| Literature DB >> 32161532 |
Jizheng Zhao1,2,3, Peter Manza4, Corinde Wiers4, Huaibo Song1,2,3, Puning Zhuang1,2,3, Jun Gu5, Yinggang Shi1, Gene-Jack Wang4, Dongjian He1,2,3.
Abstract
Age-related alterations of functional brain networks contribute to cognitive decline. Current theories indicate that age-related intrinsic brain functional reorganization may be a critical marker of cognitive aging. Yet, little is known about how intrinsic interhemispheric functional connectivity changes with age in adults, and how this relates to critical executive functions. To address this, we examined voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC), a metric that quantifies interhemispheric communication, in 93 healthy volunteers (age range: 19-85) with executive function assessment using the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) scales. Resting functional MRI data were analyzed to assess VMHC, and then a multiple linear regression model was employed to evaluate the relationship between age and the whole-brain VMHC. We observed age-related reductions in VMHC of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and hippocampus in the medial temporal lobe subsystem, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and insula in salience network, and inferior parietal lobule in frontoparietal control network. Performance on the color-word inhibition task was associated with VMHC of vmPFC and insula, and VMHC of vmPFC mediated the relationship between age and CWIT inhibition reaction times. The percent ratio of correct design scores in design fluency test correlated positively with VMHC of the inferior parietal lobule. The current study suggests that brain interhemispheric functional alterations may be a promising new avenue for understanding age-related cognitive decline.Entities:
Keywords: Delis-Kaplan executive function system; executive function; frontoparietal control network; medial temporal lobe subsystem; mediation analysis; salience network; voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32161532 PMCID: PMC7054233 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Demographic characteristics.
| Age (years) | 19–85 | 42.65 ± 1.93 |
| Gender | F45/M48 | |
| Handedness | Right 79/Left 12, one subject was unknown, one subject was ambidextrous | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.3–40 | 26.16 ± 0.50 |
| BDI_Total | 0–12 | 2.43 ± 0.33 |
Descriptive analysis on D-KEFS scores, and the partial correlations of each D-KEFS scores and age, with gender, handedness, and body mass index (BMI) as covariates.
| Verbal Fluency | Letter Fluency | 18–67 | 42.67 ± 1.15 | 0.094 (0.382) |
| Category Fluency | 18–63 | 42.73 ± 0.95 | −0.217 (0.042) | |
| Category Switching Fluency | 7–20 | 13.17 ± 0.30 | ||
| Category Switching Accuracy | 3–19 | 11.41 ± 0.34 | ||
| Design Fluency | Empty Dots Design | 2–18 | 10.65 ± 0.34 | −0.139 (0.197) |
| Filled Dots Design | 4–20 | 10.27 ± 0.35 | −0.113 (0.292) | |
| Alternating Design | 14–50 | 32.63 ± 0.81 | 0.214 (0.045) | |
| Percent Ratio of Correct Design | 34–100 | 82.49 ± 1.45 | ||
| Color Word Interference | Word Naming | 12–33 | 20.66 ± 0.45 | 0.145 (0.177) |
| Color Naming | 16–45 | 27.12 ± 0.54 | 0.262 (0.014) | |
| Color-word Inhibition | 26–95 | 50.88 ± 1.32 | ||
| Sorting | Free Sort Confirmed Sorts | 2–53 | 9.60 ± 0.55 | −0.167 (0.121) |
| Recognition Sorts | 16–63 | 36.73 ± 1.16 | ||
| Description Sorts | 8–59 | 34.66 ± 1.12 | −0.205 (0.056) | |
| Twenty Questions Tests | Total Questions Asked | 16–46 | 26.62 ± 0.61 | 0.051 (0.634) |
| Total Weighted Achievement | 7–20 | 15.12 ± 0.28 | −0.080 (0.457) | |
| Initial Abstraction | 7–60 | 29.09 ± 1.31 | −0.027 (0.801) |
The foci of brain areas showed intrinsic activity associating with age (PFWE = 0.05, family-wise error correction) when controlling for gender, handedness, body mass index (BMI), FD, and total intracranial volume (TICV).
