Sarah Blanton1, Patricia C Clark2, George Cotsonis3, Sandra B Dunbar4. 1. Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Byrdine F. Lewis School of Nursing, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
Background: The long-term consequences of stroke affect both the carepartner (CP) and stroke survivor (SS). Understanding the effects of informal caregiving that may influence the ability of the family to carry over therapeutic activities in the home environment is critical for family-centered care.Objective: This study examined the relationship of CP and SS factors associated with CP depressive symptoms to gain insights into CP needs that may occur after formal rehabilitation therapy has ended for SS with upper extremity deficits. Methods: This correlational study used baseline data of 32 dyads of family CP and SS with upper extremity impairment who had completed rehabilitation therapy and were enrolled in a pilot study of a web-based CP-integrated rehabilitation program. Data using standard questionnaires for CP factors and SS memory and behavior problems and an objective assessment of SS upper extremity function were obtained. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson product moment correlations. Results: CPs were female (62.5%), White (61.29%), and spouses (68.75%). CPs reported mild-moderate depressive symptoms (M = 9.5 ± 8.3), and a majority had some degree of family conflict. Higher CP depressive symptoms were related to worse life changes (r = -0.41, p =.02), greater fatigue (r = 0.50, p =.004), less effective family functioning (r = 0.46, p =.01), less autonomy support to SS (r = -0.42, p =.02), and more SS memory and behavior problems (r = 0.45, p =.01). Only CP fatigue was related to SS upper extremity function.Conclusions: Negative impacts of caregiving were found in this group of relatively high physically functioning SS which may hinder CP from providing optimal support for SS. Addressing CP needs including education regarding depression, fatigue, SS memory, and behavior problems, and family functioning while SS is receiving rehabilitation therapy may be important considerations to help facilitate the CP to support the SS in carrying over therapeutic activities in the home environment.
Background: The long-term consequences of stroke affect both the carepartner (CP) and stroke survivor (SS). Understanding the effects of informal caregiving that may influence the ability of the family to carry over therapeutic activities in the home environment is critical for family-centered care.Objective: This study examined the relationship of CP and SS factors associated with CP depressive symptoms to gain insights into CP needs that may occur after formal rehabilitation therapy has ended for SS with upper extremity deficits. Methods: This correlational study used baseline data of 32 dyads of family CP and SS with upper extremity impairment who had completed rehabilitation therapy and were enrolled in a pilot study of a web-based CP-integrated rehabilitation program. Data using standard questionnaires for CP factors and SS memory and behavior problems and an objective assessment of SS upper extremity function were obtained. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson product moment correlations. Results: CPs were female (62.5%), White (61.29%), and spouses (68.75%). CPs reported mild-moderate depressive symptoms (M = 9.5 ± 8.3), and a majority had some degree of family conflict. Higher CP depressive symptoms were related to worse life changes (r = -0.41, p =.02), greater fatigue (r = 0.50, p =.004), less effective family functioning (r = 0.46, p =.01), less autonomy support to SS (r = -0.42, p =.02), and more SS memory and behavior problems (r = 0.45, p =.01). Only CP fatigue was related to SS upper extremity function.Conclusions: Negative impacts of caregiving were found in this group of relatively high physically functioning SS which may hinder CP from providing optimal support for SS. Addressing CP needs including education regarding depression, fatigue, SS memory, and behavior problems, and family functioning while SS is receiving rehabilitation therapy may be important considerations to help facilitate the CP to support the SS in carrying over therapeutic activities in the home environment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Stroke rehabilitation; caregivers; depression; family conflict; fatigue; quality of life; upper extremity
Authors: Pamela W Duncan; Richard Zorowitz; Barbara Bates; John Y Choi; Jonathan J Glasberg; Glenn D Graham; Richard C Katz; Kerri Lamberty; Dean Reker Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Melissa S Denno; Patrick J Gillard; Glenn D Graham; Marco D DiBonaventura; Amir Goren; Sepi F Varon; Richard Zorowitz Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Daniela Rohde; Eva Gaynor; Margaret Large; Orla Conway; Kathleen Bennett; David J Williams; Elizabeth Callaly; Eamon Dolan; Anne Hickey Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Tamilyn Bakas; Patricia C Clark; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Rosemarie B King; Barbara J Lutz; Elaine L Miller Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ana Moura; Filipa Teixeira; Mariana Amorim; Ana Henriques; Conceição Nogueira; Elisabete Alves Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 4.147