| Literature DB >> 32162062 |
Dagmar N van Deursen1, Odile A van den Heuvel1,2, Jan Booij3, Henk W Berendse4, Chris Vriend5,6.
Abstract
Autonomic dysfunction is a common non-motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD). Dopamine and serotonin are known to play a role in autonomic regulation, and, therefore, PD-related degeneration of serotonergic and dopaminergic neurons in these regions may be associated with autonomic dysfunction. We sought to clarify the association between extrastriatal serotonergic and striatal dopaminergic degeneration and the severity of autonomic symptoms, including gastrointestinal, pupillomotor, thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and urinary dysfunction. We performed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to determine the relationships between (extra)striatal serotonergic and dopaminergic degeneration and autonomic dysfunction in 310 patients with PD. We used [123I]FP-CIT SPECT binding to presynaptic serotonin (SERT) and dopamine (DAT) transporters as a measure of the integrity of these neurotransmitter systems, and the SCOPA-AUT (Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Autonomic) questionnaire to evaluate the perceived severity of autonomic dysfunction. Motor symptom severity, medication status, and sex were added to the model as covariates. Additional analyses were also performed using five subdomains of the SCOPA-AUT: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, urinary, thermoregulatory, and pupillomotor symptoms. We found that autonomic symptoms were most significantly related to lower [123I]FP-CIT binding ratios in the right caudate nucleus and were mainly driven by gastrointestinal and cardiovascular dysfunction. These results provide a first look into the modest role of dopaminergic projections towards the caudate nucleus in the pathophysiology of autonomic dysfunction in PD, but the underlying mechanism warrants further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Autonomic dysfunction; Dopamine; Parkinson; Serotonin; [123I]FP-CIT SPECT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32162062 PMCID: PMC7320937 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09785-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol ISSN: 0340-5354 Impact factor: 4.849
Fig. 1Inclusion and exclusion of patients. SCOPA-AUT Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease—Autonomic, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography
Sample characteristics
| 310 (62.6%) | |
| Age (years) | 66.35 (± 10.80) |
| SCOPA-AUT score | 13.15 (± 7.84) |
| UPDRS-III scorea | 24.37 (± 12.52) |
| Hoehn and Yahr stage (in %)b | |
| 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 15.2 |
| 1.5 | 6.8 |
| 2.0 | 40.6 |
| 2.5 | 18.1 |
| 3.0 | 6.8 |
| 4.0 | 2.9 |
| 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Disease duration (years)c | 3.68 (± 4.26) |
| MMSE scored | 27.60 (± 3.24) |
| LEDD (mg/day)e | 136.70 (± 258.09) |
| BDI scoref | 10.47 (± 7.59) |
| BR left thalamus | 0.75 (± 0.18) |
| BR right thalamus | 0.74 (± 0.19) |
| BR hypothalamusg | 0.66 (± 0.21) |
| BR midbrain | 0.76 (± 0.16) |
| BR left caudate nucleus | 1.81 (± 0.43) |
| BR right caudate nucleus | 1.86 (± 0.44) |
| BR left posterior putamen | 1.59 (± 0.41) |
| BR right posterior putamen | 1.48 (± 0.41) |
For all variables except number of patients, the mean (standard deviation) is reported
SCOPA-AUT Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease—Autonomic; UPDRS-III Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, Sect. 3 (motor evaluation); MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination; LEDD levodopa equivalent daily dose; BR [123I]FP-CIT binding ratio
a24 patients had missing data
b24 patients had missing data
c63 patients had missing data
d40 patients had missing data
e12 patients had missing data
f10 patients had missing data
g1 patient had missing data
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses with the SCOPA-AUT and each ROI
| ROI | Step | Variable | Δ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left thalamus | 1 | Age | − 0.133 | 0.019 | 0.018 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.102 | 0.081 | |||
| SA | ||||||
| Right thalamus | 1 | Age | − 0.169 | 0.003 | 0.029 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.162 | 0.006 | |||
| SA | − 0.029 | 0.624 | 0.029 | 0.001 | ||
| Hypothalamus | 1 | Age | − 0.212 | 0.000 | 0.045 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.183 | 0.002 | |||
| SA | ||||||
| Midbrain | 1 | Age | − 0.041 | 0.469 | 0.002 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.025 | 0.671 | |||
| SA | − 0.064 | 0.276 | 0.006 | 0.004 | ||
| Left caudate nucleus | 1 | Age | − 0.345 | 0.000 | 0.119 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.307 | 0.000 | |||
| SA | ||||||
| Right caudate nucleus | 1 | Age | − 0.263 | 0.000 | 0.069 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.215 | 0.000 | |||
| SA | ||||||
| Left posterior putamen | 1 | Age | − 0.102 | 0.072 | 0.010 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.066 | 0.256 | |||
| SA | ||||||
| Right posterior putamen | 1 | Age | − 0.122 | 0.032 | 0.015 | |
| 2 | Age | − 0.084 | 0.147 | |||
| SA |
Hierarchical model, method: enter. N = 310 for all except hypothalamus, where N = 309. SA = SCOPA-AUT score, β = standardized regression coefficient, p = significance, R2 = proportion of variance of independent variable explained by the regression model. ΔR2 = difference between R2 of model 1 and model 2. The most relevant results are highlighted in bold
Fig. 2Partial plot of the association between [123I]FP-CIT binding ratios in the right caudate nucleus and SCOPA-AUT scores, corrected for age and UPDRS-III scores