| Putamen | – | 2733 | 7.08 | ± 27 | −3 | 9 |
| Insula | BA 13 | 6.02 | ± 36 | 21 | 6 | |
| Hippocampus | BA 28 | 5.72 | ± 24 | −15 | −21 | |
| Superior Temporal Gyrus | BA 22 | 5.42 | ± 54 | −9 | −15 | |
| Globus Pallidus | – | 5.23 | ± 24 | 15 | 6 | |
| Paracentral Lobule | BA 3 | 129 | 5.53 | ± 21 | −30 | 60 |
| Precentral Gyrus | BA 4 | 131 | 4.94 | ± 45 | −9 | 48 |
| Anterior Cingulate | BA 24 | 149 | 4.96 | ± 12 | 33 | 21 |
| Anterior Cingulate | BA24 | 4.35 | ± 6 | 6 | 42 | |
| Medial Frontal Gyrus | BA 10 | 36 | 4.48 | ± 6 | 54 | −9 |
| Medial Frontal Gyrus | BA 10 | 4.47 | ± 6 | 48 | −18 | |
| Inferior Parietal Lobule | BA 40 | 47 | 4.22 | ± 60 | −39 | 45 |
FIGURE 1Brain mapping of VMHC demonstrated a significant association with age (PFWE = 0.05, family-wise error correction). VMHC was negatively associated with age in brain regions with cool color. Color bar provides T values. vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; HIPP, hippocampus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; GP, globus pallidus; pgACC, perigenual anterior cingulate cortex; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; PreG, precentral gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; ParaCL, paracentral lobule.
Mediation models on the relationship between age and D-KEFS scores.
| CWIT inhibition scores | Hippocampus (±24, −15, −21) | Beta | −0.005 | −25.012 | 0.209 | 0.335 | 0.125 |
| 0.0003 | 0.046 | 0.006 | 0.00003 | 0.026 | |||
| CI | [−0.007, −0.003] | [−48.716, −3.061] | [0.051, 0.394] | [0.181, 0.512] | [0.013, 0.277] | ||
| Insula (±36, 21, 6) | Beta | −0.005 | −27.078 | 0.206 | 0.334 | 0.128 | |
| 0.0003 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.00002 | 0.027 | |||
| CI | [−0.006, −0.003] | [−51.450, −2.091] | [0.057, 0.393] | [0.183, 0.518] | [0.015, 0.276] | ||
| Precentral Gyrus (±45, −9, 48) | Beta | −0.004 | −24.826 | 0.232 | 0.334 | 0.102 | |
| 0.001 | 0.048 | 0.003 | 0.00002 | 0.014 | |||
| CI | [−0.006, −0.003] | [−48.027, −4.394] | [0.082, 0.387] | [0.181, 0.510] | [0.016, 0.245] | ||
| − | − | ||||||
| The percent ratio of | Inferior Parietal Lobule (±60, −39, 45) | Beta | −0.004 | 29.821 | −0.146 | −0.251 | −0.106 |
| correct design scores | 0.0001 | 0.002 | 0.105 | 0.0007 | 0.014 | ||
| CI | [−0.005, −0.002] | [10.700, 52.456] | [−0.332, 0.018] | [−0.422, −0.109] | [−0.221, −0.040] | ||
| Anterior Cingulate Cortex (±12, 33, 21) | Beta | −0.003 | −33.278 | −0.350 | −0.250 | 0.100 | |
| 3.04E-06 | 0.019 | 0.0006 | 0.001 | 0.015 | |||
| CI | [−0.004, −0.002] | [−60.171, −4.815] | [−0.545, −0.182] | [−0.424, −0.105] | [0.022, 0.206] | ||
| Globus Pallidus (±24, 15, 6) | Beta | −0.004 | −41.254 | −0.407 | −0.251 | 0.156 | |
| 0.0001 | 0.002 | 0.0004 | 0.001 | 0.016 | |||
| CI | [−0.005, −0.003] | [−69.503, −5.897] | [−0.610, −0.183] | [−0.430, −0.107] | [0.028, 0.290] | ||
| Putamen (±27, −3, 9) | Beta | −0.005 | −29.378 | −0.400 | −0.251 | 0.149 | |
| 0.0009 | 0.023 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.025 | |||
| CI | [−0.006, −0.004] | [−53.794, −3.423] | [−0.646, −0.162] | [−0.423, −0.106] | [0.021, 0.295] | ||
| Sort recognition | Hippocampus (±24, −15, −21) | Beta | −0.005 | −20.805 | −0.266 | −0.168 | 0.098 |
| description scores | 0.0002 | 0.020 | 0.0004 | 0.013 | 0.015 | ||
| CI | [−0.006, −0.003] | [−40.696, −2.551] | [−0.410, −0.123] | [−0.295, −0.037] | [0.019, 0.210] | ||
| Putamen (±27, −3, 9) | Beta | −0.005 | −27.758 | −0.307 | −0.168 | 0.139 | |
| 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.0003 | 0.0166 | 0.005 | |||
| CI | [−0.006, −0.004] | [−49.604, −7.309] | [−0.481, −0.143] | [−0.302, −0.040] | [0.039, 0.262] |
FIGURE 2Mediation models on the relationship between age and CWIT inhibition reaction times. The relationship between age and CWIT inhibition reaction time was attenuated after controlling for VMHC of bilateral vmPFC. However, the direct effect of age on CWIT inhibition reaction time was still significant. Their relationship was therefore partly mediated by VMHC of bilateral vmPFC. ***P < 0.001.