluation of the Relationship between Left Coronary Artery Bifurcation Angle and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jade Geerlings-Batt; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.