Literature DB >> 32161964

Plasma Sarcosine Measured by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Distinguishes Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Hyperplasia.

Pavel A Markin1,2, Alex Brito1, Natalia Moskaleva1, Miguel Fodor3, Ekaterina V Lartsova4, Yevgeny V Shpot5, Yulia V Lerner6, Vasily Y Mikhajlov4, Natalia V Potoldykova5, Dimitry V Enikeev5, Alexey V Lyundup7, Svetlana A Appolonova1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sarcosine was postulated in 2009 as a biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). Here, we assess plasma sarcosine as a biomarker that is complementary to prostate-specific antigen (PSA).
METHODS: Plasma sarcosine was measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in adults classified as noncancerous controls (with benign prostate hyperplasia [BPH], n = 36), with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN, n = 16), or with PCa (n = 27). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Plasma sarcosine levels were higher in the PCa (2.0 µM [1.3-3.3 µM], P <.01) and the PIN (1.9 µM [1.2-6.5 µM], P <.001) groups than in the BPH (0.9 µM [0.6-1.4 µM]) group. Plasma sarcosine had "good" and "very good" discriminative capability to detect PIN (area under the curve [AUC], 0.734) and PCa (AUC, 0.833) versus BPH, respectively. The use of PSA and sarcosine together improved the overall diagnostic accuracy to detect PIN and PCa versus BPH.
CONCLUSION: Plasma sarcosine measured by GC-MS had "good" and "very good" classification performance for distinguishing PIN and PCa, respectively, relative to noncancerous patients diagnosed with BPH. © American Society for Clinical Pathology 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; mass spectrometry; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; sarcosine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32161964     DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmaa008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Med        ISSN: 0007-5027


  4 in total

Review 1.  Circulating metabolite biomarkers: a game changer in the human prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Sabareeswaran Krishnan; Shruthi Kanthaje; Devasya Rekha Punchappady; M Mujeeburahiman; Chandrahas Koumar Ratnacaram
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Ultrasensitive Ti3C2TX MXene/Chitosan Nanocomposite-Based Amperometric Biosensor for Detection of Potential Prostate Cancer Marker in Urine Samples.

Authors:  Stefania Hroncekova; Tomas Bertok; Michal Hires; Eduard Jane; Lenka Lorencova; Alica Vikartovska; Aisha Tanvir; Peter Kasak; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Processes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions.

Authors:  Liying Han; Guanyong He; Yingjie Mei; Qing Yu; Minning Zhao; Fu Luo; Guanxun Cheng; Wen Liang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-04-23

4.  Effect of Bicalutamide Combined with Docetaxel on Serum PSA and VEGF Levels in Patients with Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhaoxin Guo; Xiaolin Hu; Renguang Lv; Yongzhen Zhang; Liwei Meng; Zhaoxu Liu; Lei Yan
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.464

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.