Ciara C O'Sullivan1,2, Sheeba Irshad1,3, Zheyu Wang1, Zhuojun Tang1, Christopher Umbricht1, Gary L Rosner1, Mindy S Christianson1, Vered Stearns1, Karen Lisa Smith4,5. 1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Guy's Cancer, Cancer and Pharmaceutical Division, King's College London, London, UK. 4. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. ksmith60@jhmi.edu. 5. Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Sibley Memorial Hospital, 5255 Loughboro Road, NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA. ksmith60@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer during pregnancy (BC-P) or the first year post-partum (BC-PP) is rare and whether it differs from breast cancer (BC) in young women not associated with pregnancy is uncertain. METHODS: We queried our institutional database for BC-P and BC-PP cases and matched controls with BC not associated with pregnancy diagnosed between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2013. We performed two parallel retrospective cohort studies evaluating clinico-pathologic features, treatment and outcomes for BC-P and BC-PP cases compared to their controls. RESULTS: In our population of 65 BC-P cases, 135 controls for BC-P cases, 75 BC-PP cases and 145 controls for BC-PP cases, high grade and estrogen receptor-negativity were more frequent in both case groups than their controls. Among those with stage I-III BC, patterns of local therapy were similar for both case groups and their controls, with the majority undergoing surgery and radiation. Over three-fourths of those with stage I-III BC received chemotherapy. BC-P cases tolerated chemotherapy well, with the majority receiving doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks. On multivariate analyses of those with stage I-III BC, BC-P cases had non-significantly higher hazards of recurrence and death compared to their controls, while BC-PP cases had non-significantly lower hazards of recurrence and death compared to their controls. CONCLUSION: BC-P and BC-PP were associated with adverse clinic-pathologic features in our population. However, we did not observe inferior outcomes for BC-P or BC-PP compared to controls, likely due to receipt of aggressive multi-modality therapy.
PURPOSE:Breast cancer during pregnancy (BC-P) or the first year post-partum (BC-PP) is rare and whether it differs from breast cancer (BC) in young women not associated with pregnancy is uncertain. METHODS: We queried our institutional database for BC-P and BC-PP cases and matched controls with BC not associated with pregnancy diagnosed between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2013. We performed two parallel retrospective cohort studies evaluating clinico-pathologic features, treatment and outcomes for BC-P and BC-PP cases compared to their controls. RESULTS: In our population of 65 BC-P cases, 135 controls for BC-P cases, 75 BC-PP cases and 145 controls for BC-PP cases, high grade and estrogen receptor-negativity were more frequent in both case groups than their controls. Among those with stage I-III BC, patterns of local therapy were similar for both case groups and their controls, with the majority undergoing surgery and radiation. Over three-fourths of those with stage I-III BC received chemotherapy. BC-P cases tolerated chemotherapy well, with the majority receiving doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks. On multivariate analyses of those with stage I-III BC, BC-P cases had non-significantly higher hazards of recurrence and death compared to their controls, while BC-PP cases had non-significantly lower hazards of recurrence and death compared to their controls. CONCLUSION:BC-P and BC-PP were associated with adverse clinic-pathologic features in our population. However, we did not observe inferior outcomes for BC-P or BC-PP compared to controls, likely due to receipt of aggressive multi-modality therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Post-partum; Pregnancy; Prognosis; Young women
Authors: Anna L V Johansson; Therese M-L Andersson; Chung-Cheng Hsieh; Sven Cnattingius; Mats Lambe Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Derman Basaran; Mert Turgal; Kemal Beksac; Ozgur Ozyuncu; Omer Aran; M Sinan Beksac Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Hatem A Azim; Luigi Santoro; William Russell-Edu; George Pentheroudakis; Nicholas Pavlidis; Fedro A Peccatori Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Frédéric Amant; Gunter von Minckwitz; Sileny N Han; Marijke Bontenbal; Alistair E Ring; Jerzy Giermek; Hans Wildiers; Tanja Fehm; Sabine C Linn; Bettina Schlehe; Patrick Neven; Pieter J Westenend; Volkmar Müller; Kristel Van Calsteren; Brigitte Rack; Valentina Nekljudova; Nadia Harbeck; Michael Untch; Petronella O Witteveen; Kathrin Schwedler; Christoph Thomssen; Ben Van Calster; Sibylle Loibl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer K Litton; Carla L Warneke; Karin M Hahn; Shana L Palla; Henry M Kuerer; George H Perkins; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Chad Barnett; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Richard L Theriault Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-04-10
Authors: Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Chris Robertson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Concetta De Cicco; Francesca De Lucia; Roberto Gennari Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Katarzyna J Jerzak; Nechama Lipton; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Dina Boles; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Gregory R Pond; Ellen Warner Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Josephine Nsaful; Verna Vanderpuye; Aba Anoa Scott; Florence Dedey; Samuel A Oppong; Rita Appiah-Danquah; Nelson Damale; Benjamin Fenu; Theodore Wordui; Joel Yarney; Joe Nat Clegg-Lamptey Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2020-11-10
Authors: Hanne Lefrère; Liesbeth Lenaerts; Virginia F Borges; Pepper Schedin; Patrick Neven; Frédéric Amant Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.437