| Literature DB >> 32164204 |
Anita Smailagić1, Petar Ristivojević2, Ivica Dimkić3, Tamara Pavlović3, Dragana Dabić Zagorac1, Sonja Veljović4, Milica Fotirić Akšić5, Mekjell Meland6, Maja Natić2.
Abstract
The main focus of this study is to assess radical scavenging and antimicrobial activities of the 11 wood extracts: oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Q. robur L., and Q. cerris L.), mulberry (Morus alba L.), myrobalan plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), and wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) provided initial phenolic screening and revealed different chemical patterns among investigated wood extracts. To identify individual compounds with radical scavenging activity DPPH-HPTLC, assay was applied. Gallic acid, ferulic and/or caffeic acids were identified as the compounds with the highest contribution of total radical scavenging activity. Principal component analysis was applied on the data set obtained from HPTLC chromatogram to classify samples based on chemical fingerprints: Quercus spp. formed separate clusters from the other wood samples. The wood extracts were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against eight representative human and opportunistic pathogens. The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was recorded against Staphylococcus aureus for black locust, cherry and mulberry wood extracts. This work provided simple, low-cost and high-throughput screening of phenolic compounds and assessments of the radical scavenging properties of selected individual metabolites from natural matrix that contributed to scavenge free radicals.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH-HPTLC assay; antimicrobial activity; phenolic profile; planar chromatography; wood waste
Year: 2020 PMID: 32164204 PMCID: PMC7143368 DOI: 10.3390/foods9030319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Selected wood waste extracts of different forest trees for DPPH-HPTLC (high-performance thin-layer chromatography) and antimicrobial testing assay.
| Sample No. | Tree | Geographical Origin | Extraction Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pedunculate oak— | Slavonija (Croatia) | 4.44 |
| 2 | Gornji Radan (Serbia) | 4.40 | |
| 3 | Olovo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | 4.12 | |
| 4 | Sessile oak— | Kučaj (Serbia) | 5.06 |
| 5 | Kuršumlija (Serbia) | 3.05 | |
| 6 | Ravna Gora (Serbia) | 4.58 | |
| 7 | Turkey oak— | Kuršumlija (Serbia) | 1.63 |
| 8 | Black locust— | Kraljevo (Serbia) | 6.37 |
| 9 | Myrobalan plum— | Vrnjačka Banja (Serbia) | 5.80 |
| 10 | Wild cherry— | Ravna Gora (Serbia) | 3.15 |
| 11 | Mulberry— | Vrnjačka Banja (Serbia) | 7.29 |
Indicator strains used in testing antimicrobial activity of selected extracts from forest trees.
| Indicator Strains | Isolate Code | Growth Medium | Growth Temperature | The Origin of The Isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| IBR S0001 | LA | 37 °C | Oral cavity * |
|
| IBR S0004 | ǁ | ||
| Methicillin-resistant | ATCC33591 | ǁ | Reference strains | |
|
| ATCC25923 | ǁ | ||
|
| ATCC25922 | ǁ | ||
|
| ATCC29212 | ǁ | ||
|
| ATCC19111 | BHA | ||
|
| ATCC10231 | TSA |
* Strains isolated from the human oral cavity [29]. All reference strains belong to Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade.
Figure 1Line profiles of investigated wood extracts based on HPTLC analysis: (A) oak samples (no. 1–7); (B) non-oak samples (no. 8–11): black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) (no. 8), myrobalan plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) (no. 9), wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) (no. 10) and mulberry (Morus alba L.) (no 11).
Figure 2HPTLC chromatograms of samples: Q. robur (no. 1–3), Q. petraea (no. 4–6), Q. cerris (no. 7), Robinia pseudoacacia (no. 8), Prunus cerasifera (no. 9), Prunus avium (no. 10), mulberry (no. 11) and four standard compounds (gallic acid (no. 12), ferulic acid (no. 13), caffeic acid (no. 14) and p-coumaric acid(no. 15)); (a) under UV light at 366 nm; (b) under UV light at 254 nm; (c) DPPH-HPTLC chromatogram.
Figure 3Principal component analysis (PCA) of HPTLC chromatogram: (A) The PC score plot; (B) and (C) The loading plots. 1–3 Pedunculate oaks (Quercus robur L.), 4–6—sessile oaks (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl), 7—Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.).
Figure 4Antimicrobial potential of wood waste extracts in well-diffusion method. *V/N—Vancomycin/Nystatin. Values within columns represent a mean of inhibition zones and expressed in mm. Q. robur (no. 1–3), Q. petraea (no. 4–6), Q. cerris (no. 7), Robinia pseudoacacia (no. 8), Prunus cerasifera (no. 9), Prunus avium (no. 10), mulberry (no. 11).
Minimum inhibitory, minimum bactericidal and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MIC/MBC/MFC) of 11 wood extracts towards selected human pathogens (mg mL−1).
| Indicator Strains/MIC (mg mL−1) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Str | Van | Nys |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.020 | 0.006 | NT |
|
| 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.001 | NT |
|
| 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.009 | 0.002 | NT |
| MRSA | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.02 | - | - | NT |
|
| 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.019 | 0.002 | NT |
|
| 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.75 | 1.50 | - | 0.75 | - | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.009 | 0.200 | NT |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.00 | 0.25 | - | NT | NT | 0.006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.050 | 0.150 | NT |
|
| 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.050 | 0.050 | NT |
|
| 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.025 | 0.003 | NT |
| MRSA | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.63 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.03 | - | - | NT |
|
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.025 | 0.006 | NT |
|
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.013 | 0.400 | NT |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.50 | - | NT | NT | 0.025 |
Str—Streptomycin; Van—Vancomycin; Nys—Nystatin; NT—not tested; (-)—not determined. Values are marked with lowest value (blue), middle value (yellow), and the highest value (red). Q. robur (no. 1–3), Q. petraea (no. 4–6), Q. cerris (no. 7), Robinia pseudoacacia (no. 8), Prunus cerasifera (no. 9), Prunus avium (no. 10), mulberry (no. 11).
Summarized MICs values for other waste extracts obtained from literature data.
| Bark Extracts Origin MIC (mg mL−1) |
| Mr |
|
|
|
|
| References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.13 | - | 0.16 | - | - | 0.08 | 0.97 | [ |
|
| 0.21 | - | 0.15 | - | - | 0.33 | 0.60 | |
|
| 0.23 | - | 0.27 | - | - | 0.17 | 0.40 | [ |
|
| 0.22 | - | 0.29 | - | - | 0.13 | 0.34 | |
|
| 0.23 | - | 0.25 | - | - | 0.10 | 0.31 | |
|
| 0.08 | - | - | - | - | 0.08 | - | [ |
|
| 0.13 | - | - | - | 0.51 | 0.26 | - | [ |
|
| - | 1.25 | - | - | - | - | - | [ |
|
| - | - | - | 0.08 | - | - | - | [ |
|
| 0.07 | 0.16 | - | - | - | - | - | [ |
|
| 6.25 | - | - | - | - | 12.50 | - | [ |
|
| 5.00 | 1.00 | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | [ |
|
| 0.16 | - | - | - | - | 0.04 | 0.16 | [ |
Sa—S. aureus; Mr—MRSA; Lm—L. monocytogenes; Sm—S. mutans; Sp—S. pyogenes; Ec—E. coli; Ca—C. albicans; (-)—not tested.